An Interview by Andrea Cionci
Authorized English Translation
(click on image above for Italian original)
On 29 June, precisely on the day of the 70th anniversary of the priesthood of Joseph Ratzinger, which is also the anniversary of Saints Peter and Paul, we received the answers of prof. Antonio José Sánchez Sáez , Professor of Law at the University of Seville (founded in 1505).
After Bergoglio’s drastic demolition of Summorum Pontificum – the most important act of Pope Benedict XVI’s pontificate which liberalized (dutifully) the Latin Mass – the mass par excellence, endowed with “absolute guarantees of catholicity” – is The time has come to propose this interview on a subject that – take note – all the media tend to avoid like the plague . Inexplicably, so too does a large part of the traditional-conservative world, which probably deludes itself into being able to combine agreements for the post-Bergoglio while ignoring the inevitable sword of Damocles of a natural anti-papal succession, in the case of Ratzinger’s invalid renunciation.
Yet, in a civilized country, there is talk, discussion, even harshly, but one confronts each other : dialogue, bridges, not walls. It would be desirable that someone could demolish this complete reconstruction of ours, but so far no one has succeeded, (and not even try): HERE
With 80 publications, various research stays at the Universities of Harvard, Bologna, Florence, Frankfurt, Sorbonne and 5 academic awards, Professor Sànchez has been writing for years on the Catholic website comovaradealmendro.es “. Currently, he is the university with the most authoritative curriculum. to have had the courage to “put his face to it”.
Professor, you have been saying for some time that you are following our investigation into the resignation of Benedict XVI …
R . “For many years, those who thought that the only reigning pope was Benedict XVI were alone, misunderstood by the Church. It is comforting to see how an important Italian newspaper has chosen to discuss this issue, which is fundamental not only for Catholics.
No other news organization talks about it, yet it should be the journalistic case of the millennium …
R . “The overwhelming majority think that card. Bergoglio is a bad pope, but ultimately the pope. They criticize his delusions, but consider him a father. And this strengthens it more. Others are simply worldly Catholics, happy with his innovations. Finally, others suspect that Francis is an impostor, but they don’t dare to talk about it in public ”.
From your website, you claim that ecclesiastical Freemasonry forcibly placed Bergoglio on the throne of Peter. What evidence?
R . “From the appreciation of the international lodges, to the inclusion of Masonic elements in the liturgy and devotion, to the rhetoric on the Universal Brotherhood … Suffice it to say, for now, that Father Malachi Martin, a highly cultivated Jesuit advisor to Card. Bea, who read the entire Third Secret of Fatima (including the words of Our Lady not yet revealed), wrote a book called “Windswept House” where she explained the plan of ecclesiastical Freemasonry: to force the pope to resign to impose a false pope who, exploiting the obedience of the clergy and the faithful, it will lead the Church to the great apostasy prophesied by St. Paul. What Malachi Martin did not know is that Benedict XVI had been prepared for some time and did not resign validly, remaining pope: a master’s game ”.
For what main reasons would your waiver be invalid?
R. “I was surprised when I calmly read your Declaratio di Renouncement in Latin: Pope Benedict did not renounce the munus, as required by canon 332.2 of the Code of Canon Law, but the ministerium. As if a professor resigned from teaching without leaving his chair, remaining a professor at the University. Furthermore, Benedict XVI has given us another clue by becoming “pope emeritus”, a canonically impossible title since to be emeritus it is necessary to have ceased from office by age or by accepted resignation … and neither of these conditions is met in resignation. of a pope (can. 185) “.
Do you think he did it on purpose? Perhaps, how does the well-known philosopher Giorgio Agamben ventilate to “strengthen the papacy”?
R. “I have read Agamben’s book“ The mystery of evil. Benedict XVI and the end of time “. I agree that Benedict XVI currently acts as a “katejon”, a “power that holds back” the revelation of the Antichrist (Massimo Cacciari also spoke of this). We know that Benedict XVI is perfectly familiar with the Marian messages of Fatima, Garabandal, Akita. He deliberately acted in this way, knowing that the wolves would come for him (because they had already done so against John Paul II). So he pretended to resign, but without doing so, remaining pope ”.
How do the Bergoglian canonists counter-argue?
R. “Basically they say that even if the renunciation were wrong, it is validated by the unanimous and peaceful acceptance of Francis by the Church (“Universalis Ecclesiae Adhaesio”). A tragic mistake, because this doctrine was never intended to save, heal or consider satisfied the condition without which a proceeding could never be initiated. In the case of papal election, the see must be vacant: the reigning pope must have died or must have validly abdicated. For can. 126 (doctrine of substantial error) Benedict’s resignation was void, the seat was not vacant and it is impossible to remedy this substantial error a posteriori. It does not matter that the overwhelming majority of the Church believes that the Pope is Francis: even the Jews preferred Barabbas to Jesus,but they were wrong ”.
In the interview book “Latest Conversations” Ratzinger says he resigned like the popes who, in history, have not abdicated. WHO If he is still the pope, who is Bergoglio?
R . “At least one ANTI-POPE . Moreover, many believe that he is the False prophet of the Apocalypse ”.
Many think that after Francis a new conclave can put things right. Is that so?
R. “Absolutely NOT . A conclave with 80 cardinals appointed by an antipope can elect only one other antipope. Bergoglio’s entire succession line is anti-papal. There will no longer be an ecclesial restoration, but a descent towards the great apostasy of the visible Catholic Church, which will persecute the faithful “little remnant”, the true Church ”.
By the way, Don Minutella’s channel, the most followed priest in Italy and loyal to Benedict, has been closed by Youtube or hacked … HERE
R. “Exactly. They need to silence dissent and make use of the complicity of social networks “.
The Catholics who are scandalized by Bergoglio’s “reforms” and avoid asking themselves if he is the real pope … do they evade the “magna quaestio”?
R. “Yes. Unfortunately, on this line of thought there are principles of the Church such as card. Sarah and Müller, Archbishop Viganó, etc. that confuse many people ”.
In a recent interview Fr Francesco recommended not to waste the crisis, but to use it to establish a “new world order”. Should we also worry about the laity?
R . “Obviously: this project concerns everyone. In particular, the UN for decades has been promoting what Catholics think are “sins that cry to Heaven” such as abortion, euthanasia or gender ideology. John Paul II and Benedict XVI already denounced it. And now Bergoglio is perfectly united with the New World Order, atheist, anti-Christian and asks for obedience to the UN ”.
Why don’t bishops and cardinals address this issue? It is an enormous historical and spiritual responsibility …
R. “The architects of the New World Order now dominate the world and the Church. Informed cardinals and bishops fear causing a schism if they speak out. But it is absurd to think that Christ can want unity in lies, for this reason, in history, the heretics have left the Church, purifying it. Now the schism will reverse: it will be those who profess the Catholic Truth who will be expelled from the Church ”.
Cionci: We had already mentioned this possibility with the metaphor of the “cuckoo” HERE For now the question continues to be swept under the rug, in a really curious way. There is an enormous difficulty in making a local mind trying to change point of view.Probably we will have to wait for the next stop of the modernist train, when also the Mass of the new rite, already tampered with, will undergo the next changes, predictably, with a view to eliminate the dogma of Transubstantiation as the historian Massimo Viglione explains HERE
When intercommunion with Protestants or even an international interfaith conference or something similar arrives to create the religion of the New World Order, then perhaps the most obvious of possible explanations will begin to be considered .
Dear Brother Alexis, great interview, thanks for posting.
Agreed as Professor Sanchez states, this is the great question of the day for Catholics. As Christ asked Peter, “Who do you say I Am?”
So too we must answer, whether now or later, here or in the hereafter, who do we say Bergoglio is.
I answer satanic anti-pope and false pope. SAP Francis for short.
Who else would dare to abrogate the Old Mass?
How could any true pope seek to abolish the Mass of the Saints and of the Ages. I’d like Trad Inc to answer that one question–Chris Ferrara? Michael Matt? Voris? FSSPX? N. B: The FSSPX starts its critique of Bergoglio’s latest, “Ass!Idiot!Destruction! aka Traditionis Custodes” (it’s an exact anagram—check it out yourself) with the words “Pope Francis.” Both documents thus start with a lie in their very first two words. Interesting confluence, the SSPX and SAP Francis.
Criminal usurper Antipope is also a 100% accurate description of SAP Francis because of his propensity to protect, enthrone establish and defend the clerical Homosexual Network Strangling the Church. SAP Francis promotes these criminals throughout the Church and protects them from criminal liability, as in the case of McCarrick and Ricca and Don Mercedes Inzoli and Zanchetta and Capozzi and Coccopalmiero et cetera et cetera et cetera…. Friend of SAP Gustavo Vera also comes to mind, who was escorted from the Casa Santa Marta by police and never returned.
False prophet forerunner of the Anti-Christ is highly likely true of Bergoglio as well, especially in view of his open manifestation as a satanist when he used the stang at Mass; and by his enthronement and worship of the pachamama/demon in the Vatican Gardens and in St Peter’s Basilica itself.
See here [ https://www.barnhardt.biz/2018/10/04/satanists-manifesting-antipope-bergoglio-carries-a-stang-the-ritual-staff-of-witchcraft/ ] for photo of Antipope Bergoglio carrying a Stang on October 3, 2018 in the Mass opening the Synod on Sodomy. What, exactly, is a STANG? “A Stang is a witch or warlock’s ceremonial staff. It is always forked, and always has an iron nail driven through it.” Google it, dude.
We could also note his support of prominent abortionists and infamous abortion proponents as well as sodomists like ‘Fr.’ James Martin SJ.
We could recall the holocaust of the Church in China, engineered by McCarrick/SAPFrancis/Parolin; and the cessation of the Mass worldwide for the first time in history, for a cold. These efforts were spearheaded by SAP Francis.
And finally, there is the assault on Holy Mother Church directly by SAP Francis’s war on the Sacraments, attacking priestly celibacy aimed to destroy the priesthood (again for which we have Pope Benedict to thank for thwarting with one of his three great interventions of the past eight years); and attacking the Eucharist and Matrimony in Amoralis Laetitia. In fact SAP Francis denies the very need for Sanctifying Grace in Amoralis Laetitia, which is its chief heresy.
Luther was more Christian than SAP Francis, because while Luther at least believed faith in Christ was necessary for salvation, SAP Francis denies that faith in Christ is necessary. SAP Francis also denies the existence of Hell (not that he believes that) and the immortality of the soul. (The Scalfari interviews.) And SAP Francis claims the One True God made men “that way” ie sodomitical (comments to Juan Carlos Cruz), and loves them that way. Sodom and Gomorrah and “one of the four sins crying to heaven for vengeance” notwithstanding.
All this is to disorient and mislead the faithful, us dumb sheep in the pew, to one place, and one place only.
Hell.
And that is why I call Bergoglio a satanic antipope. And I say it to his face, and to the face of any man priest or not who dares call him Holy Father and Pope. It’s so obviously detached from reality.
Don’t dare insult the true Holy father, Pope Benedict, by ceding his rightful title, throne, and office, to the imposter.
Yesterday in front of our congregation after the pastor referred to Bergoglio as “P-P-P-Pontiff(?),” I responded: Pontiff to Hell.
You got that right, Padre.
Fully agree, but the question is “how do we rid ourselves of this Apostate & his minions?”. The main contenders are –
1. A member of the prelature (or as many as possible) to call for the imperfect council we were promised after the Dubia was ignored to denounce JB & expel him & his illicit appointees to the College of Cardinals.
2. For a full investigation to be demanded by members of the Curia into the content of PBXBI’s resignation in Latin to finally rule on his denial of having abdicated the Papacy but only the Administration of the Church. He has constantly affirmed this stance since JB, through St. Gallen Group mafia, usurped the PO. The entire Catholic Church needs to know the reasons for a bifurcated papacy & the title “Pope Emeritus” which is not Catholic & no valid Pope can make it so.
3. A full investigation by Canon Lawyers into the election following PBXVI’s resignation of the ministerium whereby the Canons & Rules of PJPII on papal elections were totally ignored & which, if PBXVI’s contention that he still holds the Papacy is upheld, would make that election null & void & JB a formal Antipope.
Traduction française :
https://www.homelie.biz/2021/07/benoit-n-a-pas-abdique-bergoglio-est-un-antipape-declare-le-professeur-sanchez-juriste-a-l-universite-de-seville.html