by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

One of the greatest and yet most unknown Saints of the 19th Century was Anthony Marie Claret y Claret, a Catholic priest and religious, founder of the Claretians, who was made a Bishop, was confessor to the Queen of Spain, and attended Vatican I.

So great was his piety, that when certain Bishops at Vatican I suggested that the Pope was not protected by the grace of infallibility, he had a heart attack.

So great was his friendship with Our Lord, that when he received the Eucharist, daily, the Host would not disintegrate, until the next time he received.

So great was his proximity to the Holy Spirit, in spirit, that his body would glow in the dark.

So great was the protection offered him by the Eternal Father, that on occasion, when in rained, it did not rain upon him!

So much did God want us to follow his teaching, that when he was pastor of a small village, he raised more than a dozen parishioners from the dead!

So we can be sure that these rules for married couples are approved of in Heaven. They are contained in the Spanish edition of his book, entitled, “Camino recto y seguro para llegar al cielo”, that is, “The Right and Safe Path to arrive at Heaven”.

First, the images of the book cover and page, and then, my English translation of the rules for a holy and blessed Married Life: 10 for husbands, and 10 for wives.

10 RULES FOR HUSBANDS

1. To love your wife as Jesus Christ loves the Church.

2. To not despise her, since she is your inseparable companion.

3. To lead her as your inferior.

4. To care for her, as the guard of your own person.

5. Maintain her in a decent manner.

6. Endure her with patience.

7. Assist her in charity.

8. Correct her with benevolence.

9. Do not mistreat her in word or deed.

10. Never do or say anything in front of your children, even the little ones, which could be a source of scandal.

10 RULES FOR WIVES

1. Appreciate your husband.

2. Respect him as your head.

3. Obey him as your superior.

4. Assist him with all diligence.

5. Care for him with reverence.

6. Correct him with meekness.

7. Shut up when you are enraged and while you are angry.

8. Endure his defects with patience.

9. Flee from treating him as an equal.

10. Cooperate with your husband in the education of your children.

Commentary and Critique by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

Click image above for the news article

This is a story I have been personally following for neigh 30 years. And the news today, is not something to be welcomed acritically, because one has to ask, after nearly all the Churches embraced the Scamdemic with a religious fervor greater than any shown Jesus Christ since the Dogmatic definition of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin, why now?

Why now? may be explained by the last major proposal in this area, which was to set the First Sunday of April as Easter, jettisoning both the Orthodox and the Catholic traditions in this regard.

For the Orthodox follow the Julian Calendar and the Catholics the Gregorian, but both calculate Easter in the same manner, as the First Sunday after the first Saturday after the first Full Moon, which rises after the Vernal Equinox, when the equator of the Earth is tilted neither away from nor towards the Sun. This calculation is to ensure that Easter is always celebrated after the Passover, since Our Lord rose from the Dead on the day after Passover, in the year 33 A. D. [As regards the year, I adhere to the most recent astronomical determinations of this date, as I explain below].

(This moment in time each year occurs at a different hour of the day at different places on the Earth, and thus, I am not sure how the Churches account for this difference, whether they use the time of the Equinox for Jerusalem, Constantinople or Rome. — If any reader knows, comment below).

But since the Gregorian calendar reckons for the inaccuracies of the calendar reformed by Julius Caesar, the Catholics at present reckon each day of the year 13 days before the Orthodox. So that the Orthodox Feasts are generally held 13 days after the Catholic.  And thus, in some years the Orthodox Celebrate Easter on the same date as us, but in others as much as a month later.

However, the method of calculation, is the same, and it comes from the Apostles themselves, according to tradition.

To set Easter as the First Sunday in April, regardless of the Equinox or the Moon, however, would be to break entirely with that tradition.

And this is a serious matter, because calendrical  calculations are important to the Living God, as can be seen in the Books of Moses, where God ordains certain feasts to be kept on certain days, determined by the position of the Sun and Moon.

Indeed, the Doctors of the Church all declare that the cycles of the Sun and Moon, as seen in the sky above the Earth, are the Calendar which God has given man for the reckoning of time. To jettison that reckoning and establish something as an agreement among men, which excludes the God-give manner of calculating Easter (based on the calculation of the Passover), is to jettison God’s authority over time and the ritual of the Redemption.

And that would fit perfectly in the Masonic project of making Man the center of all authority.  But it would also put the Churches which adhere to such a anthropocentric method of calculation IN SCHISM FROM THE LIVING GOD.

Nor can anyone reasonable hold that the Church or the Pope has the authority to abandon Tradition on this point or to invent an entirely new calculation which has nothing to do with the date of the Passover, as God has decreed in the Old Testament.

This would violate the teaching of Vatican I, which infallibly taught that the entire Church, including the Pope, is bound by Scripture and Tradition.

But it also ominous to propose such a change to the First Sunday of April, because Our Lord instituted the New Covenant precisely when He did, because of the apostasy of the High Priests and Scribes of His own day, who CHANGED the date of the Passover without divine authorization. I have written about this before at Easter in 2020 A. D..

For as we now know, the discrepancy of the Gospels regarding the Passion of Our Lord was due to the variation in the observation of the rising of the Moon, on Passover, in 33 A. D.

For the Gospels say that Jesus celebrated the Passover with His disciples on Thursday Evening, but that He was crucified for the salvation of the world, on Friday, before the beginning of the celebration of the Passover.

To the casual observer this seems at odds with the declaration made by the Lord, that no one could accuse Him of violating the Mosaic Law.

The explanation is found in the precise astronomical calculation for the rising of the Moon in 33 A. D., when in that year alone, it was seen to rise at Jerusalem about 1 minute after sunset on Thursday, April 2, 33 A. D., but as seen from Alexandria, which was the cultural center of the Jewish diaspora and the center of astronomical science in the First Century A. D. (similar to Greenwich, England, today), it was seen to rise about one minute BEFORE sunset on that day, pushing the calculation to Friday, as the vigil of Passover.

So the Jews of that year at Alexandria were to celebrate Passover in Egypt on Saturday, but those in Jerusalem who followed the Mosaic Law on Friday.

This precise astronomical calculation, made by a chronologist at the Naval Observatory in Maryland Virginia, at my personal request, many years ago, shows that Our Lord considered the Moon rise as seen from Jerusalem, but that the High Priest, to make more money at the feast, moved the celebration to Saturday, to accommodate the Jews from Egypt.

But such a move of the Feast was NOT within their authority, and in fact broke the Old Covenant with an act of horrible apostasy.

And this is why Our Lord chose to inaugurate in His own Flesh and Blood the New Covenant on Thursday night, the beginning of the true Passover according to the Mosaic Law, and the true Passover according to Christian law.

Thus, if any Churches would break from the calculation of Passover to celebrate Easter, they would fall into a most grave violation of the Divine foundational act of the New Covenant. And that would be apostasy of biblical proportions.

Thus, my concern is, that this new development for the determination of a common date of Easter is being promoted or will be perverted by Globalist interests, who aim above all to turn the House of the Living God into an Temple of the Abomination of Desolation.

For truly, to abandon Easter, is an Abomination of Desolation.

Father Paul Francis, a frequent commentator here at FromRome.info has passed away. FromRome.Info learned of this through a reader who received a letter from the US Post Office back, stamped “Deceased”.

FromRome.Info asks you to pray for this courageous humble priest who stood with Pope Benedict XVI in the last years of his life, and was an ardent supporter of our Electronic News Journal.

If anyone knows more about this priest, please comment below.

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

On Oct. 20, 2010, Pope Benedict XVI during his Wednesday Audience spoke about the trials suffered by Saint Elizabeth of Hungary, who was the wive of the Landgrave of Thuringia, and should have inherited his rule, was cast aside by a cousin, who usurped the throne of the Landgravate.

Here is what he said on that occasion, from the official English translation of his original discourse in Italian, from the Vatican website:

However, another trial was lying in wait for Elizabeth. Her brother-in-law usurped the government of Thuringia, declaring himself to be the true heir of Ludwig and accusing Elizabeth of being a pious woman incapable of ruling. The young widow, with three children, was banished from the Castle of Wartburg and went in search of a place of refuge. Only two of her ladies remained close to her. They accompanied her and entrusted the three children to the care of Ludwig’s friends. Wandering through the villages, Elizabeth worked wherever she was welcomed, looked after the sick, spun thread and cooked.

During this calvary which she bore with great faith, with patience and with dedication to God, a few relatives who had stayed faithful to her and viewed her brother-in-law’s rule as illegal, restored her reputation.

The parallels with what happened to him in 2013 and has suffered since then are unmistakable.

I wish to thank the author of @MiScrivoaReligione on Youtube for this most excellent find!

UPDATE

Thanks to a persisted Priest in Portugal, I want to call everyone’s attention to the date on which this discourse was given. 10.20, 2010 A. D., which when written backward is 10.20 1020 A. D. — October 10, 1020 A. D..

That was when Pope Benedict VIII reigned.

And that is significant, because that is the very pope whom Pope Benedict XVI will allude to, with his cryptic message to his biographer, Peter Seewald, in 2016, when he says, no pope has resigned in a 1000 years (1017-2016), and even in the first millenium (of the Church 33 AD to 1032 A. D.) it was an exception!

And so, it is entirely possible that this discourse on St. Elizabeth WAS A SIGN TO THE WORLD OF WHAT HE WAS ABOUT TO DO, to defend against THE FREEMASONS IN THE CHURCH, and that he had contemplated this from as early as October 2010 A. D.!

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

Yesterday, the G20 resolved to crack down on misinformation on the internet. And this morning, Rome time, at 7:15 A.M., all internet and cellphone traffic attempting to reach FromRome.Info from Italian territory was banned.

FromRome.Info is now unable to be accessed inside the territory of the Italian Republic from Italian carriers.

It remains reachable only through foreign SIM Cards inserted into cellphones. This ban effected the IP of FromRome.Info, not other sites on the internet. And this while Whatsapp communications and Twitter access were still accessible.

FromRome.Info, asks readers if they are in Italy to attempt to reach the site through VIPs. If anyone in Italy can reach this site on an Italian landline or SIM Card please comment below.

The report about Gānswein, which was just published, seems to be the one which has triggered the ban, though it could have been the published exposé of NATO misinformation or CIA yesterday.

Fortunately, I am way ahead of the enemies of truth and have multiple accesses to the Internet outside of the control of EU authorities.

If you wish to help FromRome.info stay on line, please consider helping, because a whole new level of electronic warfare is being directed against it.

UPDATE: We will shame the corporations which are participating in this ban by naming them here, as information is provided to us from readers:

TIM – Via SIM cards [Since 7:15 AM today, shammed them publicly at 9:07; restored access at 9:22 AM]

VODAPHONE –  Via SIM cards  [Ban before 8:45 AM; Ban lifted approx. 15 minutes after shaming them publicly at 9:07 AM]

WIND – On land lines [Ban effective before 9:22 AM]

Commentary By Br. Alexis Bugnolo

The tweet from the above account just shed tremendous light on the recent controversy. This account is widely believed to be under the control of someone close to the Archbishop. The wording of the tweet, therefore, should be seen as highly significant.

According to this tweet, the forger of the letter was attempting to make Archbishop Gänswein appear to betray Pope Benedict XVI’s trust (“with regard to the emeritus”).

But the word used to signify Pope Benedict, “the emeritus” is very carefully chosen. It is NOT capitalized. Therefore, it is being used with the Latin signification, as “the one who merits to be called” the Pope. Also, by using the words, “complete rejection”, it is affirming the negation of all the allegations made in the Letter.

This tweet, therefore, is in perfect Ratzinger Code, and clarifies that the affirmations contained in the forged letter are all contrary to that trust.

Therefore, reviewing the Letter once again:

we can now say, affirmatively, that according to the author of this tweet, and presumably, according to the Archbishop himself:

1. The Holy Father is glad that there are priests who celebrate Mass, “In communion with Pope Benedict”.
2. The Holy Father always celebrates as Pope, naming his sacred person in the canon with, “your unworthy servant”.
3. The Holy Father has never promised Bergoglio personally “devout and unconditional obedience”.
4.  Don Minutella has suffered a grievous violation of his rights as a priest by 2 unjust sentences which have no legal effect, because the Holy Father was never consulted.
5. The Holy Father assures Don Minutella of his continued prayers as he crusades for his restoration.

For more information on this story, see our reports and coverage, here.

UPDATE: I have been informed, that this tweet appears to be responding to a discussion the other day between Don Minutella and Andrea Cionci over the affirmations in the Letter, and this is another confirmation, that I have read the Ratzinger Code here correctly. But it would also be another piece of evidence, that this twitter account is run by the Archbishop himself or one of his relatives, such as a brother. Indeed, to me, the phraseology in the Letter appears to reflect a native German speaker.

This program is a follow up to FromRome.Info’s report on the CIA Document detailing the Plan to destroy the Catholic Church, here.