2 thoughts on “Coffin interviews Accosta on Pope Benedict XVI’s Renunciation — Part II”
Comments are closed.
Comments are closed.
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |
This post is perhaps the most significant aid to truth you may have posted on your blog. Quote: “It is asserted that the challenges to a certain papal election must take place “immediately,” or otherwise the adhaesio doctrine teaches that the Pope is the Pope. Which raises the question: what does “immediately” even mean?” — The moment I saw Bergoglio step onto the balcony of St Peter’s, before he opened his mouth, everything in me revolted, and my stomach knotted in terror. I was confused at my own gut reaction– I wanted to love the new Pope. Then he opened his mouth, and by time he finished, my mind was telling me, “This is not the way a pope behaves– wrong, wrong, wrong. . .”
But as a loyal little sheep who loves my church, I said nothing and forced myself to nominally accept him as pope.
But I had doubts from the first moment, though I said nothing for a long time. [Until I realised he was *also* through ambiguity, advocating heresy] What did I, a layperson know? However much later, I learned that MANY other people had the same visceral revulsion upon first seeing him, that I did.
So: — many of the laity interiorly challenged Bergoglio’s legitimacy on a purely interior and mystical level from the day he was “elected”. I conclude this was Sensus fidei , folks, in action! Comment?