Pope Benedict XVI continues to wear the Ring of the Fisherman
https://twitter.com/lalomt18/status/1591481936035418113
Comments are closed.
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |
I sent this to a priest friend of mine who believes the Pope Francis is legitimate, and he says that all Bishops wear a ring, and that this is not a sign that PBXVI is still wearing the same ring that he wore prior to his renunciation of the ministry. Besides I know there are plenty of articles online saying that the fishermans ring was destroyed.
Is he right?
No, the ring was never destroyed. And the Ring of the Fisherman is not a Bishop’s Ring. It is the sign of ruling power of the Vicar of Christ, the Successor of St. Peter.
Ok, but is there proof of this? For example, pictures of the ring he wore before 2013 compared to now.
I have checked pictures online and it looks like the same ring.
Indeed Bishops rings are different from the Pope’s ring.
Pope Benedict never gave the Fisherman’s ring.
I guess that is the reason we a are given the photos of Pope Benedict XVI.
No matter how many assaults and confinement he suffered.
Don’t Bishops traditionally wear an amethyst (a semi-precious stone; which is not typically expensive ) ?
Yes fake is easy to spot by Catholic Leaders.
https://petercanisiusmichaeldavidkang.com/2013/03/01/the-ring-of-the-fisherman-or-the-fishermans-ring-pope-benedict-xvis-ring-as-pope/
https://petercanisiusmichaeldavidkang.com/2013/03/18/ring-of-the-fisherman-for-pope-francis-266th-pope-successor-of-st-peter-the-apostle-leader-of-the-universal-church/
Has no words, but maybe they were added later? Or maybe not? If not, it would certainly explain Bergoglio’s reluctance to allow anyone to kiss it, because that detail might be obvious to some …
Why would Pope Benedict XVI lie by wearing a ring that is not the real one? He is the true Pope. That is the true Pope wearing the ring that is a sign of his office.
Ratzinger Code: Benedict XVI’s “impeded ring” and Bergoglio’s fake one – Andrea Cionci
https://sfero.me/article/ratzinger-code-benedict-xvi-s-impeded-ring-and-bergoglio-s-fake-one