Editor’s Note: Archbishop Fernandez has done the Church a favor by making it clear how deceptive, dishonest, heretical, erroneous, and malign Jorge Mario Bergoglio was during his anti-papacy. All these admissions will be evidence for his trial at the Provincial Council, which must be called within 60 days!
Doesn’t he have until the 21st of October to respond to the second Dubia? 60 days?
90 days is the cut off, not 60 days. Though clearly the Cardinals used 30 days as the limit before publishing their side. 90 days is such because if you do not respond in 90 days, it must be supposed that you have said NO, that you disagree with the affirmations in the Dubia.
It is impossible to conclude that Pope Francis was not promoting heresy during his antipapacy. Just his signing of the Abu Dabi document that said that “God wishes the plurality of religions” is enough to condemn him of heresy. Not to mention the many other things he said in the most ambiguous ways.
In hind sight many tried to make excuses for it, but in the light of his actions since July 11, now made known, its impossible.
Not to mention probably the worst thing he said – that the Virgin Mary was not born a saint (ie. Without original sin).
John. When did he stated that? And would that be against the Dogma of the Immaculate Conception?
He did say it, https://gloria.tv/post/D6erS2RsnKtS2UF2a6kNqioPV
However, since “Saint” has 4 senses, sanctified at baptism, in heaven, canonized, and perfect in grace, the statement is necessarily erroneous but not necessarily heretical. Still he must question in council about this one, ….