“Is the Pope Catholic?” online Conference, Saturday Dec. 9, 2023

Editor’s Note: A conference by persons who insisted correctly that Benedict XVI was the true pope until death, while censoring others who said the same thing with better arguments, is being held in December, online, together with others who said that Pope Francis was the pope during his antipapacy and that the very same arguments of both where not worthy of public consideration.

A curious thing no doubt. — For Catholics publicly apologize before sitting down together. The only people who don’t are actors, politicians, and government agents & provocateurs, since they never really opposed one another’s positions.

I encourage you to consider signing up for the Conference, if only to test the waters as to whether its part of the Grifter collective (see footnote here) or true Opposition, because if they do not want to support the Sutri Initative, then you know the answer.

Because if they reject that initiative, then they truly must love Bergoglio more than the Church and hate the solution more than Bergoglio.

But since this conference was announced just a day after, I posed the Question of questions, I think you already might have your answer. This will be like the Catholic Identity Conference organized by Mr. Matt, which gagged Vigano for proposing a Catholic consideration, except this one is organized by Dr. Mazza and will exclude discussion of a Canonical solution.

How is this going to help the Church?

You might want to try to ask them another pertinent question: If you are going to publicly question Bergoglio’s catholicity and not be afraid of the canonical consequences, why not talk about removing him in a juridically valid manner? Otherwise, are you not like Archbishop Fernandez who wrote about about how to kiss men’s ears while omitting any discussion of natural God-given marriage?

Update on Br. Bugnolo

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

I still have not found any rental I could afford, or the offer of any place where, with my poor health, I could live in Europe. So I accepted the invitation of my relatives in the USA, and have returned for a time back to the States. I have not had the opportunity to celebrate Christmas with them for 5 years, on account of being locked down in Italy during the Scamdemic.

For this reason, I will not be publishing any personal appeals in the next few months, since I have no need. So I ask you all to stop sending me money!

However, you will see more appeals for Ordo Militaris Inc.’s humanitarian and security projects to defend persecuted Christians, as I devote my time to attempting to open a training camp in the USA. I encourage you to participate in supporting this effort, so that the Catholic world might soon have a place where young men can be trained to defend us all.

Meanwhile, I will not cease to advocate for the convocation of a Provincial Council at Rome, so if anyone of means wishes to contact me to assist me start a group to lobby the Bishops, please do so, via +1 406 299 9260 via voice or sms.

For both purposes I will be traveling as needed, in North America and Europe, as the opportunities present themselves in the next year. But as I see that defending the Church and saving the Roman Church are more important to me than having a place to call my own, I have decided to put aside that project for now.

I have put all my things in Italy into storage for 50 euro a month, and leave the project of having a hermitage in the hands of God, while I put my concerns for His Household first.

A big thanks to all who donated for my move. These funds are more than enough to cover my personal expenses during the next year. God bless and keep you all!

CREDITS: The photo of Br. Bugnolo visiting the Castle of Tolfa on Oct. 22, 2023, is copyright by FromRome.Info.

Rorate Caeli: Pope Francis has returned the Church to Medieval Levels of Corruption & Schism

Editor’s Note: Rorate Caeli is published by a political activist in Maryland, who is personally close to the views of American conservatism, which laments the push left, but never does anything to oppose it. This movement serves the masonic agenda of breaking down morals by shifting the meaning of terms. In this article, Rorate Caeli would have us believe that the corruption of the Church and Papacy in 1517 A. D., can be compared to that under Pope Francis. This tries to make Catholics think that what Pope Francis is doing was done by previous popes, and that the solution is another Reformation. Both are total lies.

Pope Francis personally approves canonical rehabilitation of Satanic Serial Abuser Rupnik

Editor’s Note: ‘Everyone is presumed innocent before the law, that is before judgment in a tribunal’ is a juridical principal regarding the tribunal process, but it does not mean that after being accused, and tried, that if one is appealing, one can obtain privileges, especially if one is a serial rapist or murderer.

Consider the cases where Bishops merely spoke out against heresies being promoted and were called on the carpet or removed.

But Father Rupnick who was expelled from the Jesuits after being accused of numerous cases of sexual abuse including making women drink his own bodily fluids from a consecrated chalice, certainly does not enjoy the reputation which merits being allowed to be incardinated into a Diocese in Slovenia and made a priest in good standing, and with the personal permission of Pope Francis!

What is really going on in the mind of this man is beyond belief, when you read of  his daily castigations of perfectly normal clerical behavior, in the very same days, he allows serial abusers off the hook of justice:

https://twitter.com/CatholicSat/status/1717230394787901782

This is an outrage. And it shows another reason by Bergoglio needs to be summed to a provincial Council, to be put on trial as to whether he shares the morals of the Catholic Church, without which one cannot hold any ecclesiastical office.

Why Archbishop Viganò is smarter than Michael Matt

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

French Translation

Earlier this month, Michael Matt, the editor of The Remnant and a descendant from what appears to be a Frankist Jew, on his mother’s side, who began the family’s tradition of printing Catholic news information, won international notoriety by squelching the video of Archbishop Viganò at the former’s Catholic Identity Conference, even though he has sold the conference on the promise of an exclusive interview with the famed Vatican monsignor.

FromRome.Info reported on that here.

The substance of the Archbishop’s talk, however, was lost in the news cycle, and therefore, because it is important and impinges on the canonical questions regarding the validity of the papacy of Jorge Mario Bergoglio, a.k.a. Pope Francis, I want to take it up in this essay.

The thesis of the Archbishop touches on the principal of acceptance of a canonical or juridically valid election.

And the Archbishop’s thesis is that a man who intends to destroy the Church or who has a heretical intention in wanting to be the Pope, cannot validly consent to accepting the office. He calls this the vitium consensus, or the vice in the act of consent.

Matt squelched the talk because he insists that those who participated in the conference did not want or deserve to have their reputations smeared with the accusation of sedevacantism.

But this argument of Michael Matt is absurd on the face of it. Sedevacantism is the ideology that there is no pope, no matter what the evidence is; but the argument of the Archbishop is a profound one, namely, that inasmuch as being the pope requires a man to receive the Mandate given St. Peter, it is impossible for a heretic to do this, since he has no relationship with Jesus Christ and thus no intention to do so, even if he says yes.

That “yes” then is a deception.

I have briefly commented on this before, saying, while the argument is a good one theologically or morally, it is canonically a difficult solution. This is because, being a baptised, confirmed Catholic, consecrated a Bishop and lawfully nominated as a Cardinal, in law he must be presumed to have consented validly to be the pope, when asked, and when responding, “Yes”.

As I pointed out in my satirical article about the Cardinal from Guadalajara, Spain, here, presumption has its limits. But presuming yes, when someone says yes, is clearly within the ordinary limits.

So from a juridical point of view, it is impossible to prove the case advanced by the Archbishop against Bergoglio. He could sufficiently remain silent and the presumption of the law would be that he validly consented.

But I think that the thesis of Viganò, however, is not to be lightly cast aside, because it does have its place where juridical right is determined by theological discernment. That is, where rights come into being and are extinguished by the authority Christ gave to the Church, under the guide of the Holy Spirit, to judge all things in the light of God.

And that place is a juridically valid Council of Bishops, whether universal or particular, that is, whether in a General Council of the whole Church, or in a Provincial Council of an ecclesiastical province.

Because there, what a man has done and said can be judged. And this judgement can regard whether these acts constitute heresy, apostasy or schism, whereupon if they be judge there to attain to this, the person who is presumed to consent, can be discerned in a juridically valid manner never to have consented and/or in a juridically valid manner to no longer so consent.

In the case of Jorge Mario Bergoglio, if it can be proven, for example, that he became a member of the Masonic Lodge before 1983 he fell under excommunication in the old Code of 1917 for that, and such a council could judge him to be invalidly nominated a Cardinal and invalidly elected and incapable of validly consenting to be the pope. Likewise if he joined after 1983, when the new Code of Canon Law, without this penalty, was approved, on the grounds that he was incapable of validly consenting inasmuch as he holds heretical views or is an apostate in virtue of the Masonic creed.

And that is why the thesis of the Archbishop must be considered in a Provincial Council of the kind proposed in the Sutri Initiative.

So the Archbishop is far smarter than Michael Matt. He is also more of a gentleman and cares more for the whole Church and the salvation of souls than others do of their own reputations.

Michael Matt is a graduate of Christendom College, an institution founded by 3 CIA agents. That Bergoglio was put into power by the CIA under the auspices of Hilary Clinton can be discerned when reading his homilies, which channel Barack Obama 99% on the same issues, such as globalism, immigration, poverty, discrimination, etc..

Barnhardt joins the Sedevacantist Sect

Editor’s Note: Back in 2016, Barnhardt who was fleeing the notoriety of having been adjudicated responsible for fraud and constructive fraud by an arbitration panel, which awarded her accuser 100,000 USD, burned a Koran and began her internet career as an influencer, since she could no longer work in security sales (futures, options, stocks, bonds trading).

At first she seemed to be a sincere Catholic, though she has always been sketchy about how she became a Catholic after cohabitating with a Catholic man (most likely an Italian citizen, in Tuscany) for nearly 10 years. I have not seen her baptismal  certificate, but I presume she has one.

But with the juridically valid election of Pope Benedict XVI’s successor, the mask she had been wearing for 7 years has fallen off; because whereas she has railed that the former Pope was still the holder of the munus, she never militated for a valid election of his successor. This is tantamount to wanting to have no pope over you, since Pope Benedict XVI never governed after his retirement.

Now, it is clear that Barnhardt is a sedevacantist and a preacher of schism with the Roman Pontiff, and this puts in doubt whether she ever converted to the Catholic Faith or was in communion with the Church. For all Catholics want to have a juridically valid pope to govern the Church.

But for Barnhardt, juridical facts and laws are gaslighting you. You must accept the reality she preaches; not the objective facts and laws of the matter. This is the psychosis promoted by the Sedevacantist sect.

Since the founding of the CIA, it has been an established modus operandi of that agency, to infiltrate the Catholic Church to change Her teachings and morals via the instrumentality of “converts”, who upon converting become influencers, but not 100% catholic ones. This phenomena is all the more evident in recent decades and especially since 2013, when a great number of “converts” and “reverts” appeared on the scene to insist that Bergoglio was the pope, while Benedict XVI was; and now, that Bergoglio is, to insist that he is not.

Mafia of St. Gallen Cardinal: The Pope can change the faith by changing the Catechism

Editor’s Note: The pro-gay Cardinal wants homosexuality mainstreamed, so he can engage in it without public shame. To accomplish this, he has coined a new Ultramontanism, that a Pope can change the Catholic Faith by editing the non-binding Catechism of the Catholic Church.

Since the time that Cathechism was published by John Paul II it contained errors. Pope Benedict XVI corrected it. Anti-Pope Francis inserted the heresy against capital punishment, because he and so many of his friends deserve to suffer it for their crimes of perversion, assisting and abetting child rapists, and for having laypeople dumped from planes from 30,000 ft in Argentina, by means of fingering them to the Military Junta.  The document is now, de facto, no more Catholic than something published by the New York Times.

But according to traditional Catholic Teaching, Catechisms were never magisterial teaching instruments, and what they contain in now way, for or against, determines Catholic Doctrine. This is true even of the Catechism of the Council of Trent or that of St. Pius X, which contain imprecisions or statements which the Apostolic See corrected later (in the former case, what regards the required matter of the ritual for the conferral of the Sacrament of Orders, in the latter, the nature of baptism a flaminis.)

But the Cardinal of Vienna is no fool. By attempting to convince Catholics that the locus of official teaching is a non-biding fallible book, called, The Catechism of the Catholic Church, he is aiming to get them to accept a system to control and deform their faith, which is not protected by the High Priestly Prayer of Christ. This statement by the Cardinal therefore implicitly recognizes the validity of the Assembly of January 30th past, because it implies that he now knows that Bergoglio is subject to some sort of restraining force.