All posts by Editor

News

Vatican requested Italian Spy Agency to fly Orlandi to London, says Airforce Marshal

3 Comments

Editor’s note: The Italian Sentatorial Investigation into the disappearance of Emmanuela Orlandi in 1983 has arrived at explosive levels, with the testimony of a retired Marshall of the Italian Airforce confirming that when he was in service in the 80’s he heard that the Italian Secret Services (CIA equivalent) was asked by a high ranking Vatican cleric in August of 1983, just weeks after Emmanuela’s disappearance, to contract a private company to take 4 persons, two men and two women, from Ciampino Airport through a private gate. — The testimony seems to support the allegations made in the past, but denied by all who were named in them, that Emmanuela was pregnant and taken to the United Kingdom for an abortion. And that she stayed in a property owned by the Vatican at Wimbledon. — After that she disappears from history. — Speculation is that she was killed during the operation, along with her child, to cover up a pedophile ring at the highest levels of the Vatican.  — This adds to the speculation that John Paul II knew of the exact details and intentionally collaborated with the Italian Secret Services, later in that same year of 1983, to divert attention toward agents of international terrorism, even though he knew the perpetrators where working nearby the Apostolic Palace, if not inside it!

The stakes for the Church are high indeed. For if it be proven John Paul II was some how complicit in the disappearance and murder of this young 15 year old girl, before or after her disappearance, then the entire narrative that John Paul II is a Saint, and one of the best fruits of Vatican II, will go up in smoke forever, and it will be seen that Vatican II was nothing but a play-ground of sexual perverts out to destroy the Church from within.

Hearing of the Marshals testimony, the brother of the missing girl has asked Pope Francis for a private meeting. But Pope Francis refused the meeting, saying, “There are too many eyes on me”. — It should be noted that numerous scholars have shown that Pope Francis is personally tied to the same clique which ran the Vatican Bank in 1983, so that if this story blows open, he too will be ultimately discredited. In fact, it was Pope Francis, during his anti-papacy, who “canonized” John Paul II.

News

Will Pope Francis abdicate the Papacy in January?

3 Comments

Commentary on the News by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

Recently, the noted Italian journalist, Andrea Cionci, at a Conference in Namur, Belgium, on Nov. 23, 2024, stated that he has sources which say that Pope Francis has decided to resign the Papacy in January of 2025.

Pope Francis has repeatedly, however, insisted that he would not resign.

Luis Badilla reported on Aug. 24, 2021, for example, that Pope Francis has no intention of resigning for reasons of bad health.

On Dec. 13, 2023, when he declared that he has no intention of resigning, as Vatican News reported.

On January 14, 2024, when during an interview he declared he has no intention of resigning, as reported by Crux Magazine.

On March 19, 2024, when it was reported that he had “put rumours of his resignation” to rest, by the BBC.

Were all these denials a case of “thou doest protest too much!”?

Perhaps, because in October of 2024, Pope Francis said something different, when Aleteia, which works closely with the CIA disinformation program, reported that in his new Biography — which was intended to be published after his death — it will be revealed in January that he has stated that he is willing to resign if his health problems become intractable.

Is this a case of confounding the date of the books publication with the supposed date of the resignation?

Perhaps.

But it is clear that Pope Francis’ heath is deteriorating more rapidly, and that his recent appointment of Cardinals was intended as a desperate opposition to the kick-back he got on his heretical ‘Fiducia supplicans’, last year at this time. Normally a pope names cardinals only every two years, but in both 2023 and 2024 he has named Cardinals.

And this means that he himself knows his time is short. And so perhaps there is some truth in it that he will resign in January.

One can guess that the Cardinals, looking at the declining balance sheets at the Vatican, would surly counsel him to resign, because if he did so, the Jubilee year would be a success, with all the pilgrims having an additional reason to come to Rome: to see his successor.

However, many who have analyzed Jorge Mario Bergoglio’s psychology have stated that he would never give up being the center of attention.

And indeed, noted reporters have been very wrong on such topics in the past, as when Caterina Maniaci, on the same day as Luis Badilla’s report cited above, said that Pope Francis was about to pass a new law suggesting Popes to retire at 80 or 85 years of age. A thing which never happened.

As I observed years ago, a Papal Abdication by Pope Francis is politically impossible. Because in renouncing he will either posit another fake renunciation, like his predecessor Pope Benedict XVI, to hide the fact that his own election was canonically invalid, or he has to posit a valid renunciation, the text of which will prove Benedict XVI never resigned validly.  So he is entangled in the Trap of Pope Benedict XVI — a trap which is objectively there, even if you deny Pope Benedict XVI intentionally placed it to capture his godless rival.

See my recent article on the 5 Ways the next Conclave may be invalid and give us another antipope, for more about the canonical issues involved.

Canon Law, Debates, News

Belgium: Andrea Cionci during conference agrees with Br. Bugnolo on 2 points

5 Comments

News with Commentary by Br. Alexis Bugnolo
with thanks to Fr. Walter Covens for his summary of the events and his

Traduction française

Here at FromRome.Info, I try to cover all the important news about the Debate over whether Pope Benedict XVI abdicated or not and whether Pope Francis is an anti-pope or not and how he could be removed from office in a canonically valid manner.

I do this for the sake of Christ, my King, to protect His Immaculate Bride from the ravaging hands and tongues of His enemies and of not a few of His friends who say things in ignorance regarding these topics.

Since my interest is in the triumph of truth over error, I am pleased when I see those who have publicly disagreed with me accept the truth, even if it takes them two years and in doing so they do not admit I was right all along. It is not that I have a charism of being right, it is that in humility I try not to ever give my own opinion, but simply repeat what experts, scholars, Doctors of the Church, Saints and Canon Law says.

Andrea Cionci has agreed with Br. Bugnolo on two points

So I am happy to announce that Andrea Cionci has at last accepted that I was right on two important points regarding Papal Elections.

  1.  That the Cardinals must enter into conclave no later than the 20th day after the death of a Roman Pontiff, for their votes to be counted, other wise, if they do not do so, the Cardinals cannot validly elect a Pope.
  2. That it is sufficient that even a small number of electors convene to validly elect a pope.

Andrea Cionci has made these affirmations — my English is not an exact translation — in a conference given at Namur, Belgium to the “Piccolo Resto”, which was held in French, but where he intervened in Italian, with a translator translating live.

The first point is the exact rule from the Papal Law, Universi Domini gregis. The second is derived from the Code of Canon Law, which says that in all ecclesiastical elections, the validity of the election is not destroyed by the paucity of electors who present themselves. So in fact, even 1 Cardinal in a Conclave, or 1 layman in an Assembly of Apostolic Right, could validly elect a pope: presuming there was a proper convocation of the Conclave or Assembly. Cf. the Code of Canon Law for these conditions.

Cionci holds, though, there needs to be at least 3 Cardinals, since he misinterprets the requirement of a majority to validly elect. He evidently does not think a sole vote in a conclave of only 1 cardinal is not a majority. An opinion which shows his entire confusion on how to read the Papal Law!

The Papal Law currently in force, however, does not provide any way for electing a Pope if the Cardinals in charge of convoking a conclave fail to do so, or if none appear before the 21st day. For Cionci, this means there is no other way. But as I have said last week, only someone entirely ignorant in jurisprudence holds that a law remains in force if its fundamental condition is obstructed.

Where Andrea Cionci still is making up things

Andrea Cionci still believes, however, that only Cardinals in a Conclave can elect a pope in a valid manner, because being an opera singer and an instructor in singing, and only a journalist on the side, he has absolutely no training in Canon Law. He cannot even read Latin. I know these things because he told me himself.

He is now, however, claiming that though Pope Francis is an antipope, Cardinals can convene after his death and validly elect a true pope. While it is true that after Pope Francis’ death Cardinals can validly elect his successor, a true pope, certain conditions could invalidate that; however, Cionci is QUITE WRONG in claiming that Cardinals after the death of an ANTI-POPE can enter into conclave, since that is expressly forbidden by the Papal Law, which only allows Conclaves after the death of TRUE POPES. — I use capitals here, to shout, since having said this before, he still seems to be deaf to the truth and refuses to read what is written in the Papal Law, Universi Dominici Gregis.

I will add that during his conference he claimed that Father Ferdinando Cornet agrees with him in his position.

Cionci claims Pope Francis will resign in January of 2025

He is also claiming that “according to his sources”, Pope Francis will resign in January.

Let’s see if Andrea Cionci’s sources are valid or not, by waiting to see what happens.

Cionci wants you to know his position on Conclaves is absurd

I do not think he believes his own reasons are strong enough to convince the Cardinals, though, since he also said, during the response to Questions, that if no valid Cardinal elects a true pope before August 18, 2036, when the third-youngest will become 80 years of age and lose his right to vote, then the Church will never have a pope again. — This expressly contradicts the First Vatican Council which teaches that is the Will of God that Saint Peter have perpetual successors in the See of Rome.

So I am glad he expressed his own opinion ad absurdum, since this will help true Catholics realize that his position on the obligatory nature of always following the Papal Law is not sustainable, reasonable, or a Catholic approach, since it ends in the self-destruction of the Church by the pharasaical observance of a merely positive law.

Evidently Father Cornet also does not believe, however, that he and Cionci have good enough reasons to convince the Cardinals to act, because during the conference he asks the faithful to ask priests to pray for the graces the Cardinals need.

One slight error made by Cionci during his talk is to say that there are 30 Cardinals who can vote in a Conclave who were appointed by Popes John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI and that all of these need to be petitioned. But he fails to realize that at least 11 of them are members of the St. Gallen Mafia. So by petitioning them all, he is giving certain knowledge of his operation to the enemy.

For an throughly Catholic solution to how Pope Benedict XVI could and did have a juridically valid successor see the article, The Triump of the Lamb, here at FromRome.Info.

Videos of the Conference are in Italian and French

The conference was held apparently held on November 23, 2024, at Namur, Belgium, and 110 were expected to attend. About half of those attending came from France, some by car from Languedoc. This was the very day after I had publicly rebuked Cionci in the strongest manner for his previous positions.

The French Translator stated that the French Edition of Andrea Cionci’s Book, The Ratzinger Code, has been read by more than 1 million in the French speaking world. But she fails to mention that Father Walter Covens is its translator. — The translation was done while Pope Benedict XVI was still in life.

The conference was transmitted on the YouTube Channel: Hildegarde de Bingen, 5 days ago. See below. The owner of this channel is the woman doing the translations in the videos. So please let her know that she should mention the name of the translator, since he merits that much.

What Father Cornet said …

Father Cornet, for his part, made a grave error, in restricting the obligation of Catholics to the “laws” of the Church. He evidently has never studied jurisprudence, because the correct maxim, is that Catholics are obliged to do what is right and just, which is expressed in Divine Revelation and Apostolic Tradition, and from time to times is applied in canons and laws for particular circumstances of history. Thus he appears to be saying we should follow Canon Law or Papal Laws even if they went contrary to Apostolic or Divine Law. That would be the very heresy of Pharasaism, which Our Lord condemned in the Gospels many times.

He also said that unless a priest say he does not intent to confect a Sacrament, that the Sacrament is considered valid.  The correct Catholic doctrine in such cases, is that the Sacrament IS valid, not merely considered valid, so long as a validly ordained priest using valid matter and saying the correct words, has not explicated such an intention. This difference seems small, but “to consider a thing valid” and for a thing “to be valid” are two different orders of being, the former is a mental judgement, the latter is a reality existing in this world. To attempt to quell the doubts of souls as regards the validity of a Sacrament, one has to speak of reality, not mental judgements of reality. This is the entire basis for the finding of Benedict XVI’s renunciation as non-existent in reality, even though many in their minds think or consider or judge it happened.

He said many other things, but this one strikes me as most worthy of note: that Cardinal Achille Liénart (who consecrated Archbishop Lefebrve a Bishop) before his own death confessed to being a 33rd Degree Freemason; and that he, Father Cornet, knows this personally, because he knew the Cardinal in life. Since the Cardinal died in 1973, however, I wonder how a Argentine in his sixties, like Father Cornet, barely at the age of maturity, would know personally a Cardinal in France? Perhaps I misunderstand how he phrased this. However, the report that the Cardinal confessed to being a Freemason before death has already been published more than 15 years ago, here.

News

Pope Francis hit his bedside table and suffers major contusion

5 Comments

Editor’s Note: The Catholic Religion is the true Faith, revealed by the one and only true Living God, Who gives a just recompense to every man, for the good or evil he does, rewards for doing good, and punishments for doing evil, in this life and in the next.  Recently we saw Pope Francis attempt the heretical reformation of the Catholic Church by declaring the nonsensical and heretical Synodal Document “ordinary magisterium”.  After which, he was struck with some malady in his left eye.

On Friday, he fell and hit his bedside table and suffered a major bruise to his face on the left side of his chin. This was the day before he had the diabolical temerity to raise to the dignity of the Cardinalate numerous men who agree with him in his heretical ‘Fiducia supplicans”, where he called on clergy to employ the Holy Name of God to approve of the worst sexual perversions on the planet.

God will not be mocked. And if you mock Him, He has Angels who are experts in dishing out punishments and punches. — And though there is no historical evidence that Saint Nicholas of Myra punched Arius, the heretic, in the face, it is notable that Pope Francis had his fall on the Feast of good old Saint Nick!

From a medical point of view, Pope Francis’ increasing frequency of medical issues is a sign that the bells will soon toll for him. It is a darn shame that he has squandered so many of the graces of God which could have made him honest, holy and zealous in true service to Him.

UPDATE: During the solemn veneration of the Statue of the Immaculate in the Piazza di Spagna, today, at Rome, Pope Francis was seen hobbled, using a 5 footed cane. So it appears his knee is inflammed and that might have been the cause of his fall. — In this video, Pope Francis can be seen to be gasping for air, fraught with tremors and has an exceptionally swollen face. It is a wonder that his doctors are not attempting to correct his bloated tissue problem. — Alas when it comes time to pray to the Holy Virgin, Pope Francis launches into a Protestant type of homily where in the midst of praying to Our Lady he speaks about economic and political problems and reminds everyone that a Jubilee Year is about to begin!

News

VATICAN desecrates Jubilee by approving Pilgrimage of Sodomites

10 Comments

Editor’s Note: As I said in my report yesterday about the carpet-ban on Masses at the Basilica of the Holy Cross, I think the Jubilee year is going to be a flop.

Now with this report, I urge all families and pro-family organizations to BOYCOTT the Jubilee, lest your children be sexually assaulted by strange and immoral people coming to the city to meet Pope Francis.

At this point, I will not omit to say, again, that all those who know of the Sutri Initiative, but still refuse to speak of it on their influential websites (Ann Barnhardt, Eric Sammons, Frank Walker, Michael Matt, Taylor Marshall, Dr. Anthony Stine, Matt Gaspers, ETWN, CNA, Edwin Pentin, Marco Tosatti, Andrea Cionci, Don Minutella etc. etc.) are going to merit the awful punishment for allowing Rome to “lose the Faith and become the Seat of the Antichrist”, as Our Lady warned Melanie at La Salette, because by their intentional silence about the only canonical and juridically valid way of judging the invalidity of a man’s claim to to the Papal Throne, they share in causam in the malice of Pope Francis and enable that malice to continually bear fruit.

News

Dr. Feser, who gaslighted on Benedict XVI’s Renunciation, says “Don’t tolerate being gaslit!”

5 Comments

Editor’s Note: Here Dr. Feser gaslights the faithful once again, by saying, since the Church never taught that a pope is always infallible, he can be a manifest, pertinacious heretic. — This illation (logical argument) is obviously dishonest, since infallibility regards the exercise of the teaching authority of the Roman Pontiff, but heresy is always a personal sin or crime.

I share this video, to make it clear why someone who insists on social conservatism (GOP) also does not want Catholics to ask the Church to haul Pope Francis to a Provincial Council. — And yes, that is Matt Frad, even though he has gone from appearing to be an English academic to an Argentine Gaucho (Cowboy).

As for Dr. Feser implying that “If Christ tolerates this, so should we”, his implicit argument is the utter blasphemy and quite contrary to the entire teaching of Our Divine Master, as practiced by the Apostles, who severely punished and expelled malefactors from office and from the Church.

Dr. Feser also says, blasphemously, “The Pope is the most important man on Earth”. But in the Catholic Faith, the most important Man on Earth is Jesus Christ in the Most Blessed Sacrament, Who is true God and true Man, always.

Andrea Cionci, the journalist and opera singer, ably refuted Feser’s attempt to keep Catholics from thinking about the anomalies in Pope Benedict’s Renunciation, here.

Dr. Feser is considered one of the more famous and noted philosophers of the United States, which is not saying a lot about the state of intellectual integrity in America.

I won’t continue to list his errors, as his talk on the Papacy is an Operation Gaslight Express. — Dr. Feser confesses to being a re-convert to the Catholic Faith. He is another example of someone who did not learn his catechism correctly when he converted.

News

ROME: Rector of Basilica of Holy Cross to carpet-ban Masses there during Jubilee Year

1 Comment

Exclusive Report by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

The Basilica of the Holy Cross in Jerusalem, at Rome, is one of the holiest places of pilgrimage in the Eternal City, because it houses the largest collection of major relics of Christ’s Passion and Death in the world.

These relics include, (1) the largest single piece of the Wood of the Holy Cross upon which Christ was Crucified and which was excavated by St. Helena, mother of the Emperor Constantine; (2) One of the Nails with which Christ was affixed to the Cross; (3) one of the Thorns from the Crown of Thorns, which was placed on His sacred Brow to humiliate and torture Him; (4) The cross-beam of the Cross of the Good Thief; (5) the Titulum, upon which Pontius Pilate wrote the sentence of punishment in 3 languages: Jesus Christ, King of the Judeans.

So naturally speaking, during a Jubilee Year — which begins Dec. 25, 2024, and lasts until January 6, 2026 — the Basilica is the pilgrimage destination for millions of Catholics, both laymen and clergy.

But this Jubilee Year will be different, because NO MASSES will be allowed to be celebrated anywhere in the Basilica by pilgrim priests. Even Bishops with a large number of pilgrims attending them in a single group have to make prior arrangements to have permission. They also have to be a Bishop approved by the Rector of the Basilica.

Moreover, no masses will be allowed at any of the side altars, nor in the Chapel of the Relics.

No masses, in any language, not even Italian or Latin, will be allowed, except the morning and Sunday masses of the local Parish, at which the Rector or his staff preside.

I have all this information from the Parish secretary, who confirmed it for me in person. In fact, when I assumed she was referring to Masses celebrated only at the main altar, I asked about masses at the side altar, and she looked so shocked, as if I had asked permission about Satanic Rituals.

When I asked about the reason for the universal ban on the Mass, in any language or rite, the secretary told me that the vast numbers of pilgrims would make it impossible to allow separate masses and still control the crowds visiting.

I do not know about the crowds. I tend to think the Jubilee year will be a nothing burger, since the parking lots in the tourist areas of the city, which are usually full are presently nearly 50% empty.

The sacristy of the Basilica, presently used as a parish office, featured vinyl banners with reproductions of Renaissance art, full of male nudity of one kind or another, from floor to ceiling on both sides.  So as I wondered at this carpet ban on the Mass, I wondered what the reason was.

Surely, to celebrate the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass in the vicinity of the very relics of Christ’s Passion is a good thing, no?

FromRome.info has twice featured the Basilica in Videos, here, and here; for those who cannot or won’t come to Rome during the Jubilee.

CREDITS: The featured image is of the front facade of the Basilica of the Holy Cross in Jerusalem (Santa Croce) taken by Br. Bugnolo in October, 2024.

News

USA: TX Federal Judge blocks BOI Law nationwide

1 Comment

Editor’s Note: The Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) law was one of the worst laws passed under the Biden Regime. It required all small businesses to share personal information, even place of current residence, with the U. S. Federal Government, for such a wide range of persons in a company that it was tantamount to giving elected and unelected Federal officers a database of information which could used to politically persecute their opponents, physically harass their workers, and even undertake targeted confiscation of property.

News

Google continues to Black-out FromRome.Info reports

3 Comments

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

I often complain that it is difficult for new readers to find FromRome.Info, because since the summer of 2022, the Globalists have begun to remove true opposition sites from their publicized databases.

So from time to time, I experiment to see what the level of censorship is. So here goes …

A Test, done on Dec. 4, 2024 A. D.:

Here is the example of one search, where I used Google, whose bots regularly crawl ALL the pages at FromRome.Info, to let me know how many articles at FromRome.info mention Msgr. Nicola Bux:

COMMENTARY

That’s right, Google is publicly claiming that there are only two articles among the more than 11,520+ articles, that mention Msgr. Nicola Bux!

The Truth his however, if you use the FromRome.Info search bar:

Is that you can find 12 such articles. Six times more articles than Google admits exists! Click image below to see for yourself!

IT IS TIME TO CALL GOOGLE WHAT IT IS,

G lobalist
O rganized
O nline
G ag
L ie and
E viscerate

Engine….

I would ask all of my readers who are residents of countries where internet censorship is illegal to file a criminal complaint against Google for what they are doing. And I thank you in advance and assure you of my prayers!

News

Dr. Marshall shocked, 83% of his viewers hold Benedict was the true pope until death

5 Comments

Editor’s Note: See what he says at 17:00 minute mark. Dr. Marshall confirms the contents of the letters disclosed and translated here at FromRome.info on Dec. 2. Dr. Marshall is shocked rightly, because he has done everything to sow doubt in the arguments that Pope Benedict XVI invalidly resigned. His disinformation project has failed miserably. Thanks be to God!

But as regards Archbishop Viganò’s Hegelian critique of the Papacy since Pius XII, the numerous reports at Ordo Militaris Radio TV show that his analysis is shallow, since it ignores the involvement of the U. S. Government in undermining the Church and launching Vatican II. Those who use this kind of critique, talk about the problem but will never do anything about it. If they did, they would be at war with the White Lodges and would have to love the Church for Christ’s sake, trusting only in the power of Christ to defend them.

Furthermore, the Archbishop’s allegation that Pope Benedict only stayed in Rome at the insistence of the Conservatives in the Vatican, is completely false. The residence of Pope Benedict XVI were he stayed for the rest of his life after February of 2013 was restored by order of Pope Benedict XVI prior to his resignation, to be his permanent residence. All testify that he himself invented the title “Pope Emeritus”.

As for Dr. Marshall, he never could figure out why the Renunciation was invalid, so the rest of his speculations about Pope Benedict XVI are not, in my mind, worth much. He must first admit to the public he was wrong and accept the objective principles of Canon Law which are very Thomistic, a thing he claims also to be, though he acts more Talmudically than Thomistically.

Canon Law, News

Vatican issues decree of supression against Texas Carmel

Leave a comment

Editor’s Note: This is another sad chapter in a case which has scandalized the Catholic world for the numerous incidents of malfeasance by the local Bishop and Pope Francis’ canonically non-existent “Dicastery for Consecrated Life” erected during his anti-pontificate.

First the mother superior was accused of a grave violation of her vow of chastity for having engaged in  “phone sex” with a priest, a violation of purity which is not included in any traditional book of morals regarding the observance of the vow of chastity or virginity, which requires an external physical act with another person or in their presence.

Second, the nuns were publicly ridiculed as violating their religious vows for their intemperate use of cannabis as a pain killer, a practice which is also not a crime in canon law, though it is an offense against right morals. Monasteries and Convents throughout the world and especially in the Andes have used herbal healing for centuries. In fact, the whole concept of a pharmacy was invented in Monasteries, since these were the only institutions which for centuries had the wherewithal to grow, collect and prepare herbal remedies in a highly ethical and consistent context.

Third, the public defamation they suffered from the local Bishop, which he uses to justify an attempt to take their property and control their internal affairs, even though he seemingly takes quite a light hand with his own priests who are involved in sexual offense.

Finally, the denial of the Sacraments to these religious women, the denial of their right to keep, take and live their vows to Jesus Christ and the irregular intervention of the Vatican declaring them “defected from the Catholic Faith” for having taken on spiritual care from the clergy of the Society of Saint Pious X, an entity which in which membership has never been characterized by any Papal Law or Act as “defecting from the Catholic Faith”.

Moreover, the attempt to suppress their monastery and declare them no longer Catholic is a most grave attack on their persons, since they have by vows to Our Lord Jesus Christ promises perpetual poverty, whereby they can only live by alms. As Saint Thomas Aquinas teaches, to publicly vilify a person who lives by alms is equivalent to murder.

I agree with Attorney Bobo, who is leading their defense, along with the president of Gonzaga University (Jesuit founded school), that these Carmelites have had their canonical and civil rights grossly offended by the local Bishop and Pope  Francis’s “Curial Administration”. Furthermore, I am of the opinion that canonically, all the actions taken against them are invalid in the sight of God, since they transgress numerous canons of the Code of Canon Law regarding proper procedures and rights of religious communities.

The correct pastoral procedure, from day one, would  have been to counsel temperance in the use of herbal remedies and forbid the use of the phone to those sisters who are misusing it, while encouraging them to walk more faithfully in their vocation by a life of solitude and penance, not to mention a more strict observance of cloister.

News

ITALY: Faithful file criminal complaint against Archbishop for destruction of Eucharistic Miracle

1 Comment

Editor’s Note: Once again, the Catholic Faithful in Italy are taking action to defend the Catholic Faith against careless clergy who fear neither God nor men. This case involved the Eucharistic Miracle of Savarna, which occurred on January 28, 2023 A. D., when after a consecrated Host was found on the floor by the Sacristan of the Church, it being placed in water to allow It to dissolve, the Host was found intact a day later, bleeding. A scientific examination requested by the Pastor, Don Nicolò Giosuè, found that true Blood was present in the water, in which the Host was found. The Archbishop, Msgr. Ghizzoni then intervened to have a second laboratory examine the miracle: which subsequently found “no evidence” of human blood. He then had the evidence of the Miracle destroyed without seeking consultation. So Attorney Francesco Minutillo of Forli has filed a criminal complaint with the local civil authorities, alleging the possible crimes of insult to the Catholic Faith and destruction of an Object of worship, against the Archbishop.

Philosophy, Politics

Why Masonic & Godless States have no real authority to govern

Leave a comment

 Editor’s Note: While the producers of this video do not accept the Christian Faith, their arguments are reasonably sound when used against a State which claims moral authority while denying that Christ is King and while establishing a legal system which claims the right to define what is moral and what is not immoral. — The Catholic position on the State is that it can only have authority when it explicitly and actually conforms itself to the Divine or Natural Law; and thus it must enshrine always that Law in its laws and have safeguards to prevent deviations from this ideal. Thus only the Catholic State, today, could have authority over men, because all other forms of the state deny either the existence of God’s authority in His Laws, as revealed, or as taught by Him in nature. But the video speaks well, and adopts the perennial Catholic position, that even in a state without authority, those of its laws which are conformable to the Natural Law should be complied with, not for the sake of the state, but for the righteousness of doing so.

News

Inauguration of Restored Notre Dame: Trump yes, Pope Francis no

2 Comments

Editor’s Note: What we are seeing here is the perfected theatre of the White and Black Lodges of Freemasonry, with the non-Catholic Trump (Skull and Bones Lodge adept) attending, and the Catholic Pope Francis (Black Lodge, Buenas Aires), refusing. — With Trump declaring the Cathedral is better than it was before [because it has a new dung-colored satanic looking novus Order altar?] Perhaps.

The purpose of this theatre is obvious: it is all part of the CIA/US Department of Defense’s declared 1953 Doctrinal Warfare program against the Catholic Church, to make the American experiment appear to be the true salvation of the world, and to discredit Catholic authorities, which they installed to discredit the Catholic religion and Church.