History

Did he do it?

21 Comments

Introduction by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

Here, in the video above, at OMC Radio TV, are presented so many forensic facts and motives, that lead any objective investigator to ponder the role of John Paul II in the disappearance and murder of Emmanuela Orlandi, and for very personal reasons. — If you have a weak faith, do NOT watch this show.

Here is a photo taken when Emmanuela Orlandi appears to be perhaps 12 years old, that would be, then about 4 years before her disappearance. But I will let experts tell me how old the girl in the pink sweater is (the one who is Emmanuela). Shown in this photo is the entire Orlandi Family meeting John Paul II, and it is more than a bit suggestive. The older man to the Pope’s left, is the Father of the Orlandi Family, a Vatican employee, proud to have his family presented to the Pope — the same father, who before his death declared: “My superior at the Vatican betrayed me”.

Next, there is this photo of an older Pietro Orlandi, Emmanuela’s crusading brother, meeting John Paul II, and take note of the facial expression. This photo is identified at Alamy as having been taken in 2013, which is impossible because John Paul II was already dead some 8 years before. In a CNN article the same photo is declared to be from before the disappearance of Emmanuela. But is that true? Look at the Face of the Pope.

And yet, Alamy and Corriere della Sera have removed from their database, the next photo, here below, which apparently shows another meeting with a slimmer Pietro Orlandi, and quite a more aggressive tone from John Paul II. — Why should such a photo be removed?

With Globalist Censorship growing daily, No one will ever know about the above article, if you do not share it.

21 thoughts on “Did he do it?”

  1. I don’t think I have a weak faith, so I watched it. But listening to it was literally nauseating.

    1. Reporting and Researching isn’t easy as well, learning these deep dark secrets to bring to the light, but one must do what one must do. Thanks for watching, please share.

    1. Well, you can be sure that it was not Jesus. Because the sins of men do not sully the Holiness of His Church. He would never permit that. — But if it was claimed that he said, “My once holy priests (bishops, cardinals, hierarchy etc.)”, then I would agree that it is probably authentic. Our Lady at la Salette was on point: the Clergy of France have become a sewer of iniquity.

      1. Not so. The Holy Roman Catholic Church ceased as a ‘Holy Church’ with the Advent of Pope John XXIII, and the ‘ecumenism’ of errors it fostered . Jesus Christ is The Church which is always Holy. However, the Holy Roman Catholic Church always refers to herself as The Church, and left The Church with the errors of Vatican II. In teaching errors of VII in the Name of Jesus Christ, she ceased to be ‘holy.’ If we only look at the desecration of Holy Eucharist, it is easy to see how Jesus would say ‘My once Holy Church.’ If it remained holy, then Jesus would not need to “make all things new” (Apoc 21:15), but He is making all things new.
        “He must reign, until He has put all His enemies under His feet” (1Co 15:25), especially all those who desecrate Him in Holy Eucharist.
        In my love and respect for you Brother Alexis, I still stand by the word of Jesus Christ when He said in private locution: “My once Holy Church.” It is truth.

      2. I respect you too Father, but I must demur and hold, on account of all the theology I have studied, that Christ could never say of His Bride, the Church, that she is not holy, because, as St. Paul teaches, He has washed Her in the laver of His own Blood to make Her His spotless Bride.

  3. Dear Br Bugnolo, it would be incredibly helpful if you could provide a clear explanation as to why it is important to be aware of all these matters (which, after reading Chesia Viva, don’t appear as shocking). Where do we draw the line between gossiping and making judgments or seeking justice? Personally, I find myself talking too much at times. Given the delicacy of this topic, I would like to understand when and how to discuss these matters and with whom. I am uncertain, and merely staying quiet might not be the best solution. I believe such guidance would be invaluable because the strong emotions provoked by these revelations may lead us to sin.

    1. The topic of the above report is something which you should not exaggerate or be ashamed to discuss, but good manner do not bring up topics like this without being asked. Yes, we should take care not to scandalize others even with the truth, but if anyone says that JP2 was clearly a saint, I would say, “Well, there is the case of Emmanuela Orlandi, and I do not think JP2 acted like a saint there …”.

  5. The brother Pietro has tirelessly
    seeking the truth and has been looking at the Vatican as responsible…and continues to this day. Why did Pope Benedict XVI not reopen this investigation and seek to assist further on the truth?

    1. Some serial killers are very effective burying bodies, but in Italy nothing goes without notice, as Italians are very visually sensitive. And so it is nearly forensically certain that the uncle was last seen with her, but that determines nothing about the motive or what happened to her. If he knew intelligence agents he was most likely one himself, and thus if the disapperance of Emmanuela was of national security to protect their interests in some manner, they could easily both murder her and do away with the body in a way it could never be found. But as I said in the program, its a bad idea to make the body never be found, because that way the investigation never ends, and it would have been much more easy to bury her on the property of some mafioso. So the question remains, why was it so important to make the body disappear. And I think the answer is obvious from the photographs I share above.

  7. Dear Bro. Alexis, I have to mention I was not happy with Pope JPII…on the other hand I was thrilled with Joseph Card. Ratzinger when selected as Pope to the point of tears!
    Upon learning so much on the Vatican it seems all these Popes, even Pope Pius XII, were complicit in corruption within and all I can say is Holy Mother Church is going through Her Crucible…and as Our Lady of LaSalette allegedly stated Rome will lose the faith…
    Mother Mary, pray for us!

  8. The girl in the pink sweater is not Emmanuela, she is the one in the glasses next to the pink sweater girl. In doing research over the years, Pietro, her brother, showed this picture and how Emmanuela was embarassed in it because of her big glasses. It was a 51 or 59 video on Emmanuela narrated by her brother.

  9. Here is the link of Pietro Orlandi in the Kidnapping of Emanuella Orlandi that I said yesterday I would send you. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-9PaxLc4BU
    At the 2:53 mark, you can see the picture (corresponding to the first picture you posted under the podcast), where Pietro identifies his sister as the one in the glasses – which looks like her at 15. At the 23:11 mark is the picture (corresponding to the 2nd picture you posted under the podcast), of Pietro Orlandi and JPII – it was Christmas Eve 6 months after Emanuela’s disappearance and JPII went to comfort the family and offered Pietro a job at the Vatican Bank.

    1. Thank you for this link, but YouTube is blocking that video in Italy. But was not Emmanuela the youngest in the family? Who is the other girl?

  10. I don’t believe John Paul 2 would be capable of that crime.He may have had information regarding the kidnapping he was not at liberty to divulge to the girl’s parents. It was also said John Paul heard confessions in Roman churches anonymously .

    1. nevertheless, he diverted the investigation and obstructed the investigation. Therefore he is very guilty, even if he was not directly involved.

Comments are closed.