Editor’s Note: Once you allow the nominalistic error (that words only have the meaning given to them by the speaker), to be the basis of law and right, anything is possible.
Comments are closed.
| Cookie | Duration | Description |
|---|---|---|
| cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
| cookielawinfo-checbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
| cookielawinfo-checbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
| viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |
A Dude wearing tights and a dress in a wheelchair pretending paralysis?
How much is the Govt. paying him for his MENTAL DISABILITY.
Used to be…Not that long ago, this would be considered ‘DELUSIONAL THINKING’. Isn’t Biblical…😝🤢🤮
Thank you for giving those of us who didn’t study philosophy the term “nominalistic error” to label this type of lying.
Along with the nifty adjective “solipsistic,” It will come in useful in conversations trying to reason with unreasonable people.