Editor’s Note: I rarely publish articles about criminal attacks, but when the victims are fellow Franciscans and the attacker is an illegal, I cannot be silent. As the Left does in Europe, they are describing the attacker as “mentally unstable” and of “Spanish descent”.

However, in the above article they are clear that the Police are guessing at his age as either “30 or 40” years, which they would not have to do if he was a Spanish citizen or legal resident, since he would be documented. I think it is reasonable to conclude, then, that the attacker is an illegal, since a lot of individuals with mental health problems are being forcibly imported into Europe by human traffickers. He might also be a Muslim, but that he claims to be Jesus Christ makes me think that may not be so.

The Friar who died was 76 years of age, he was beaten in the head, and died later at hospital of his injuries. His Monastery — or more correctly, his Convent — is in Gilet, Spain, in the province of Valencia, where those inundating rain falls recently caused more than 200 moralities in flash flooding. The other friars attack are all over 70 and one is 95 years of age. Let us pray for these poor friars. May God have mercy upon all of them, and grant eternal rest to the one who was murdered in cold blood. He was most likely a priest.

Editor’s Note: If he wore a Cassock and insisted you accept the Council of Trent’s decrees, while offering the holy sacrifice of the Mass in the Ancient Roman Rite, you can be sure he would be called on the carpet for being a rigorist. So rigorism is out but tyrannical marxism is orthodoxy? Many Catholics are saying that the Vatican becomes a bigger joke day by day. It’s hard to disagree. — The article is biased, however, when it calls Cardinal Romero a “leading” African Cardinal. That’s hard to justify when he has less faithful under his diocese’s pastoral care than some priests in sub-saharan African have in their parish. His personal license, in addition, does not seem to be making him happier. He is only leading in his desire to break with what the Church has received from the past.

Commentary and a Response by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

Traduction Française

FromRome.Info is willing to quote anyone when they say something true or worthy of being noted down. Anthony Stine once said of FromRome.Info, that “I try to stay away from that website like the plague”. Seeing that the topic he speaks of in the above video published 4 days ago, has been covered by FromRome.Info since 2014, maybe I can expect him to stop by and post an apology in a comment here? Because, from what he says in the above video, it surely sounds like he might have caught the plague!

Yet, still, he does not ask for any specific real action be taken. He is still chasing the red-herring that holds that only the Cardinals can address the issue, a point which has no standing in canon law. — As I have said before, Pope Francis’ opposition merits the name “Gay”, because they all have the ability given by God to do something good for the Church, but they are obsessed by using that ability in all the wrong ways.

To make myself clear for record sake: these opponents speak of “imperfect councils” and “hypothetical conclaves”, but the correct tribunal is a Provincial Council in the ecclesiastical province of Rome and no Cardinal has the authority to convene such a council. All these opponents keep talking while refusing to even say the words, “The Sutri Initiative“, where sane honest Catholics who accept canon law and ecclesiastical history have already participated in, asking for the correct approach be taken.

I would encourage my readers to leave a comment on Dr. Stine’s YouTube Video and challenge him to say the words, “The Sutri Initiative” during his next video. My concern is not to have an apology from him; my concern is the salvation of the Church in our own days. He should be frank with his audience and admit the solution has to be canonical and that the Sutri Initiative is the only solution being proposed which actually cites the Code of Canon Law of 1983, promulgated by Pope John Paul II. He does not have to agree with it, but he should do the honest thing and inform his audience of its existence and let them make up their own minds. Let’s stop being gate-keepers against the truth!