Monthly Archives: February 2024

News

The Masonic Modus Operandi used to manipulate Catholic response to Vatican II

2 Comments

Episode III — On the Controlled Opposition in the Traditional Catholic Movement

A very curious thing happened in response to OMC Radio TV’s first show exposing the controlled opposition in Traditional Catholic “Leadership” in the last 70 years, which seems to indicate that traditionalist leaders in the USA may get weekly meetings with French Intelligence on how to conduct their leadership roles. — AJ and Br. Bugnolo go down the rabbit hole and talk about various facts which together indicate and demonstrate government control of and interference in the Traditional Catholic response to Vatican II during the last 70 years.

Watch Part II, HERE, and part I, HERE

Watch Part II by clicking above, or watch here:

News

First Things gaslights the Catholic World on ‘Fiducia supplicans’ heretical blasphemous sacrilege

4 Comments

Editor’s Note: No one but those who are ignorant of the fact that ‘First Things’ Magazine was founded by Skull and Bones members, will be surprised that they published Msgr. Feichtinger’s essay which by simply characterizing the document ‘Fiducia supplicans’ as simply  unclear, misguided, confused, imprudent and not workable, seeks to gaslight the Catholic world into thinking that it is certainly not heretical or doctrinally erroneous. — This is certainly not a misfire. It  is clearly an attempt to get Catholics to calm down and not even think of real Catholic responses such as the Sutri Initiative, which would remove the Globalist-Masonic assent, known as Pope Francis, from office.

But the heresy of saying the Divine Name can be invoked over “irregular couples” at any time is so profoundly opposed to True Religion expressed in the Second Commandment of the Decalogue (“Thou shalt not take the Name of the Lord in vain”) and the second invocation of the ‘Our Father’ (“Hallowed be Thy Name”) — the only invocation which directly refers to the Decalogue — that even toleration of ‘Fiducia supplicans’ or of anyone who has signed or approved it constitutes apostasy of the first degree, because it equates the intentional, public and priestly invocation of the Divine Name to approve of sin and to bless those who do the will of God. — This is why the CIA is now working overtime to get Catholics to calm down.

Church History, Debates, Ecclesiology, Moral Theology

Rev. Gommar de Pauw’s 1967 Letter to Pope Paul VI calling for abolition of Vatican II

1 Comment

Editor’s Note: For those Catholics who still cannot figure out why Kennedy Hall is so wrong about Vatican II and why he is wrong, I suggest you read this historical document: the letter of the Rev.  Gommar de Pauw, Doctor in Canon Law and Moral Theology, Professor at Mount Saint Mary’s Seminary, Head of Faculty, and Catholic priest for his entire life, to understand how a man who dedicated his entire life, soul, career and mind to the service of Christ and His Church speaks about Vatican II in its immediate aftermath. This will help you see who is the fool and who is the wise man.

And from this letter, I will dare to say, that Father de Pauw would agree with my assessment of Hall’s position on Vatican II as “blasphemous”, nonsensical and heretical.

Anthropology, News

Hallow Prayer App, founded by Alex Jones, backed by Diocese of Detroit

Leave a comment

Editor’s Note: As I remarked last summer, the greatest threat of social media to humanity lies in its effect to cause social isolation. God did not make man to relate to others through a device or app. Such a notion is as silly as writing a letter to someone sitting in the same room as yourself. If anyone did such a thing, it would surely be a sign of major problems as regards sanity and charity and honesty.

But as I mentioned in my article the other day, man is a plastic creature. The way we use any tool to communicate molds our minds even as we use our minds to control and use that tool. For devices which insist that we use them, when we do not need too, there is not just a danger of idolatry and enslavement, there is the absolute certainly of such dependency if we do not recognize the absurdity and insanity of such an insistence.

As regards prayer, to even conceive that an app can help people pray, when there are numerous websites containing prayers, meditations and even books by learned writers, popular writers and even Saints to encourage this, is to incline clearly towards the problem, not the solution. BECAUSE MAN DOES NOT NEED AN APP TO SPEAK WITH GOD.

It should surprise no one, therefore, that a fallen away Catholic is behind Hallow App (Alex Jones), the latest gimmick to help Catholics to return to a life of prayer. Nor does it come to me as a shock that Hallow inc. in 2022 worked with the Diocese of Detroit, which shut down its parishes at the request of the Scamdemic Narrative, the insistence of an antipope and the bribery of the U.S. Government.

By their fruits you will know them.

I think it would not be dishonest, but prudent, to recognize that this, like so many other proposals to get mankind and Catholics more hooked on electronic communication serves a purpose which has nothing to do with why God made man or for what God made man.

It is also curious that “Hallow” is a German-Jewish surname. But that must just be a coincidence (sarcasm).

You will hear more about the Hallow App shortly, as that corporation has purchased an advertisement spot on television in the USA, during the Super Bowl. It appears they also purchased an advertisement spot at Catholic News Agency:

News

Morrison: Pope Francis signed ‘Fiducia supplicans’ to weaponize his hatred for the Catholic Faith

Leave a comment

Editor’s Note: Here is another great psychological-ideological analysis of ‘Fiducia supplicans’, which leaves you without any guidance on how to personally react to the existential crisis in the Church caused by it.

This is standard “Recognize and Resist”, i. e. lament and do nothing, fake opposition.

When will the Remnant talk about the Sutri Initiative, which was published on October 19, 2023, two months before ‘Fiducia supplicans’ was published, and which enables Catholics in a valid canonical and juridical manner to do their part in curing the problem, by getting Pope Francis removed from office?

The Remnant needs to publicly take some side, for Bergoglio remaining in power, or against. Honesty in journalism does not remain silent about this, just like no man who knows his mother is being raped next door can satisfy himself with lamenting about the problem or describing it, without intervening at the risk of his own person, or at least calling the Police and asking for immediate intervention.

The Remnant began publishing in 1967, and to my knowledge has NEVER promoted a canonically valid petition to have Vatican II overturned or any errant pope removed from office. If I am wrong, I publicly ask to be corrected.

Here at FromRome.Info, I constantly offer practical ways for readers to respond to crises in the Church by action which addresses the problem. I do this so as not to rob them of the occasion of the grace of inspiration, hope, and good works, which the Holy Ghost always wills to inspired in souls. I hold that such a way of acting is true Catholic journalism in the cause of God, and I pray that Catholic journalists and influencers, one and all, come to see that this is essential to the ethical and moral responsibilities of their profession.

News

Rev. Gommar de Pauw, Denounces CIA/Vatican II Plot, in 1967 talk in Chicago

1 Comment

Editor’s Note: Click to watch video version of recorded audio. — This lecture is a condemnation of the entire project of Jorge Mario Bergoglio and his supporters.

Father De Pauw did not know that Vatican II was planned, funded and directed by the U. S. Government and its agents to destroy the Church from within, so he felt it necessary to say that the Council should not be rejected, but that Catholics should ask that its documents be withdrawn.

Father De Pauw attended the Second Vatican Council. He argues in this talk that all the worst and most erroneous and heretical proposals presented there at the Council were defeated at the Council. But after the council, the Aggiornamento sought to implement these defeated proposals.

In this talk, Father also recites what he believes is part of the Third Secret of Fatima.

Canon Law, Church History, Editorials

A Meditation for the 11th Anniversary of Pope Benedict XVI’s Renunciation of Ministry

4 Comments

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

Traduction française

It was 11 years ago, on February 11, 2013 A. D., at shortly after 11:30 A. M., that his Holiness Pope Benedict XVI read his now famous declaration, “Non solum propter”. — Above, if you click the image, you can access FromRome.Info’s complete Index to the history, debate and controversy over the events of that day and the meaning or effect of that declaration.

By that act he clearly and manifestly intended to retain the petrine munus and renounce only the petrine ministry, so that by retiring but not abdicating he could retain the Papal Dignity and Mandate, while conceding to his opponents the other powers of governance. While there are many, many opinions about the morality, intention, cause, motives and purpose of such an act, the juridical value of it was NOT and abdication.

But, for today’s anniversary, I want to offer a reflection on the moral errors committed in the Vatican before and during that controversy, which might help explain why even to this day, notable clergy incardinated at the Vatican, such as Cardinals Burke and Mueller, Brandmuller and Sarah, and even Archbishop Viganò seemingly find it impossible to admit their error in thinking he declared that he would abdicate from the Pontificate on that day.

As I have shown in my Index to Pope Benedict XVI’s renunciation, there are more than 53 errors in the Latin text Pope Benedict XVI read on that day. And why it has been admitted by experts at the Vatican, that Pope Benedict XVI wrote the text without any consultation with Canon Lawyers or Latinists, even Archbishop Gänswein admits there are errors in the text — though he has not yet had the charity to the Catholic world to admit which ones he recognizes.

Thus, the national Catholic newspaper in Italy, Avvenire, which is run by the Catholic Bishops’ Conference there, though they called me an “idiot” for claiming there are errors in the text, now has to eat crow. And yes, I still await an apology for their calumny, for the sake of removing the scandal they have placed before millions of souls.

But that they resorted to the services of a defrocked priest to gaslight the Catholic world about the deficiencies in the text, showed how desperate they were to keep the narrative of an abdication going, and how they knew all in their hearts, at least by 2021 that Benedict XVI never abdicated.

This collective sin and guilt and complicity is the principal embarrassment of the Catholic Hierarchy, not only in Italy but round the world. These men are pragmatic, and they realize that their moral authority over the faithful will be utterly destroyed when it comes to be known that they collectively were incapable of understanding how Canon 332 §2 worked and what was necessary for an abdication — a thing which should be a basic concept taught in a general Canon Law class on juridical acts.

So individuals who have doctorates in Canon Law such as Archbishop Gänswein really have no excuse. And there are 1000s like him, who were all silent. Though the worst sin was of those who should have known and attempted to defend the indefensible, namely, that a renunciation of ministerium in Latin signified a renunciation of munus.

But it was not I, but Cardinal Burke himself who immediately recognized that the declaration did not contain what it should contain to effect a valid abdication. He himself spoke to friends and acquaintances from Rome to Arizona about this. But he otherwise hid this opinion of his from the press. And I surmise that if he attempted to speak with Pope Benedict XVI before February 28, 2013, he failed in his request, because Pope Benedict XVI was not wont to speak with him about “canonical details”. The other Cardinals and clergy at the Vatican also failed, either out of human respect, or complicity in the plot by Hilary Clinton to push Pope Benedict XVI from power and have a new “spring time” in the Catholic Church.

I will guess too, without any evidence, that if there were a group of Cardinals and Bishops who realized the errors in the text in February 2013, they became conflicted in their private counsels, because they considered it somehow wrong to request that Pope Benedict XVI make a proper and correct renunciation on Feb. 28, 2013, to correct the errors of his Feb. 11th text. Indeed, for men like Cardinal Burke, it was his grave duty to make his way to Castle Gandolfo on Feb. 28th, with the proper text written on paper and carried in hand, to obtain an audience and insist Pope Benedict XVI sign the document in the presence of two other Bishops or Archbishops. Perhaps he was too unfit to climb to the balcony by rope ladder or thrown himself on the ground in front of the main door, to make a spectacle, to obtain this juridical rectification. We cannot judge the man on his personal sentiments, but all who knew of the defect should have had such a zeal.

Contrariwise, if anyone knew that the act of Pope Benedict XVI did not validly cause an abdication, or that Pope Benedict XVI knew, understood or did not understand this they had a grave solemn duty to announce this to the world as soon as they knew of it. Cardinal Burke did not do this. Why? Did the Cardinals discuss this in the canonically invalid Conclave of 2013 ? We may never know. But shortly after they came out of that “Conclave” we know that they had formed a silent eternal pact to never speak of this fraud perpetrated upon the Catholic World, because immediately the Vatican began publishing falsified translations in all major languages of the world, to conceal this from 1+ Billion Catholics. And this is the greatest crime against the rights of the Faithful in the entire history of the Church!

However, the official canonical and juridical declaration that ‘Pope Benedict XVI remained pope until his death’ is a question about which the Catholic Bishops of the Roman Province are competent to judge in a Provincial Council. Anyone can request them to do it. And all honesty requires that they,  who know of it, make such a request. Moreover, if they fail to rectify the historical and juridical record, those who know of it, who could be influential to obtain this, will go to their graves to encounter a most Terrible and unforgiving Judge, Whose Immaculate Bride has been raped and sullied by such a great injustice.

And yet, all those who insist that Bergoglio has never been the pope, fail to avail themselves of the most important confirmation of the invalidity of the Conclave of 2013, which they could obtain by the convocation of such a Council. Why is this? Those who insist he has always been the pope, also fail to seek this solution. Why?

So as we commemorate and remember that fateful day 11 years ago, we should make a renewed effort to admit the truth, connect the dots and study the sources, if we have not yet understood what really happened on that day and who is at fault for it.

And I encourage all the Catholics who have had the grace of the Holy Spirit to do this and complete this necessary task, to pray for all those who live within the ideological limits imposed upon by the boy’s clubs and magic circles in which they move, who out of human respect have preferred not to ask the question or worse to denigrate the messengers of truth, whom God has sent to His Church in the last 11 years.

Many have urged me to write a book about Pope Benedict XVI’s renunciation, but I make all the articles and videos available for free, because as a Franciscan Brother I realize that my vocation is to give freely, when one has received freely, and to work for the repair of Christ’s Church. — Of everything I have written and mentioned, here, you can find reference and articles in the above index. Just click the top image in this post.

FromRome.info is an electronic journal chronicling the events of the Church without keeping silent about the duty of Catholics to respond with faith-filled action, rather than as mere spectators. This article is one of more than 10,000 published since September 2013 A. D.. For more information about our journal, see our About Page.

News

Microsoft’s Artificial Intelligence at Bing.com won’t tell you who thinks the Pope is a heretic

Leave a comment

Editor’s Note: As I explained the other day, artificial intelligence is neither intelligent nor unharmful. — Today, I experimented over at Bing.com which claims to use A. I. to answer your questions, and lo and behold! — Their supercomputer and database of the entire web combined with their algorithm to prevent you from discovering reality, dishes up what the Globalists want you to find and not to find. In this case, they want you to think that there is no one in the world who calls Pope Francis a heretic.

The lesson to be learned here is that Pope Francis is a globalist puppet installed by Globalists, and any threat which would lead to his removal from power is considered a level red threat to the Narrative.

And our reaction to this realization should be to devote even more effort and resources to convincing others to join the Sutri Initiative and get him deposed as there raving heretic he is. — Catholics have already begun writing letters and sending them by mail and email. We need those of the faithful who are blessed by God with material wealth to fund lobbyists who will convince the Bishops of the Roman Province to respond with decisive action. For they can get rid of Bergoglio in less than 7 days of work. Keep that goal in mind as you contemplate what more God may be calling you to do for Holy Mother Church.

News

Cardinal Fernandez is attempting to out do Pope Francis

Leave a comment

Editor’s Note: Pope Francis has already earned the moniker as the “most hypocritical pope ever to reign” among millions of Catholics on account of his denunciation of sins and vices in which he is glaringly proficient and complicit. But it seems that Cardinal Fernandez is zealous to imitate his master, Jorge Mario Bergoglio, in this vicious practice, as the above news article reports. And this from a man who attempted to abuse the entire Catholic world by writing blasphemous and heretical pornography about Jesus Christ having sex with a minor on a beach — a scene he claims he took from another writer — though many in the Church consider it highly probably that the Cardinal is a raving sodomite who fantasizes about having sex with Our Lord — a thing which would be the ultimate abomination of sodom.

The reason why these two men are involved in such hypocrisy is that they are such dark and twisted characters, that they hope that if on Day A their perversity  in doctrine and morals becomes evident, that on Day B they can say something which appears Catholic or honest, so that Catholics in the world might not think so bad of them.

Ecclesiology, News

Why, after ‘Fiducia supplicans’ all the Faithful can now legitimately refuse obedience to Pope Francis

14 Comments

By Br. Alexis Bugnolo

Traduction français

Obedience as a virtue inclines us to reverently, respectfully and dutifully comply with the will of one who holds legitimate authority when he expresses that will with a command, whether prohibiting or ordaining, instructing or governing action.

In truth, only a legitimate superior commanding what is legitimate is owed obedience. Someone pretending to be your superior ought never be obeyed. And any true superior commanding what is unjust or dishonest should never be obeyed.

In the Catholic Religion, which is the only true religion revealed by God, the legitimate and true superior of all things, as Creator and Lord, obedience is owed always and unconditionally to God alone.

Next, a conditioned limited obedience is owed to God’s authentic representatives communicating the decisions of the Divine Majesty. Thus, in accord with the ability of that communication to be authoritative and clearly manifest, we owe obedience to Jesus Christ, Who is God Incarnate, with supreme authority, first of all. Then, to those whom Christ has placed over us, that is, the Apostles He chose while on Earth or commissioned after His Resurrection, which is Saint Paul, alone. And because the Apostles had the grace of infallibility and impeccability their teachings and governing decisions — but not their personal behavior — is a perennial and unchanging rule for all generations. This is called Apostolic Tradition.

Next we owe a limited and conditional obedience to those who hold the offices which the Apostles established, during the tenure of their offices. Thus, we obey the Bishop of our diocese, the pastor of our church, etc.. These offices are part of the Ecclesiastical Hierarchy.

But there is an office which shares in both the Ecclesiastical Hierarchy and Apostolic authority, and that is the office of the Roman Pontiff. And because it shares in both, the obedience we owe the Roman Pontiff is in certain things more obligatory than all others, but in other things equally conditioned and limited.

Now when a Roman Pontiff governs in harmony with the will of God as expressed in revelation (Divine Tradition) and in accord with the will of the Apostles (Apostolic Tradition) all Catholics have the duty to obey him, when he commands a thing which pertains to our salvation. Thus, if he commands that a sacrament is to be received in such a manner, but not if he command that a certain basilica should alone celebrate the Rosary at 5 P. M..

However, when a Roman Pontiff does not govern in harmony with either the will of God as expressed in revelation or contrary to the teaching of the Apostles, he must not be obeyed, for to do so would be a mortal sin.  He must not be obeyed, I say, in the things which he commands which are contrary to these two parts of the Deposit of the Faith.

There is even still a greater obligation of Catholics to NOT obey a Roman Pontiff if he would act to destroy souls, by forbidding, obstructing, depriving, denying, or forbidding any thing or act which is conducive to salvation. Thus the Roman Pontiff must not be obeyed if he were to forbid the recitation of the prayer of the “Our Father”, or alter its text in a manner which alters its signification.

Thus, most Catholics in Italy sinned gravely when they accepted the formulae for the Our Father, issued by Pope Francis, where the words, “lead us not into temptation” where replaced with “do not abandon us in temptation”, even if they thought he was the Pope when he so commanded — which he was not because Pope Benedict XVI never renounced his office.

But a Pope must not be obeyed in anything when he clearly and manifestly is habitually opposed to the will of God in anything which is necessary or conducive to salvation.

The reason for this is that by his grave habitual public deviation from the will of God, nothing which emanates from him as teaching or governance can be free from a perverse defect, arising from his habitual deviation.

And such is the present public and manifest state of soul of Pope Francis, having signed ‘Fiducia supplicans” and having steadfastly refused to withdraw his approval, after being rebuked by thousands of Catholic Bishops, and tens of thousands of Catholic priests world wide, not to mention millions of the faithful.

The manifest deviation from the faith was clear on September 29, 2023, when he instructed Cardinal Fernandez to respond to the devious reply he gave to the 5 Cardinals in their recent Dubia. This pertinacity and perversity was made even more certain and malign by his publication of the heretical and blasphemous ‘Fiducia supplicans’ on Dec. 18, 2023.

And since that time he has not only refused public and private correction, he has even doubled-down upon it by insulting the entire Catholic world with petulant impish outbursts during public talks.

For this reason, whether a Catholic believes that pope Francis has lost his office by reason of heresy or schism, in the sight of God, or not, all Catholics are now obliged to NOT obey Pope Francis in anything until he repent, for otherwise they would become morally complicit in tolerating what can never be tolerated: the grave public abuse of the office of the Roman Pontiff by a man who is habitually opposed to the will of God in a grave matter, the observance of the 2nd Commandment of the Decalogue, which requires that Christians keep holy the Name of the Lord, never using it to approve of evil or vanity.

Likewise, with this obligation to not obey comes the grave obligation upon all Catholics to call for his public and solemn rebuke or reprehension, and/or removal from office, if he refuse rebuke or correction.

Catholics have already begun to request this action against Pope Francis in the Sutri Initiative. Let us all call upon everyone to do the same for the sake of Christ and the salvation of the world. Catholics are already refusing obedience world wide on account of the impeded state of the Apostolic See, as I explain here. — Keep talking about both to everyone, especially clergy; and in particular those dioceses or parishes where any statement approving of ‘Fiducia supplicans’ has been published or issued.

I urge you to not let anyone lull you into silent toleration of this man’s sin or convince you that the only response of the Catholic is to lament and tolerate it. If we do not begin and continue to publicly rebuke this man and express our rights to refuse obedience to him on account of the magnitude of his sin, not only will his soul have no remedy of correction, but the bad example he is giving will spread to the entire Church, depriving us of the Mercy of God and the grace of final perseverance. This is no small thing. And no Catholic who knows of this scandal can be saved if he remains silent and does not act.

Indeed, every Catholic “influencer” who leaves aside this controversy or who does not urge action shows by this very thing that he poorly understands the Faith and cares but little for the dignity of the Divine Majesty, the salvation of souls, or the ethical duty he has toward you, his reader or listener. Don’t dally with such fools, for they are leading you astray.

FromRome.info is an electronic journal chronicling the events of the Church without keeping silent about the duty of Catholics to respond with faith-filled action, rather than as mere spectators. This article is one of more than 10,000 published since September 2013 A. D.. For more information about our journal, see our About Page.

Anthropology, Editorials

The “Catholic Spirit” gaslights the Catholic world about the immorality of Artificial Intelligence

4 Comments

Commentary and Critique by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

In the last year a great number of publications have pushed the narrative of A. I. as man’s greatest invention which will transform our lives forever. The journal, “Catholic Spirit”, the Catholic newspaper published by the Archdiocese of Minneapolis and Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA, recent published this article extolling the morality of the new software technology.

I have not weighed much into this debate, but as a graduate of the University of Florida Gainesville, from one of the top 10 faculties of Cultural Anthropology in the United States, and as one of the leading translators of medieval texts in Scholastic Theology, who has run numerous websites and written code for decades, I believe I have the moral duty to speak out on the grave threat to human civilization from the so-called “artificial intelligence” technologies and narratives.

First, there is no such thing as artificial intelligence. Intelligence is impossible without God willing to grant an entity the ability to understand. This grant is twofold, in the structure of the being of the thing He has created, and in the Light he bestows upon that being to see and grasp the truth of things.

Man can neither create a structure capable of knowing nor can he give it light to see the truth.

“Artificial intelligence” therefore, as a name, is a lie.

It is also an ongoing fraud. Because it is proposed by many as the solution to man’s problems which is entirely beneficial.

To understand this we must first consider what intelligence is and how it is beneficial to man.

Intelligence is the ability to know with understanding. Knowing is the material part. Sense can know things, that is be familiar with them. Even a camera in this sense can know things by taking a photograph. This kind of knowing is signified in the Latin verb, cognoscere. Even dogs and cats know things. But it would be more accurate to say know of things.

But nothing but a being with an intellect can understand things. To understand is to recognize the principles which are the cause of things, according to its essence, nature, existence and habits. But to do this one must have an ability which can step out of space and time and look back down upon them to see the truth of a thing. But this requires a simplicity which is entirely apart from space and time and matter. Thus only God, Angels and men are intelligent.

But God did not bestow intelligence upon Angels and Man out of a whim. No, being perfect Truth and infinite Goodness, everything He has done He has done with a purpose. And that purpose is to share the participation in His Goodness with certain specific creatures: those which are intelligent. The Angels to serve Him, since they are the most like unto Him, being pure spirits themselves. And Man to serve Him, since to express His infinite Goodness in the most supreme manner, He chose to become Incarnate as a Man, and intelligent man.

But God has no other purpose in creating. Therefore, there is neither any other intelligent life in all the universe, nor any possibility of any other species or entities attaining intelligence.

Because intelligence is not a good like being warm or hot, living or reproducing. It is for one supreme purpose: knowing and loving God, the Creator.

Intelligence thus is something purely spiritual. And since man can not create anything material, much more can he not create anything spiritual.

Thus the claims of “artificial intelligence” are a fraud. And such a horrible and profound fraud as to border on a heresy.

Consequently the proponents of “artificial intelligence” are necessarily involved in an idolatry. And an especially harmful idolatry, because not only an idolatry which enslaves man, but one which aims to denigrate him in his highest natural capacity: thought itself.

For these reasons it is not surprising that all men who have already enslaved themselves to subhuman vices of lust and greed and pride, are flocking to the new cult of “artificial intelligence” as the promised god to give them what they insatiably desire.

But this idolatry is especially harmful to human civilization, because as human beings we are plastic creatures. It is necessary for our spirit that we grow in learning and to do this that we in practice use our minds, memories, intellects to think and understand and become cognizant of the world in which we live so that through that we come to contemplate, worship and adore the God who created it, seek Him out and do His will.

But the false gospel of “artificial intelligence” which promises facility in doing and thinking and problem solving, will necessarily cause an ossification or lack of growth in the mental faculties of all who use it. Because they will use it out of sloth instead of using their own faculties. And by such a habitual avoidance of the work of the mind, they will become incapable of wanting to think on their own.

And such a bad habit will necessarily reduce them to the level of dogs and cats, where there is no understanding, only the response to stimuli, interior and exterior to the body.

And that will be the end of human civilization.

Also, by such habituation, human individuals will become more and more desirous to have technology implanted into their minds to give them even more facile access to A. I.. And once they do, they will no longer be doing any thinking, A. I. will do it for them. And then they will no longer live as humans, but robots.

For those who appreciate what is really means to be human, it is already manifestly evident how ugly, cruel and death-filled the products of A.I. are: from images to written texts, the things A. I. creates are without any comprehension of the variety of details found in real life and real art; without any comprehension of human individuality or spiritual values.

But there is an even greater threat by A. I. that its products or its use by individuals, because humanity requires and includes community and social interaction. And by the habitual use of A. I. this will come to disappear, as human individuals spend more and more time interacting with something dead, rather that with one another and in prayer with God.

Thus, the “Catholic Spirit” does a great disservice to the Church in publishing the nonsense contained in the article above, with its shallow reflections on utility and its even shallower appreciation of the existential threat to humanity posed by these technologies.

A. I. is the Globalist replacement for God. For those who reject the true God to rule over them, the Globalist are creating a god to rule under them and inside of them.

And it is precisely those who wish to understand who alone will see how utterly evil and demonic and inhuman A. I. .is, and why as a civilization we must reject and destroy it or it will destroy us.

 

News

NIGERIA: Bishops of Ecclesiastical Province of Lagos reject ‘Fiducia supplicans’

Leave a comment

Editor’s Note: Each spring, normally during Lent, the Bishops of each ecclesiastical province hold an informal meeting to discuss issues. While their decisions have no canonical force, the often take this occasion to issue joint pastoral statements. Thus, in the next 90 days we are likely to see many Ecclesiastical Provinces issue statements about Pope Francis ‘Gay Blessings’ document, which while authored by Cardinal Fernandez, is clearly part of Pope Francis’ core agenda for destroying the Catholic Church at the request of the CIA.

News

Vatican & Italy agree to move Bambino Gesu Hospital HQ to ex-Forlini Hospital in SW Rome

Leave a comment

Editor’s Note: The Bambino Gesu Hospital, one of the major Catholic institutions of Rome run by the Vatican, which brings in huge profits due to its reception of funds for medical care from the Italian Republic has agreed to move to the former Forlini Hospital site in SW Rome. — One wonders why the Italian Republic, which pushed the DeathVaxx even to children, would want a Children’s Hospital adjacent to their national center for infectious disease research, just a block away. — For my part, I would strongly urge all parents in the City of Rome to NOT take their children to the new Bambino Gesu Hospital, for any hospital which was complicit in the Scamdemic Genocide has no medical ethics at all. — The Hospital ‘Bambino Gesu’ is named after the Child Jesus, was founded in 1869. You can read more about it here.

News

Crisis Magazine declares that Vatican II is “Tradition”, and that opponents “just don’t get it!”

5 Comments

Editor’s Note: This article wins the “Gaslighter of the Month” award. It is written by Kennedy Hall, an ex-TV cable repair man, who, to my knowledge has 0 credentials of any kind to speak about Church news. — Over at OMC Radio TV, AJ and I have spoken about our wonderment that this man’s opinions were being promoted by what seemed to be very important Catholic influencers, since he is literally another Canadian nobody.

So today’s article is not a surprise to me. When you are promoted beyond your merits in today’s social media metaverse, there are big players behind you.

So to castigate Traditional Catholics for not “getting it”, that Vatican II is part of the “Tradition” of the Church and all we need is to find the “good spirit” of Vatican II is the gaslighting it appears he was promoted to push, along with his beard, and perhaps a pipe for motiff — since the “trad” “dad” social media type has these things.

But his article reads more like a child’s essay in elementary school about finding the good fairy who will save us from the bad fairy.

The truth is, rather, that Vatican II was cooked up in Washington, D. C., its agenda was written by Freemasons, and the “Spirit of Vatican II” was a narrative motif invented by Time/Life Magazine at the direction of the CIA.

For serious Catholics, the truth about Vatican II has been explained by Professor David Wemhoff, in his historic masterpiece, “Time  Life and the American proposition”, where he was the first to expose the U.S. Government plot to destroy the Catholic Church from within. His book was featured extensively in a series at OMC Radio TV, and FromRome.Info was the first Catholic journal to publish the Department of Defense Document detailing the Ideological Warfare Program’s goals and agenda against the Church, declared on June 29, 1953 and declassified 66 years and 6 months later in 2013, after Bergoglio usurped the Papacy.

News

The NCR continues to gaslight the Catholic World about Pope Francis’ impenitence

1 Comment

Editor’s Note: Another shameful article from the National Catholic Register — owned an operated by EWTN — gaslighting the Catholic world. In this one, by Fr. de Souza, we are expected to embrace the wonderful “Reset at the Vatican” which Pope Francis undertook after a spirit of recognition that his ‘Gay Blessings’ initiative had failed miserably, and that he is now a changed and humble man. — I exaggerate, but that is the spirit of the article.

The contrary is in fact the truth. Pope Francis has double, triple and quadrupled down on his heretical profession, going so far as to insult the entire Catholic world for being hypocrites. Second, Cardinal Fernandez document on the validity of the sacraments is, as I have shown, a clever trick to set up the basis for a total destruction of the liturgy. And third, Pope Francis’ letter to the Jews was a horribly vicious twisting of Catholic morality and world history, as I explained here.

No, the CIA Plan for the destruction of the Church, goes one. Jorge Mario Bergoglio is their agent, and until we all want to remove him, it won’t get done. That is why the controlled opposition wants you only to lament, then calm you down, and then accept in silence that revolution. They do it every time. Maybe this time you will notice.

News

Vox Cantoris: “Bergoglio thinks we’re stupid!” — FromRome.Info: “And he’s right!”

3 Comments

Commentary by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

Over at Vox Cantoris, a blog published by a feisty Catholic from Toronto, Canada, David Doment, you can often read sharp and clear judgements against the tricks of Jorge Mario Bergoglio and his like in the Catholic Hierarchy of Canada.

I interviewed David back in March of 2015, and you can read that interview here. Mr. Domet became famous for his opposition to Fr. Roscia, one of the leading Bergoglian gaslighters, in the early years of the latter’s antipapacy.

But in yesterday’s post David Doment asks a powerful question which should not be taken merely rhetorical: “Does he think we are stupid?”

That is, does Pope Francis think we are so stupid as to believe the twisted explanations  he gives for his ‘Gay Blessings’ agenda?

Vox Cantoris (Latin for “The voice of the Cantor”) clearly holds to a negative response, because by now most Catholics are totally disgusted and aware of the tricks of the Argentine Supreme Clericalist.

But I will demur, and respond in the positive, and I think I am more correct.

Because he has been playing these games and tricks for 10 years and Catholics still won’t do anything to remove him from power, oppose him and organize opposition to him.

That is, they won’t participate in calling for a Provincial Council in the Roman Province to depose him for an invalid claim to the Papacy. They still cannot figure out if the Conclave of 2013 was canonically valid or not. They still cannot figure out what is to be done with an apparently heretical and schismatic and apostate man on the Throne of Saint Peter.

I would say, that all those are massive failures on the part of Catholics, not just on the part of the Catholic Hierarchy.

And thus, the evidence is, and one must conclude, that whether Pope Francis thinks we are stupid or not, We ARE STUPID!

But not all of us. Because Catholics are waking up and participating in the Sutri Initiative, by writing the Bishops in the Roman Province and demand that this man be put on trial. And the Bishops of the Province have already shown that they are listening (see here and here for more information).

So my point is, if bloggers everywhere, whether influential like David Domet or not, called on their readers to participate, the protest to obtain the only real solution to the Crisis in the Church would succeed, in my opinion.

And if they don’t, I won’t say that they are being stupid; but it is clear that they are allowing themselves be played by one who thinks they are.