All posts by Editor

BREAKING: Archbishop Viganò: Pope Francis sexually corrupted vocations while Master of Novices in Buenas Aires

https://twitter.com/carlomvigano/status/1795889853663482163

Commentary by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

Everyone deserves the presumption of innocence, until by his habitual public behavior he signals otherwise. This is such a case, and I believe Archbishop Viganò’s accusation in the above tweet (see full text below) that Jorge Mario Bergoglio, while master of novices in the Jesuit Novitiate in Argentina, morally corrupted young men, because that sin would fully explain all his behavior at Rome. Cardinal McCarrick required that his seminarians sleep in bed with him the night before their ordinations; those seminarians who testified said it required little more than that. At other times he took them to the beach, and rubbed down their bodies or gave them massages. All such behavior is at the very least grooming.

The explosiveness of this accusation not only regards the accused, who is the Roman Pontiff, but the similar pervert, Cardinal McCarrick who was one of the principle members of the Mafia of St. Gallen who got Bergoglio elected as Pope, after Pope Benedict XVI, who punished McCarrick, was pushed aside. — Perhaps now it is becoming all too clear why no Cardinal of the uncanonical Conclave of 2013 bothered or cared to question the legitimacy of Pope Benedict XVI’s renunciation, since the goal  of that “conclave” seems now likely to have been the Pedophile-Sodomite takeover of the Church. — For FromRome.Info’s complete dossier on Cardinal McCarrick see here.

Today, I am vindicated for having correctly characterized the regime under Bergoglio as the Church of Sodom & Gomorrah in 2022, here.

If you have any decency, I would urge you to support the petition to have Pope Francis removed from the Papacy: it is called the Sutri Initiative, and unlike the one promoted by Rorate Caeli, anyone can participate, Catholic or not, from anywhere in the world.

The link in the tweet of the Archbishop goes to an article in Italian which argues that it is entirely incredible, that is not credible, that Bergoglio used a pejorative word about sodomites to signify he is opposed to this kind of behavior; rather he was just putting on an act.

Full Text of Archibishop Viganò’s Accusation

On 23 June 2013 when I met Bergoglio at the Domus Sanctæ Marthæ – as already extensively reported in my Memorial of August 22, 2018 – he asked me ex abrupto: «What is Cardinal McCarrick like?»

I replied to him: « Holy Father, I don’t know if you know Cardinal McCarrick, but if you ask the Congregation for Bishops, there is a dossier this big. He corrupted generations of seminarians…»

Bergoglio remained impassive and completely changed the subject.

His reaction is not surprising: Bergoglio himself committed the same abuses when he was Master of Novices of the Society of Jesus in Argentina, as personally confided to me by one of his former novices.

𝗕𝗲𝗿𝗴𝗼𝗴𝗹𝗶𝗼 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗼𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗵𝗼𝗺𝗼𝘀𝗲𝘅𝘂𝗮𝗹 𝘀𝗲𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗻𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘀𝘁𝘀: 𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝘄𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘁𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝗼𝗳 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗶𝗹𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗿𝘂𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗹𝗲𝗿𝗴𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵 𝗵𝗼𝗺𝗼𝘀𝗲𝘅𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗽𝗲𝗱𝗼𝗽𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗶𝗮, 𝘀𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗯𝘆 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗹𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗳𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗳𝘂𝗹𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝘀𝗼𝗱𝗼𝗺𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗿𝘂𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗼𝗿𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗼𝗼𝗿 𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗻𝘀 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗶𝘃𝗶𝗹 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘇𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘀𝗲 𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗺𝗲𝘀.

On the other hand, the same scurrilous terminology typical of the environments that the Argentine Jesuit deplores in words, betrays his familiarity with corrupt people accustomed to speaking to him in this way.

The protection and promotions granted to countless corrupt and perverted cardinals, bishops and priests; the buses of transvestites invited on several occasions to the Vatican; private hearings for transsexual and homosexual couples in concubinage; the scandalous LGBTQ+ media spotlight granted to James Martin, s.j.; the shameful promotion of Tucho Fernandez to Prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith; the recent appointments of two Canons of Santa Maria Maggiore who are known throughout the city of Rome as homosexuals, all confirm Bergoglio’s membership of the lobby to which he owes his nomination (and I am deliberately not calling it his “election”).

+++

The link in the tweet goes to this article, which I present here in a Google English translation of the original. The original Italian can be found here. Google fails to capture the sarcastic style of the Italian article, whose leader should read in English, if translated correctly according to context: Pope Bergoglio against “faggotry”. Yeah, we totally believe that! — The world wide attention to Pope Francis’ recent statement about sodomy shows that the Main Stream Media is obsessed with sexual perversions for the same reason Pope Francis is obsessed with keeping perverts around himself.

UPDATE:

Damian Thompson, a very notorious troller on Catholic topics on Twitter reacted to this news with a vitrolic explosion, the likes of which condemn him on his own principles of ethics:

https://twitter.com/holysmoke/status/1796140657418924217

ITALY: Italian Bishops’ Conference silently repudiates ‘Fiducia Supplicans’ in Spring Assembly

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

In a stunning turn around, the Italian Bishops’ Conference has issued no statement approving of Pope Francis’ “Gay Blessing” Document, ‘Fiducia supplicans’ during its 79th Annual Spring Meeting with Pope Francis in private at the Vatican.

As can be seen from the final official statement of the Bishops’ Conference, there is no mention at all of the document or the pro-gay agenda.

This is a 180 degree turn from the February Statement of the Conference leadership approving the document tentatively, wherein it would be promised that the entire Conference would take up the issue at its May 20-23rd meeting at the Vatican.

I think it is reasonable to conclude, therefore, that the majority of Bishops refused to approve it, and that the agenda item was removed to protect the ideological takeover of the Catholic Church being waged by Pope Francis and his sodomite cronies who are now in control of the Vatican.

It also seems to signify that the Letters of many Catholics calling for a provincial council to denounce Pope Francis, as is suggested in the Sutri Initiative in English, Italian and French versions has had a profound impact on all the Bishops of Italy, since they are clearly playing a political game, waiting for Pope Francis to die, rather than sign on his heretical profession and risk the anathema of the next and future Pope.

FromRome.Info is the only Catholic News source which has reported on this development, which says more about all the others, than anything else. FromRome.Info has led the call for Pope Francis’ deposition since October of last year, and is unique in insisting that Catholics take the unassailable juridical position of declaring and recognizing that by his heretical profession, Pope Francis himself has morally and canonically impeded the Apostolic See.

This news, today, is the Second stunning fruit of the Sutri Initiative, the First was reported here.

VATICAN: “Who am I to judge?” Pope uses vulgar expression about sodomy in Seminaries

Editor’s Note: I publish this for record, only, because by now everyone in the world who pays attention knows, even if they won’t say they do, that Pope Francis says one thing and does another, to an exceptional degree.

What I do demur with is John Allen’s claim that “frocio” is a commonly known or used word in Italy. — I have lived on and off in Italy for some 10.5 years during the last 30 years, and I have never seen this word in print, let alone heard it uttered.

Pope Francis is known for his proclivity to use vulgar language, as became notorious when he called the Chinese woman who grabbed his hand in December of 2019, a vulgar word in Spanish, used for prostitutes.

As an anthropologist, who has never been a priest, I find it difficult to imagine how Pope Francis had occasion to learn of such terminologies, since clergy and religious and faithful laity do not speak this way with one another.

A Historical Note on the Sack of Rome in 1527 & Persecutions of the Church

Finally, a small historical note: there are lots of references to the Sack of Rome in 1527, which like this article above, fail to mention that the rioting troops were Lutherans. Yes, like in the Netherlands and in Constantinople and throughout history, Catholics are accused of persecuting Lutherans, Calvinists, Greek Orthodox and Jews. But in each case it was Lutherans, Calvinists, Greek Orthodox and Jews who persecuted us first.

At Rome in 1527, the Lutheran mercenaries of Emperor Charles V killed and raped 20,000 Catholics at Rome and sacked homes and churches for weeks. In the Low Countries, the Calvinists in 1566 instigated the Beeldenstorm — virtually unknown in all English language histories easily available — a riotous pillaging and destruction of Catholic Churches and Monasteries, where sacrileges where committed on a whole scale level throughout most of the country. At Constantinople, in April of 1182, more than 60,000 Roman Catholics were murdered by the Greek Orthodox Emperor and his cronies. And in Jerusalem in 33 A. D., the King Herod, who was a sodomite, along with Jewish authorities got Christ Jesus put to death and then began a 10 year persecution of the Catholic Church, which continued beyond the time of conversion of Saint Paul, until the Catholic Religion was made lawful in 303 A. D..

These historical facts are constantly omitted by Masonic controlled news outlets and publications, because in the book of satanists, only Catholics are truly and constantly guilty. Making Pope Francis look like an outcast because he used the word, “frocio” is part of this narrative of bigotry and hatred against Catholics. There is absolutely no comparison to the number of Catholics killed or persecuted by these groups to the number of those “persecuted” by Catholic in the same groups.

But don’t be fooled by Pope Francis’ Gay-Politicking

Pope Francis is a two-steps forward to perdition, one step backward, in classic Argentine Peronist Tango style. His comments to the Italian Bishops on May 20 appear to be an obvious attempt to squelch negative reaction to his “Gay Blessing” document published nearly 6 months ago.

Indeed, by no means, does Pope Francis, by using this word, imply he has broken with the Sodomite Agenda, as can be seen from this report where a Transvestite was invited to the First World Children’s Day, by the Vatican, to entertain Catholic Children:

The Following of the Eternal Son of God requires Virginity, Chastity and Celibacy

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

This week in the Octave of the Solemnity of the Most Holy Trinity is a very apt time to remind ourselves of the great truth that eternal salvation in Christ requires that we be conformed to the Most Holy Trinity, because salvation consists first of all not in the concession of some created gift, but in the gift God gives of Himself to those who love Him.

And to receive this gift, it is necessary for all, not only to believe in Christ fully and with perseverance, detracting nothing from His Teaching, but the following of Jesus Christ, Our Savior, Who is the Way for all who wish to be saved to arrive at that Salvation.

For this reason, I wish to address a growing controversy in the Church, that of priestly celibacy, which touches upon the wider question of the role of virginity, chastity and celibacy in the Church.

For the most part, these debates and discussions revolve around the wrong center of focus: historical practices or pragmatic considerations: when such an such a practice began or began to be widespread, or the utility of having clergy and religious free from the duties of married life.

The true center of focus, however, is Jesus Christ. Because it is because all discipleship in Christ requires that the Christian follow Christ, all discipleship in Christ requires that we personally accept the renunciations He made for our salvation, in some proportion or degree of suitability to our state in life.

Thus, a priest is essentially and vocationally bound to imitate the Lord Jesus in His abstention from marriage: a thing Jesus  Christ did, not just as man, to be of service or to show us the way of mortification, nor even to teach us chastity in the ministry, or to give an example of self control, but for an even higher and eternal reason.

Because, the Eternal Son becomes a priest from the moment of His incarnation, wherein He is invested with the humanity which He will break in the Expiatory Sacrifice of the Cross, when His Body and Soul will be separated in death. Thus, for such an August Sacrifice, it was a necessity of religion that He offer the most pure flesh and blood and soul to God His Father.

Likewise, women religious are called to a life of virginity, because by the absolute removal of all occasions of impurity, they might illumine the world with the purity of Christ Jesus, who did not even dare let His eyes wander about among the crowds of faithful who followed Him.

This too is the reason why male religious are called to a life of chastity, so that their dedication to the following of Christ as the Servant of God be found also in their flesh by a perpetual purity of life which touches upon mind and body.

And all these forms of purity are also apt in their proper times and places even for the laity, who have not the vocation to be virgins, religious or clergy: because in this way every Christian at some point in his or her life, gives living example of their discipleship to Christ.

And all these practices aim for something eternal, both as regards likeness and reward, which is the most important truth we should keep in mind.

Because in the Eternal Trinity, God the Father alone generates. The Son does not generate. Therefore, the Eternal Son is the archetype of all purity, chastity, celibacy and virginity. He joins Himself to no One in an act of generation or procreation.

The work of generation of Christians too is likened to the Most Holy Trinity, because just as it pertains to the Holy Ghost to inspire men to faith and salvation, all those who are involved in the work of converting and saving souls, directly or indirectly, should avail themselves of the assistance of the Holy Spirit, not the works of the flesh.

For this reason, virginity, chastity and celibacy are essential to the Catholic Faith, the true Faith without which no one can be saved; and we should all strive not only to inculcate the appreciation of these holy works as the most authentic exterior work which testifies to Faith, Hope and Charity, but to live them in our lives, as appropriate to the times and places and states of life of our lives.

For by doing so, we by living like the Eternal Son, merit in the most worthy way to share in His Eternal Inheritance, which belongs to Him, as a Son faithful to His Eternal Father and entirely satisfied in worshiping and contemplating that Paternal Magnificence.

And this explains why the Saints affirm that God promises the certitude of Eternal Salvation only to virgins, the chaste, and the faithfully celibate.

Trump, Neo-Nazism, the 4th Reich and the role of Trad Inc.

This week, during their weekly Anti-Globalist talk show, AJ and Br. Bugnolo discuss the curious “United Reich” tweet of Donald Trump, the fixation of the “right” with censorship by Biden, and the continual signs of national socialism from Trad Inc.. They discuss in particular the biography of Marian Horvat of Tradition in Action.

Watch above at OMC Radio TV or here below through Rumble.com.

Pope Saint Gregory VII and St. Peter Damian accepted the Sutri Initiative in 1046: Why won’t you?

Historical note by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

Today is the Feast of Pope Saint Gregory VII, the greatest reforming pope of the Middle Ages, who warred relentlessly against corrupt and heretical rulers of his time. As an acolyte of Pope Gregory VI (Giovanni Graziano) he attended and accepted the decrees of the First Council of Sutri which saw 3 popes deposed: one who was canonically elected, but resigned and attempted to reclaim the throne: Benedict IX; another who usurped by papacy while he was only Metropolitan of Tusculum: Sylvester III; and the third, who was canonically elected after simonaically purchasing the papacy from Benedict IX: Gregory VI.

Saint Gregory VII accepted the results of the First Sutri Initiative in history. Even Saint Peter Damian, greatest enemy of the gay mafia in the Church, accepted the Council of Sutri. Both attended the coronation of the Henry III, the German King, as Emperor of the Romans on Dec. 25, 1046: the very man who urged the Council on the same terms as the Sutri Initiative t today.

Why then is it that so many who claim to be Catholic journalists, commentators, canonists, theologians, influencers, personalities, cardinals and bishops refuse to even talk about what happened at Sutri in 1046? let alone endorse it 100% as these two great saints, enemies of corruption and sodomy did?

That is my question for them. Ask them. If they remain silent they will only condemn themselves as fake Catholics.

In the meantime, standing as I do with the emperor Henry III, I urge everyone in Christendom to walk in the footsteps of Saint Gregory VII and Saint Peter Damian by supporting the second Sutri Initiative in history, to see Pope Francis deposed for his perfidious behavior and false claim to the papacy: in that he has never intended to accept the Papal Office for the up-building of the Church, but only to change our Holy Faith, and is thus simultaneously guilty of schism, apostasy and heresy.

OMC Radio TV Catholic News Review for May 24, 2024 A. D..

This week, AJ and Br. Bugnolo speak of more signs that the “traditionalist movement” in the Church is simply a National Socialist Front, as well as the tactics used by the CIA placed agents in the Church to destroy good Catholic clergy, religious and laity during the last 70 years.

Watch at OMC Radio TV by clicking the image above, or watch on Rumble, here below:

 

Pope Francis exonerates Cardinal Lacroix for raping girl, after victim refuses to speak with Vatican Prosecutor

Editor’s Note: It is obvious to even the most simple minded, that the proper forensic procedures were not followed. I dare say that no victim is going to ever speak with a Vatican prosecutor again, if the Prosecution Office proceeds to exonerate individuals simply because the victims refuse to meet physically with them,.  — As any who has worked with such victims knows, the last thing they can bare to do is meet with another member of the clergy or their representatives.

Pope Francis is notorious for promoting sexual perverts, approving of sexual perverts, encouraging sexual perverts, condoning their perversions and manners of self-identification, and above all of protecting sexual predators who are Bishops and Priests and Cardinals. But lately he is in a rush to exonerate them as well.

As Archbishop of Buenas Aires, Cardinal Bergoglio covered up all the sexual abuse cases and refused to publish lists of those accused. This has prevented the discovery of the actual number of victims for 40 years.

Cardinal Lacroix is one of the 8 Cardinal Advisors which assists Pope Francis in governing the Vatican City State and the Catholic Church.

Clearly Jorge Mario Bergoglio was not the man the Cardinals should have ever elected, on the basis of his record in covering up sexual abuse by clerical predators. No wonder they were eager to rid the Church of Pope Benedict XVI, who reduced to the lay state more priests than any pope in history, in order to rid the Church of these monsters who had infiltrated the clergy.

NATO Chief says the purpose of the Alliance is to sodomize Europe

https://twitter.com/jensstoltenberg/status/1791356439161933945

Editor’s Note: And we all thought NATO was an alliance to defend Europe against Marxism. Yeah!

Jens, what you are involved in is not “love” by any definition. It’s real name is misanthropy. And it’s not equal to human procreation at all. What you are really in favor of is the depopulation of Europe, which might explain why you have thrown Ukraine to the dogs of Russia and stand by watching millions of Christians in that country suffer and die.

Jens Stoltenberg is a descendant of a man who, while living in Stoltenberg, Germany, took the town’s name as his surname, a practice common among Jews. His mother too, has a surname which is found among the Ashkenazim. — Perhaps this is not only why he was given power but why he pushes the degeneracy of the Sabbatean Jews.

As for Stoltenberg, he is a hypocrite even by his own standards, because if NATO exists to allow European perverts live in peace, why is NATO standing by and doing nothing about the illegal immigration of millions of Muslims, who believe they have the right to throw sodomites from 10 story buildings?

UPDATE: And if NATO is about letting everyone live as they want, why have they not liberated Warsaw?