Editor’s Note: There has been a 40 year war between Eritrea and Ethiopia. Both governments now are Marxist, and the war continues as a cover for the persecution of Catholics in Eritrea and Orthodox Christians in Ethiopia, while both sides push the Muslims to depopulate both countries and demographically replace both groups with themselves. At the same time they buy a lot of arms from China, Saudi Arabia, and France. This is what you call Masonic colonial warfare.
Editor’s Note: Love has triumphed! The true love which perverts have not known and which they reject. Love is not about narcissistic predation, exploitation, manipulation, abuse, rape, or weaponized sex. Love is about a mutual exchange of life giving affection which is willed by the Creator, who empowers it, to bring new human persons into existence. Love does not seek to conquer or dominate, but to serve. Yet it is not about self degredation, abasement, or slavery. Perverts cannot know love, because everything it is not, is what they seek and in the darkness they call light, true love does not exist! God bless these youth and their adult leaders. Let more Christian organizations with the same moral integrity arise. In their light, there is hope for a new generation.
by Br. Alexis Bugnolo
Reflecting on the events of the last 3 years, I begin with this article a series of reflections on the Great Reset: the Armageddon which has begun against humanity by the adherents of Lucifer.
And the first thing we need to recognize, to understand how imminent this danger is to each of us, is that, the very architecture of law, society, economics, propaganda, psychology and fake religion is the very cage in which they will enslave us.
Yes, we are already caged animals.
And we prefer our peanut delivery system, to true freedom in the wild.
I use this metaphor to shock you to the consideration of this stunning fact: that other than talk, we have done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to decrease the power of or break free from the Globalist Agenda 2030 which is heading out way like a speeding train.
And the Globalists know this. They are chuckling to themselves as they see all the loud mouths against the Scamdemic buckle under and accept such high energy costs, that these alone will enable the future they are planning: owning nothing, and being happy. Happy that you have a crumb-job of a slave in your own home town, because you ca no longer travel out of town. You will say in 10 years, better a slave, than to starve to death.
When up to 90% of energy prices is simply imposed taxes, and no one, but myself is calling that out — namely, that any politician can simply call for removing the taxes during the present energy crisis, but none does — and no anti-globalist organization are even suggesting such a thing…. when all this is happening, it is pretty darn clear that there is NO opposition to globalism. The talking heads during the Scamdemic who whined from one day to another about censorship are totally oblivious to what is going on. The fools believe that the Scamdemic was the whole thing. They are obsessedly focused now on the DeathVaxx consequences and don’t even care to take notice of how the gates of eternal enslavement are closing on them.
The inability to recognize that you are in a prison might be attributed to total ignorance or stupidity, depending on whether it is based on a lack of information or unawareness.
But knowing that your enemy has set a date for your slavery, and watching the fencing become every tighter round you, that is folly and insanity.
So globalism marches on, because we are already in a cage, and 99.99% of those complaining about it are quite content to remain there.
You can’t make this up….
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGq7A8t69ls
by Br. Alexis Bugnolo
Lately I have written a series of articles, which begin with the words, “On true Devotion” (if you use the search engine here on FromRome.Info you can find them under this rubric).
But this article is somewhat different, because the object of the devotion is not a Saint, but the Roman Pontiff. So a better title would be, “On True Loyalty to the Roman Pontiff, Benedict XVI.”
I am writing this article because while the battle is fiercest in the defense of the Church when one enters the fray under the banner of Pope Benedict XVI and for his restoration, Satan leaves no stone un-turned to conjure the worse of temptations to take down these most stalwart defenders of the Kingdom of Christ who are routing him on his most undefended flank.
And one such temptation is sectarianism.
You see. When all is written and accomplished, that we have defended Pope Benedict XVI’s rightful claim to the Apostolic Throne, what we have done is no great work of learning or virtue. We are simply putting to use our personal habits of critical thinking and independent thought, and curiosity, which in themselves are neither morally good or evil, but which incline us to be more disagreeable than the average man.
And this is our weakness.
Because in controversies so intense, it is easy to fall into thinking that since we are among very few on the right side of the front, that we are some how something special.
But the truth is not anything like that.
We must fight under the banner of the Holy Father because that is our duty. And it is nothing more than our duty, so we cannot claim at victory’s end to have some special reward.
And we must battle on with pure motives, not to gain anything or prove anything about how important we are. Because we are not.
Canon 1364 imposes ipso facto excommunication upon all who refuse communion with the Roman Pontiff, since they are schismatics. And this applies to those who willingly and intentionally refuse to recognize the probity of his claim, though they cloak their refusal in a thousand excuses and total intellectual sloth.
But excommunication also is leveled against all who refuse communion with those in communion with the Pope. That too is the sin of schism:
See canon 751:
… Schisma, subiectionis Summo Pontifici aut communionis cum Ecclesiae membris eidem subditis detrectatio.
which in English is:
… Schism, the withdrawl from subjection to the Roman Pontiff or from communion with those members of the Church subject to Him.
And there is the rub.
Since, many voices are claiming that if you do not pledge obedience to certain pro-Benedict clergy, you are somehow not a member of the Catholic Church.
This is sheer lunacy.
The only touchstone for unity in the Church is the man who holds the petrine munus.
The visible Church is full of those who claim falsely that that man is Bergoglio. They will even resort to excommunication or threat of excommunication to insist on their unfounded and totally false opinion.
But the last thing the Church needs is another Bergoglio, that is, another man claiming to hold the petrine munus and demanding that every Catholic hold communion with him TO THE EXCLUSION of communion with other Catholics who recognize that Pope Benedict XVI is the true Pope.
This grave error has been brewing some time both in the USA and in Europe. And that is why I have consistently from my first day in Italy to this day never claimed to be a member of any group or a supporter of any exclusive claim to Catholicity among anyone supporting pope Benedict.
This is in part why I have been consistently ignored and attacked by those who supported Pope Benedict XVI before and after me. I take it as a wreath of laurel, because I intend to practice true devotion to Pope Benedict XVI.
I have also publicly reproved the now commonly spread grave error in Sacramental theology, which claims that a Mass offered by a validly ordained priest according to the ritual approved by the Church but in communion with an Antipope is invalid.
This opinion is wrong, because a Mass is not measured valid or invalid. The word valid is applied to the confection of a Sacrament. If all that is necessary for the Sacrament to exist, to come into being, has been done by the proper minister, then the confection is called valid. If not, its invalid.
If the confection was done by someone with the power to do it, but without the authority to do it, its call ilicit. If with the authority, conferred by decree or via the principle of Chiesa suppleat, then it is called licit.
If the Mass has a valid consecration, and is celebrated in a public oratory, then it legitimately satisfies your Sunday obligation. If not, then it does not. No mass televised on TV or the internet satisfies your Sunday obligation. Your Sunday obligation is only satisfied by a real mass in communion with the true Pope. There is no obligation to travel more than 1 hour to find such a mass, for when there is none, you have no obligation.
And you can obtain all the graces of weekly communion by simply asking them from the Lord Jesus, if you ask sincerely, devoutly and humbly. So there is no spiritual necessity to do anything else to fulfill your sunday obligation or receive the Sacrament. If you want to make a sacrifice to do this, visit a priest in communion with the true Pope and attend his private or public mass, even if this costs you time and money and much inconvenience. Because Jesus is worth it.
Moreover, a valid mass said in communion with the true Pope is supernaturally efficacious as a propitiatory sacrifice, since it partakes of the Redeeming Sacrifice of Christ upon the Cross. If said in communion with an antipope, it is not efficacious.
These things are true regardless of the personal knowledge of the one who offers the Mass or those attending it. Thus even if you have no idea that Benedict XVI is still the pope, and you attend mass in communion with the Antipope, that mass will not propitiate your sins, does not satisfy your Sunday obligation in the sight of God, and thus God must refuse you all or most of the grace of attending it, even though Jesus does in fact become present on the Altar through a valid consecration.
That is totally incorrect sacramental theology. And this is not an open question. What I have stated here is the accepted opinion of all Catholic theologians for 800 years.
Anyone claiming to have a inspiration which goes contrary to that is deceived by his own pride or by a devil.
And since the proper sacramental theology is part of the Sacred and Apostolic Tradition of the Church, anyone claiming an innovation or novelty in these matters is simply wrong and certainly in error. Pope Benedict XVI talked about this controversy, which first arose after the persecutions of Decian in North Africa, back in 2006 (here)
The Church has not yet dogmatically defined all the aspects which I just reiterated, so we cannot say that those who espouse such errors are formal, canonically heretics. But I do believe that it is heresy before God to claim a different doctrine. And that it should be punished in a future council.
Finally, a note on spiritual enslavement. It is a grave vice to use one’s pastoral authority to bind the faithful in spiritual obedience to one’s self. This has always been prohibited by the Church. And no amount of fidelity to Pope Benedict XVI or to any Saint or to Jesus Christ gives anyone the authority to practice spiritual enslavement.
It is consequently also a grave violation of the privacy of your personal spiritual life, that anyone short of the Pope or your bishop, for canonical reasons well proven, ask you to identify your confessor or spiritual director or demand that you take one or worse yet, suggest a specific priest to you as one of these. Fly from such sectarians!
So if anyone tells you to stop thinking, or demands that you join in union with the pastoral approach of anyone, to the exclusion of other Catholics, or sets up any rule as a rule of faith other than what we have received from Christ, the Apostles and the Church, even if he work wonders in the heavens or earth, regard him as a false preacher, and follow him not.
NOTE WELL: I have disabled comments on this post to prevent anyone using what I have said against anyone in particular. I do allow faithful translations, and for permission, please ask me via my Contact page.
Editor’s Note: I would repeat, for the upteenth time, that this one is for those who say, where are all the dead. But as these commentators seem to have gone silent, the truth may have caught up to them already. Sad to say.
SUMMARY: My Superiors admit that Bergoglio is a bad pope and that they cannot refute canonically that Benedict XVI is still the pope.
With the most absolute indifference of the mainstream Vaticanista, the most sensational story of the Church since the times of the Western Schism is unfolding. Priest-heroes continue to come forth and declare their fidelity to the true Pope, Benedict XVI, who, as you know very well by now, has never abdicated, but, forced to get out of the way, withdrew in an impeded see, (canon 412) — a canonical situation of imprisonment — that allows him to remain the only pope as he has been talking about for nine years without ever being able to specify which of the two. Clearly, if we go to an upcoming conclave with the approximately 120 false cardinals appointed by Bergoglio, another anti-pope will be elected, and goodbye forever visible canonical Church. She will go back to the catacombs.
The impeded see is nothing abstruse or quirky: it has existed since the pontifical “decretals”, that is, since 1200, and canon 335 explicitly identifies it as an alternative to a vacant see: “While the Roman see is vacant or TOTALLY IMPEDED, nothing is to be changed in the governance of the universal Church ”.
Therefore, if the pope renounces the Petrine munus, he abdicates and the see is vacant. If the pope cannot exercise the ministerium, practical power – as per the Declaratio of Pope Benedict – the see is prevented, he remains pope, imprisoned. Ergo, anyone who exercises papal power in his place is a usurper antipope. We have been affirming this for two years, here, twice a week, now also in the bestseller “Codice Ratzinger” (Byoblu ed. May 2022) and no one has been able to deny us, not even the publicly questioned canonists who, in Bologna, in response, after the discovery of the juridical situation, they set up a study group “on the pope emeritus and the impeded pope”. (“Emeritus” does not mean retired, but the one who deserves, who has the right to be pope).
The first priest (in Italy) to have chosen to follow Christ and his Vicar was Don Alessandro Minutella, a priest from Palermo with two doctorates in dogmatic theology who immediately understood that Bergoglio certainly could not be the pope, with his inverted and antichristic spirituality: Bergogliism. Don Minutella paid dearly for his fidelity to the true pontiff: a suspension a divinis, two excommunications, a reduction to the lay state. Obviously all invalid, as the sanctions were imposed by the anti-papal church. After him, Don Enrico Bernasconi, also invalidly excommunicated, and with pride. Then Friar Celestino, Father Gebhardt (German), Father Johannes (Austrian), Father Pavel (Czech) and Father Natale were joined them. There are several nuns, which we will discuss in his time.
Today we offer you some lines summarized by a full-bodied interview by Samuel Colombo (original Here) with Fr Robert Benko, 52-year-old “ex” Salesian from Slovakia, ordained in 2002, who has made important statements.
C: Father, what made you say in conscience that the Pope is and still remains Benedict XVI?
B. “From the first moment I knew that Benedict XVI is the real Pope. When he resigned I, not understanding Latin, did not know what was happening, but in my heart I felt that something was wrong .. However, I could not give myself a answer at that time because I had no material. The first thing I heard after Bergoglio’s election, which our diocesan priests in Šaštín (but not only) told us, was that the election was invalid because the rules had not been respected “.
C: And why didn’t these priests declare themselves?
B. “At that time, when I heard that it was invalid, I wanted to declare myself immediately, but they told me:“ If you declare yourself, what will you do by yourself? Alone you do nothing. So you can at least do something for the people who are left. You must not fear that in the Vatican they allow us to do things against our faith “, so I preferred to remain silent, because I did not have much information”.
C: Perhaps the right time had to come .. And in the course of all these years you would surely have seen the nefarious work of the so-called Pope Francis …
B. “Yes, that’s right. When I was in the last city, Michalovce, I heard about these “Dubia” that the cardinals wrote … Then other priests and other people joined them, but the question was not resolved. So I started looking and, over time (4 or 5 years ago), I found Don Minutella and I started listening to him. He was the first priest who helped me with the Code of Canon Law because when you work with children or young people there is not much time to deepen things, instead Don Minutella has studied a lot. I felt this was the truth. He burned in my heart. But I didn’t know how to get out. I have had meetings with superiors for 14 months. Two years ago, Don Bernasconi helped me because he sent me an email with some material that I can use to write to my superiors and explain the problem. I asked so many questions asking for an answer. They studied my questions and replied: « We don’t know how to answer you, but we are with Pope Francis. There have been many bad popes in history, we know that he is not good but we are with him » “.
C: But the problem is not that Bergoglio is a bad Pope. Bergoglio is not the Pope and they are with someone who is not the Pope!
B. “Yes, this is very clear. Because here we are not dealing with a sin of a superior, a bishop or a Pope, or an error .. it is a question of someone who is not a Pope! ”.
C: It may be a foregone conclusion given that “Ubi Petrus Ibi Ecclesia”, but in union with whom do you celebrate Mass, Father Robert?
B. “Before leaving, I was already celebrating mass with Pope Benedict because the churches were closed during the pandemic. So when I celebrated Holy Mass alone, I celebrated it in union with Pope Benedict. But when I had to celebrate in the community they forced me to name Pope Francis. This was the problem. This is why I did not obey. And I didn’t want to join the other communities during those 14 months. My superior told me: “Now I know that you are with Pope Benedict, but I cannot let you go leave immediately, you have to disobey over and over again, so that I may have the material for the superior to let you go”. It is not easy to leave the Salesian community. But if they have material of disobedience… once, twice, three times… ”.
C: But these Salesian priests, your superiors, who sanctioned it and made sure you left, how do they think?
B. “They had pain in their hearts, they were sad, they didn’t want me to go out. Because they knew something was wrong, they couldn’t answer me. It is a serious thing to say “we do not know how to answer you”: then what are we talking about if you do not know how to answer me? From December 2021 I am no longer among the Salesians, but I was very happy, even if my confreres were sad because they loved me. In my heart I am and will always be a Salesian ”.
C: Are there other priests in Slovakia who may not have come out yet but who recognize Pope Benedict XVI as?
B. “Yes, there are, both diocesan and Salesian, but they live in hiding because they are afraid of losing their jobs. Even teachers in schools understand that this is not the teaching of the Church, but they must continue because without money they cannot support the family “.
C: So they are kept, let’s say, under blackmail … Is there any bishop in Slovakia that you recognize as Pope Benedict XVI?
B. “Yes, but I can’t reveal his name”.
C: Considering the fact that Bergoglio has created a new false church, as prophesied by Padre Pio in a dialogue with Father Amorth, in your opinion are the masses celebrated in union with the so-called Pope Francis to be considered valid?
B. “No, absolutely not. The Holy Spirit is the spirit of truth. When the sacraments are received in union with the true head of the Church, then the Holy Spirit descends ”. (Card. Ratzinger also said that “without communion with the pope there is no communion with Christ”).
C: You have been suspended a divinis, but you have not been excommunicated yet …
B. “No .. but now I have learned that in Trnava it is said that the archbishop of Bratislava Stanislav Zvolenský wants to excommunicate me because he has heard that we are growing and we are increasing”.
C: Let’s say that the so-called Pope Francis is the spiritual leader of the New World Order. Do you agree with this statement?
B. “Yes, that’s clear”.
C: And are we living, in your opinion, the Third Secret of Fatima and that deception mentioned in the Catechism of the Catholic Church in 675?
B. “Yes, exactly”.
+ + +
In all this, Pope Benedict does not speak, he cannot, given that he is in an impeded see, and he does not deny these priests, nor anyone who speaks of an impeded see, much less the preset writer. Indeed, in a letter a few days ago to the Gioacchino da Fiore Studio Center, He wrote: “In the historical action of God, the truth is gradually revealed”.
And whoever has ears to hear, let him hear it!
by Br. Alexis Bugnolo
The sense of hopelessness arises in a mind which does not know the solution, or which lacks the courage to execute it. But whereas I cannot give you courage — you must ask the Lord of Hosts for that — I can remind you of the way to the solution.
St. Athanasius gave us the example, when the Church in his days was overrun by Arian heretics. They went so far as to get him expelled from his diocese of Alexandria, several times!
But did he retire, write a book and attend conferences to sell it? Like so many cancelled Bishops and priests and religious do?
Not at all.
He became an even more fierce warrior.
He traveled the Empire of Rome visiting dioceses which had no Catholic Bishop, because the Bishop they had had embraced the Arian heresy, or because the people and clergy had elected an Arian to lead them.
In these Dioceses, St. Athanasius publicly called the Faithful together, denounced Arianism, exhorted them to chose a Catholic as a Bishop, and when elected, consecrated him as their Bishop.
This shows the radical difference between St. Athanasius and Donatists, who separated themselves and remained separate and local forever.
It also shows what is radically not-Catholic in the behavior of so many self-styled Traditionalists, who, as in the case of the SSPX or sedevacantists, get their men validly consecrated as Bishops or ordained as priests, but stay apart and run their own private associations and club-chapels.
In every diocese of the Catholic Church, there are 3 present situations:
Either the diocese has no bishop, because he retired or died, and none yet has been appointed.
Or, the diocese has a Bishop appointed by Pope Benedict XVI, John Paul II, or if they are one of the 23 Eastern Rites, by the vote of the Metropolitan Council (approved by one or the other of these popes).
Or the diocese has a Bishop appointed by the Anti-Pope, Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who parades around the world as Pope Francis, though he has no more authority than a dried fig.
In all such dioceses, Catholics can do something to restore their local Church to communion with Pope Benedict XVI.
And they have the natural, divine and canonical right to act seeing that Pope Benedict XVI on Feb. 11, 2013 declared his see impeded, renounced the petrine ministry, and put the Church into a State of Emergency, as his own secretary confirmed at the Gregorian University in the spring of 2016.
Therefore,
In dioceses in which there is no bishop, Catholics can publicly gather and elect their own bishop. They have this right because the Apostolic See is impeded and because there is no other way to have a bishop, but to elect one by the local faithful resident in the Diocese, they may resort to this means as a self-defense (natural right), as an exercise of subsidiarity by divine right (when the higher power in the Mystical Body fails, the lower can exercise that power), and for the salvation of souls which is the highest law of the Church (canonical right), since the local Church cannot exist in good health and persevere without its own head, a Bishop.
In dioceses, where there is a bishop, appointed by the Anti-pope, then can publically call him out, explain why he has no right to the Bishopric and if he fails to return to communion with Pope Benedict XVI in 90 days, proceed to elect a Catholic man, who is celibate, to be their Bishop.
In dioceses, where there is a bishop, appointed by Pope Benedict XVI, they can publicly call him back to communion with the Pope, and if he fails to return to communion in 90, publicly declare him in schism from the Apostolic See, and proceed to the election of a catholic.
All this could have been done as early as Feb. 29, 2013.
And there is no need to wait for the death or restoration of Pope Benedict XVI.
There is in particular, no need to wait the election of Pope Benedict’s successor or Bergoglio’s death or faux resignation.
So the duty and burden of responsibility is entirely on Catholics in every diocese.
As for getting the men elected consecrated as Catholic Bishops: any bishop can do this, whether retired, or not. There are Bishops publicly and privately in communion with Pope Benedict XVI. They can act, and they should act. Also, because the Apostolic See is impeded, any Catholic bishop elect has the authority to reconcile to the Catholic Church any validly consecrated schismatic Bishop, and then have him consecrate him the Bishop of the diocese for which he has been elected. — This St. Alphonsus dei Liguori says is licit, in the case in which there is no Catholic Bishop(s) to do the consecration. And that a Bishop elect, not yet consecrated, has power of jurisdiction is an old principle established by the practice of the Apostolic See, both in regard to the election of laymen as Roman Pontiffs, and the appointment of non-Bishops to episcopal sees in remote lands.
So what are you waiting for?
Why have you not acted? Perhaps no one told you this.
Now you know.
And start organizing delegations to go to pro-Benedict Bishops to get these Catholic men consecrated.
If we mobilize, we can restore the hierarchy in less than 1 YEAR.
