Monthly Archives: January 2024

Editorials, Faith, Moral Theology, News

Fiducia supplicans is a Diabolic attack on the 2nd Commandment of the Decalogue

7 Comments

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

Traduction française

From our earliest days in Catechism class we learn that God gave to Moses on Mount Sinai 10 laws or commandments which obliged every man, woman and child everywhere and for all times. The keeping of the 10 Commandments — also known as the Decalogue, from the Greek for “the 10 Words or Sayings” — is the most fundamental condition for being a friend of God, as Christ Jesus teaches, “If you love Me, keep My Commandments” (John 14:15).

The 2nd Commandment Revealed to Moses

You can find the text of the 10 Commandments in two places in the Old Testament: in the Book of Exodus 20:2-17, which Moses wrote to record the Passover of the Hebrews from the slavery of Egypt to the religious liberty of the promised Land; and in the Book of Deuteronomy 5:6-21, where Moses writes them down a second time, as he recounts in his final years, the wondrous deeds the Lord had done.

In the Catholic Church, we number the Commandments in a synthetic manner, following neither the numerical order found in the Book of Exodus nor in the Book of Deuteronomy, since as a didactic method, the Doctors and Fathers of the Church had reordered them in proper theological order, for memnotic sake.

So, the Second Commandment reads in our Catechisms, “Thou shalt not take the Name of the Lord in vain.” — This corresponds to Exodus 20:7, which reads in the Douay Rheims English translation:

Thou shalt not take the Name of the Lord thy God in vain: for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that shall take the Name of the Lord his God in vain.

And to the Deuteronomy 5:11, which reads in the same translation:

Thou shalt not take the Name of the Lord thy God in vain: for he shall not be unpunished that taketh His Name upon a vain thing.

Why does God command the proper use of His Own Name?

From the two scriptural verses we see that the universal prohibition of the misuse of the Divine Name is founded upon the same moral principal: Yahweh, the one true God, is Our God and Lord, and therefore we must show the obedience of faith in the respect of that Word which names Him as such.

As Saint Bonaventure explains in his commentary on the First Book of Master Peter Lombard, God is called “God” because that word names Him, the Eternal Infinite Being. In English, our word, “God” names Him not as the eternal infinite being, but as the One who is invoked in prayer — this is the origin of the Old Germanic word, “God”.

Again, as St. Bonaventure teaches in the same place, but God is named “Lord” no on account of being God, but on account of creating creatures, because there is no one in God who is subjected to another, as a servant is to a Lord, or who has superiority as a Lord does to a servant. And so, before God created, He was never called Lord. But with the creation of Angels and men, God is now called, “the Lord” because He is the One who made all things.

And this is why God says to Moses, “I am the Lord, thy God. … Thou shalt not take the Name of the Lord thy God in vain.”

Misusing the Divine Name is the worst of Sins

According to the two passages of Scripture, we can see that the misuse of God’s Name can never be without guilt and will never go unpunished. From this teaching the Saints and Doctors of the Church explain that blasphemy against God is punished the worst and most by God than all other sins. That means it is far worse a sin that adultery or murder or theft. And this is because it is a sin against God Himself, Who is of infinite dignity, majesty and holiness.

Now to take the name of the Lord “in vain” means to do so unnecessarily, that is when there is no need to name Him. Because one should not use a name of anything, except to name it; so one should not use the name of a person, except to name him. — For example, no one shouts out, “Thomas Aquinas!’ when he smashes his finger, accidentally, while misusing a hammer. For there is no purpose in naming the Dominican Saint at such a moment.

All the more reason, we should NEVER utter the Name of God without the purpose of referring to Him or invoking Him. So important is this, that in the Book of Job, God praises Job and not his learned friends who spoke so eloquently about God and His justice. As Peter Kreft says: this is because Job’s friends named God to talk about Him; but Job named God to talk to Him.

Invoking God’s Name to approve of evil is an even worse Sin than misusing It

So we can imagine how great the sin is, if we were to use the Name of God in something that is not only useless, but evil, sinful, or even worse to approve of evil or sin!

That is the spiritual equivalent of rubbing the Divine Face into the mud of moral depravity.

And this sin becomes all the greater, if one not only names God with the word, “God’ or its equivalent, but when one uses the revealed names of God, such as “Yahweh” or “Jesus” or some other revealed name such as “Sabaoth”, “El Shaddai”.

And this sin would be even greater if the person misusing the Name of God to approve of sin or evil, had the dignity of one of God’s Ambassadors, as does every Bishop and priest of the Catholic Church.

But Fiducia supplicans is the worst sin ever in world history against the Divine Name

But though we can imagine such a horrific and monstrous perpetration of such a horrible sin; Fiducia supplicans goes way beyond this in moral depravity.

Because in Fiducia supplicans, we not only have advocated that Catholic Bishops and priests approve of sinful unions or sinful despair with the imposition of a blessing which invoked the Divine Name by His sacred ambassadors, but we have also the attempt by the arguments it contains to convince the world that such is not only morally licit, but the more perfect fulfilment of the Gospel of Our Lord Jesus Christ!

Fiducia supplicans, therefore, is a document straight out of the inferno. It is the consummate violation of the Second Commandment of the Decalogue and is certainly worthy of the Antichrist in the universal attempt it is making to overthrow the House of God and the Pillar of Truth, which is the Church.

And for this reason, Fiducia supplicans not only must be entire rejected and condemned, but all those who adhere to it in any way, should be sternly warned of their eternal damnation and the pending Divine Vengeance which they have merited by accepting, agreeing, praising or tolerating it.

Credits: Hell depicted in mosaic in the Baptistry of the Catholic Cathedral of Florence, Italy. The image shows Satan devouring souls and bodies in the Inferno.

News

VATICAN: Papal Spokesman denies Benedict XVI was coerced to resign

Leave a comment

Editor’s Note: Catholic Conclave has reproduced in English the Facebook comment by Andrea Tornielli, the Vatican Spokesman, who published a long comment about the failed abdication of Pope Benedict XVI, which is mostly a rant. — It appears Tornielli is responding to pressure from Andrea Cionci’s faction of B16 Sedevacantists, which keep urging the issue, which is gathering consideration from many because of its apparently facile way of removing Bergoglio from the Papacy after the publication of Fiducia supplicans. — Catholic Conclave is about 5 years behind the time on this issue however, but he has done a public service by documenting Tornielli’s recent denials.

News

Queen of Denmark to abdicate on 14th of January — Correctly uses Future Tense

1 Comment

Editor’s Note: Catholics round the world need to thank the Queen of Denmark this week for having correctly announced that She “will” abdicate on January 14th, next. By not following Pope Benedict XVI in an abdication in the present which will have effect only in the future (which is null and void), She has shown the world the right way to go about it. Let’s see if on the 14th she reads a text of abdication, to seal the deal. — If so, then Her example can be cited for future reference to all Cardinals, Bishops, Priests and Laity, who still insist Pope Benedict XVI abdicated in 2013, even though he read aloud no such text, on no such day of that year.

News

VATICAN: Cardinal Fernandez issues press release to confirm Fiducia supplicans is Heretical

2 Comments

Commentary by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

Beginning with the psychotic ideological assertions, that the opposition from more than 1000 Bishops world wide must not be considered “doctrinal opposition”, the press release issued this morning at the Vatican then descends down its own rabbit holes.

In a stunning revelation of the level of episcopal push back, the Press Release explicitly rebuts the charge of “heretical” content.

Evidently, there is no room to distance ourselves doctrinally from this Declaration or to consider it heretical, contrary to the Tradition of the Church or blasphemous.

A denial which juridically makes the case against Cardinal Fernandez and the document all the more serious, since he has refused publicly a correction on a matter of revealed truth. He is now a formal pertinacious heretic.

Aside from the fact that a press release is written in the First Person Plural, it is clear that Fernandez is attempting to smear his culpability onto all the members of the Dicastery while telling everyone what to think! — That may work in the Hall of a Peronist Dictator, but it’s not going to have legs in public debate.

The Press Release then admits that Fiducia supplicans cannot be put into practices effectively until local conditions allow, implying that the purpose of the document is to break down good morals and foster scandals. It also implies that Catholics of Africa are somehow culturally backward for being faithful to Jesus Christ and the institution of Marriage.

Cardinal Fernandez then allows all priests to practice such discernment in loco, that is, in each place. He is using the word loco incorrectly: he is a raving loco heretic.

The Press Release then drops the bomb. For it declares that the teaching contained in Fiducia supplicans by which novelty — it admits its a novelty — one distinguishes between two different kinds of blessings — must be accepted by the whole Church, since it is part of the personal magisterium of Pope Francis. — Nonsense! And pure Bunk!

In fact, as all theologians know, novelty is the hallmark of heresy. Catholic truth is never novel.

It then double downs on its heretical depravity by insisting that Bishops cannot forbid all blessings for sodomitic couples.

Then after denying the non-ritualized form of blessings are identical to ritualized form, the Press Release offers a ritualized form of spontaneous blessing for those in “irregular” (read sinful) situations (read “sexual relationships”)!

It closes by asking Catholics to read its ideologically heretical denial of the order of Creation and Salvation “without ideology” and calmly!

The Press Release has thus, become Evidence item #2 of the heretical depravity of Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez.

 

 

News

Sutri Initiative’s first fruits

5 Comments

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

I have it that the petitions received for the Sutri Initiative are already having a great effect on the mindset of the Bishops of the Roman Province. The publication of Fiducia supplicans having removed all masks of pretense, it is now clear to the better part of them, that the Apostolic See is occupied by a man who is doubtfully Catholic.

Thus, the Bishops are waking up to the fact that they have, in the authority of the Provincial Council, an awesome duty and means to finally solve the problem of the Church!

Keep writing your letters!

Join the Sutri Initiative if you have not already done so!

News

Did Pope Francis sign Fiducia supplicans so that he could marry Cardinal Fernandez?

10 Comments

Edtior’s Note: At Germinans Germinabit, the implications of Fiducia supplicans are considered in depth. I believe the author is correct in stating that the motive of many ecclesiastical parasites in praising this document is that they want to openly get approval for their sodomitic unions. — As an anthropologist, therefore, I have to consider the possibility of personal motive also in publishing the document, why Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez would risk the ridicule of the world for something from which they gain no profit as a couple?

In any event, every Cardinal, Bishop, Priest, Deacon and religious brother or sister who has praised or accepted this document needs to be expelled from their offices and religious orders and reduced to the lay state. They should be permanently banned from getting anywhere near children, beaches, ministries or public latrines or bath houses.

News

The Wonderful Days of the Child of Bethlehem

3 Comments

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

It’s a wonderful endeavor to investigate the life of Jesus, for in it one discovers many hidden truths.

As I mentioned in my article on Dec. 25th, Christ was born on Dec. 25, 2. B.C., and circumcised on January 1, 1 B.C.. He celebrated His First Birthday on January 1, A. D..

But two dates which are important for our consideration most of all are the Day Christ was born and the Day He received the Holy Name of Jesus.

We can calculate these from the fact easily found on the internet, that January 1, 1 A.D. was a Saturday.

That means that January 1, 1 B.C., the year before, fell on a Friday. which in turn means that Dec. 25, 2 B.C., was a Thursday.

So the amazing truths to be gathered are this.

THE BREAD WHICH CAME DOWN FROM HEAVEN WAS BORN ON A THURSDAY. ON A THURSDAY HE CAME FORTH FROM THE TABERNACLE OF THE ARK OF THE COVENANT, OUR LADY.

THE LAMB OF GOD FIRST SHED HIS BLOOD ON A FRIDAY. AND ON A FRIDAY WAS HE FIRST OFFERED TO THE ETERNAL FATHER AS HIS BORN SON.

Credits: Featured image from Vectezy.

Editorials

The publication of Fiducia supplicans is the long desired dream of Frankist Jews

17 Comments

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

In the 17th century, in Asia minor (what is now Turkey), a Sephardic Jew by the name of Sabbatai Zevi (1626-1676) put himself forward as the Messiah promised by God. Nearly 90% of all Jews on earth came to believe in his claims, until the Ottoman Sultan gave Zevi an ultimatum: convert to Islam or be put to death.

Zevi, being a religious charlatan of the highest grade, converted to Islam.

As a consequence, his followers were so scandalized that they repudiated the Mosaic Covenant. These followers are known as Sabbatean Jews: today they form the three major groups of Jews, known as the Conservatives, the Orthodox and the Reformed. Amazingly none of these require their believers to believe that the things which are historically related to have happened in the Old Testament really did happen.

But the Sabbateans did not give up religion: they still wanted the Messiah to come, but they believed that to force God’s hand they would now have to violate the Mosaic Law and to spread its violation through the world. In this way, they hoped God would arise as avenger and destroy the enemies of the Jews.

A century later a large group of Sabbateans, in Eastern Europe now, began to convert to Christianity with the purpose of infiltrating Christian churches and destroying them from within. This group is known as the Frankists, from their founder Jacob Frank, a Sabbatean Jew, who lead his followers to convert to Catholicism and join the ranks of the ruling class in the Commonwealth of Poland, but who was later arrested for heresy and imprisoned in the Monastery of Częstochowa for 13 years. His spirituality’s goal was to so morally debase his followers in sexual orgies that only God could save them from their slavery and degradation. See more here.

Frankists today are a highly secretive organization. If their websites or blogs are discovered they quickly disappear. According to reports received by FromRome.info the majority of Catholic Bishops in the Roman Rite, in Eastern Europe, are Frankists. it is highly likely that John Paul II had Frankist forebears. Karol Wotyla reflected Frankist themes in his obsession with sex, evidenced in his book, “Love and Responsibility”, which included diagrams on how to do it.

One of the most destructive errors spread by Frankists is Modern Biblical Criticism: the assertion that the true history of the bible can only be discovered by rationalistic analysis of the text without any reference to history or tradition.

The other destructive error spread by the Frankists is the Lodge of the Illuminati, which rules all the other Lodges and is the most cutthroat and brutal to achieve its goals. Macron and Draghi are known members.

The ultimate goal of Frankists in the Catholic Church is to get the Church to openly embrace as virtues those sins which cry out to God for vengeance: by this they hope to incite God to destroy the Church from the face of the earth.

And with Fiducia supplicans their project is proceeding forward at lightning speed.

It is clear then, that Pope Francis’ promotion of sexually deviant men, and ritual orgies at the Vatican, is not mere co-incidence or fringe activity. It’s a core goal of his project to turn the House of God into another Sodom and Gomorrah. It is also not a coincidence, that just 2 months before the publication of the Declaration from Hell, the World Jewish Congress was given a lobbying office at the Vatican by Pope Francis. The WJC is a Rothschild front, and the Rothschilds are the masters of the Lodge of the Illuminati.

Our Lady warned us solemnly at Akita, Japan, that God would send fire to the earth to destroy mankind if man did not stop sinning. She warned the Sacred Hierarchy principally for their responsibility to prevent this. She warned also of a war in the Church between Cardinals and Bishops.

We have now arrived.

Foot Note:

And the fact that none of the grifter collective wanted Pope Benedict XVI to have a successor shows just how much they merit the appellation, “Pope Francis’s Gay Opposition“. —  That is why I chuckle at the satanic hypocrisy of their trolls, who stop by now and then to criticize here at FromRome the work of restoring the Church. Since they do not actually believe in God, but want another Church of Port Royale (the Jansenist stronghold, where the righteous proved their superiority to everyone else by their strict adherence to religious ideology and practices), there is nothing which enrages them more than that the Catholic people of the world be united to Christ by being in communion with a legitimate Roman Pontiff. Because in that equation, there is no place for their ego: whereas, with an antipope, the grifting goes on with abandon.

More about Our Lady’s Warning at Akita, Japan …

News

VATICAN: Heretical Document stands, but its implementation is optional says Cardinal Fernandez

3 Comments

Editor’s Note: It is obvious in the way the Vatican is responding to the world-wide outrage at the document, Fiducia supplicans, that the persons in charge at the Vatican are pure politicians and do not have  drop of faith in the Living God, Whose Most Sacred Name they are willing to bandy about to advance the most perverse politics inside the Church. — If the document does not have to be implemented, then it is not binding on anyone. And if it is not binding on anyone it is not and never can be magisterial teaching. And if it is not magisterial teaching then the Roman Pontiff and the Roman Curia has no responsibility to publish such a blasphemous document.

This document cannot be left to stand. Those who signed it and those who agree with it in any way are apostates from the One Catholic Religion, wherein the bond of Marriage alone is capable of a blessing by a minister appointed by God. For whether the Bishop or Priest or Deacon blesses using the Divine Name or not, in the verbal expression employed, by the mere fact that he is a minister appointed sacramentally by Christ to represent Him, they invoke God’s Divine Name in approval.

Priests who want to give God’s approval to sexual abominations should be hung, and bishops who do this should be burnt alive. And any Catholic who has not these sentiments has no fear of the Living God or what He will do monstrous sinners such as these, Whom He shall surly damn to eternal torments in the pit of Hell, hanging them and burning them there in an eternal bonfire.

We need to preach these truths to all the clergy, so that they wake up fast. To remain silent about this controversy is to merit Hell, since every priest, deacon and Bishop has the duty to preach the unique truth of Marriage and to defend the Divine and Holy Name of Jesus from all profanation. To profane or even tolerate profanation of the Divine Name is to merit Hell, there can be no ifs and buts about it, since as all the Saints teach, to blasphemously take the Name of the Lord in vain is the worst sin meriting an infinite punishment, inasmuch as that Name is of Infinite Dignity and Majesty.

Knowing this, Cardinal Fernandez is attempting to convince Bishops to stop opposing it, so that they too can merit the inferno which he and Bergoglio have merited for its publication.

News

Wikipedia Editor PBritti Slashes out News about Fiducia Supplicans Opposition

3 Comments

Editor’s Note: No sooner than real opposition to Fiducia supplicans became news, that opposition’s statements were added to the Wikipedia article on the Document (see link above) on Dec. 20th. — Yet, 76 minutes later, Pbritti, a Wikipedia editor erased the entire section, in a pharisaical fit of ideological book burning.

PBritti describes himself as a history major from Colorado who appears to spends his time falsifying Catholic history on Wikipedia. But his bio on Wikipedia makes one think he is really a Gay Anglican faking to be a Catholic on wikipedia. — His reason for slashing out all the news about the opposition to the document was that the sources cited were not approved by him!

Wikipedia is currently in a financial crisis which risks its future. If the company had any honest intention of offering objective fact based information to the public, then they would have bounced editors like PBritti off the platform years ago and instantly. Contrariwise, Wikipedia is notorious for their gangs of Marxist operatives, who bounce off the platform anyone who would call PBritti out. For that reason, those critics of Wikipedia who think the platform should actually be banned for misinformation certainly have PBritti and friends to thank for proving them right, once again!

PBritti’s apparent objection to the entire section was that one reference cited an article at FromRome.Info, and that Wikipedia’s algo immediately identified that link as untrustworthy. — This is Wikipedia double-speak for “not funded by the CIA”.

Wikipedia is just another example of how Globalist Ideologues confront information: not about the reality which is or was, but about the reality they insist it was or be or should be. It is increasingly nothing more than a psychotic exercise in self will, which is probably why it has become the haunt of the unstable.

News

Fiducia supplicans has ripped the mask off Pope Francis’ Gay Opposition

12 Comments

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

After more than 10 years it is glaringly obvious that those influencers who do everything they can to get you to read their articles and watch their videos and attend their conferences, because they are criticizing Pope Francis, are totally insincere in their love for Holy Mother Church.

For how an anyone talk about a crisis for 10+ years and never once advocate for its solution?

Worse, how can these critics of Bergoglio honestly go on, day after day, proposing no other solution than than you read their articles, subscribe to their newsletters, donate to their appeals (to pay their own salaries)?

The Church is not a football game. And anyone wanting to make a living simply discussing Her destruction from within, is worse than sick.

These folk are what I called this summer, the “Gay Opposition” of Pope Francis: a name which irked not a few of them.

I used the term, as an anthropologist and in analogy. I am not saying that they are sodomites. But I am saying that just as sodomites comport themselves with the natural gifts God gave them, refusing to use them in the only natural way God wills that they be used, and using them in all the other illicit ways, all of which are fruitless, so the social media and journalistic influencers, nay, even the Cardinals and Bishops who have criticizes Bergoglio for 10+ years are using their gifts in all the wrong way, precisely because they NEVER advocate the solution to the problem which is the formal rebuke of the man and his deposition from the papacy for heresy, apostasy, and for being a freemason — a thing only the Church can do in a council.

But if you had any hope that this grifter collective (as they are also known generically) merits the name of “Gay opposition”, just count how many of them want Pope Francis deposed as a heretic for having signed Fiducia supplicans.

Can you count them on the fingers of one hand?

Whereas the voices of countless unheard of Catholics and even of non-Catholics are openly calling for the man to be burned at the stake.

Note the difference.

Even the B16 Sedevacantists are outraged after Fiducia supplicans’ publication that I have proposed Pope Francis be deposed in Council!

You see, one of the most effective psyops is the limited hangout. That is where the intelligence agent of your enemy agrees with you 98% in order to convince you to do nothing about fighting the enemy and to keep you taking information from him. It is psychologically deflating and it appeals to weak minds who want friendship more than truth and have no stomach for battle, precisely because they love no one but themselves. — This is the goal of the Gay Opposition.