by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

There is a saying at Rome, which is one of the rules of Vatican journalism: Don’t believe anything until someone denies it. My contacts in the press corps explain further, than when they do, then it’s totally credible and frightens those in power.

This is not how we reason in the English speaking world, but in Rome, do as Romans do.

So I now must report on the absurd rush by the Jesuit magazine, Famiglia Cristiana — whose name means, “Christian Family”, but who doctrine in recent decades is “Marxist Family” — to discount the Dec. 7, 2021 report by John Gizzi of Newsmax that Bergoglio is dying and that the College of Cardinals has already begun preliminary preparations to convene a new Conclave.

First I will report what was said, through Aleteia.it, a known CIA funded news outlet affiliated with that of the same name in the USA, which recounted the counter-claim by Famiglia Cristiana.

The nephew of Jorge Mario Bergoglio, by one of his sisters, is quoted as saying,

“«Lo vedo molto bene – dice il nipote di Papa Francesco – con tanta forza, non dimostra l’età che ha. È molto attivo, entusiasta, non si spegne. Ha detto che alcuni si aspettavano che questa malattia lo facesse tacere un po’, però no: sta molto bene!»

Which in English is:

“I see him as one in very good condition” — says the nephew of Pope Francis — “with a lot of strength, he does not show his age.  He is very active, enthusiastic, he is not burning out. He said that some were expecting that this sickness would make him be a little more silent, but no: he is is very good heath!”

Commentary

And who is this nephew of Bergoglio who works between Cordoba and Rome. First, is he the learned Jesuit, Padre Luis Jose Narvaja, who curated the collection of the writings of FatherAngelo Fiorito, of the Jesuit Province of Argentina (here) and who received several press reports covering the presentation of his work 2 years ago?

Its the same name. But 2 years ago, no one claimed he was the nephew of Bergoglio. Now, however, when a denial is needed, out pops that detail.

But there is another problem, does the nephew actually know anything?

Another report from November last year does cite a Jesuit by this  same name and identifies him as the nephew (here), and this one from the Spanish speaking world at least lends one to believe it is better informed. But it reveals a lot more with the photo it includes, of the nephew standing alongside the uncle from a photo from back in 2001.

So ostensibly they have not met during the last 20 years.

The concern, however, of any objective reader, therefore, must be that this nephew knows nothing actual about the health condition of his uncle. And if you read his words, that becomes clear. I would only comment that it is true that he is not burning out, because because of his degenerative colon issue, he is probably more like bleeding out.

Analysis

And, thus, the conclusion must be that the Famiglia Cristiana, who is advance-leaking a quote from the nephew which is to be published in an interview on De. 17, Bergoglio’s birthday, is that DESPERATION AND PANIC has gripped the halls of Bergoglian covens here at Rome.

Because when a journalist from a main news source such as NewsMax reports the words of a secretary of a powerful cardinal in the Curia, and to deny these you have to run to a pre-prepared quote from a nephew who has not met the pope for some 20 years, you are grasping for straw.

And, since Famiglia Cristiana is a very influential and well resourced publication with many contacts in the Vatican, it is utterly laughable that they have tried to squelch the news by Gizzi by such a silly trope. They could have instead called the Office of the College of Cardinals and asked if preparatory preparations have begun for a Conclave. They do not say that they did, if they did. Which says a lot.

And that means, that all their sources in the Vatican are silent and won’t discount Gizzi.

And you know what that means.

—————

CREDITS: The featured image is a screenshot of the Aleteia article commented on above. It features a laughing Bergoglio, in pure gay agit prop style. But that trick is not going to save them now.

This report is originally from NewsMax. But we will quote the story from a site which likes saying FromRome.Info is not reliable, and omits saying we are, or remembering we are, since we told the world months ago about this news.

But if you want to see an image excerpt of the original story, published by Bree A Dail, who works for a US Military Intelligence contractor, here at Rome, here you go:

by Andrea Cionci

Authorized English Translation
(For Links in original Article marked with “HERE” see article above)

As we have already said, on the anti-papal coup suffered by Benedict XVI, this is the first, extraordinary “participatory investigation” in the history of journalism . There are so many inputs, reports, information, documents that have come from simple readers, good Catholics who do not accept to see their Faith and their Church destroyed under the globalist agenda, without doing anything. In this regard, anyone with suggestions or information can write to codiceratzinger@libero.it : we will carefully examine all the material received, checking it carefully.

The Testimony of Vittorio Messori

A reader sent us yesterday the complete recording, made by a spectator, of a public meeting that took place in June 2016 at the Franciscan Rosetum Center in Milan . The protagonist, the most authoritative and famous of Catholic journalists, Vittorio Messori, who presented his latest book “Hypothesis on Mary”. HERE you will find the official recording of the event from which, however , the final part was cut out, with questions from the public, during which the Turinese journalist made shocking statements which are only now finding a very precise location. We make the material available to interested colleagues and in the meantime we report the exact words of Vittorio Messori:

“In September I had a private meeting with the ‘pope emeritus’, as he wanted to be called. A really strong friendship was born with Ratzinger with that book “The Ratzinger Report” (1984) that we did together. He, with his typical generosity, wanted to repay me with his friendship, so much so that, at times, we would go for dinner together in a trattoria in Trastevere. This personal relationship has continued, but since February 11, 2013  I have not come back because I wanted to respect his retirement. It was his secretary (Mons. Gaenswein ed) who phoned me saying: “His Holiness would be happy to see you again in the name of the old past, come and visit him in his retreat, howeverit is understood that His Holiness awaits you as a friend and not as a journalist. Yours will be a private meeting and therefore there will be no public things to offer ”.

“I strictly adhered to this even if, of course, as an old journalist, if I had told Corriere some of the things Ratzinger told me, well… I would have filled the news for a long time. But I did violence to myself, and no one, not even with pincers, will ever get me out of what Ratzinger really told me. The only thing I could say – which however is significant – is that when Ratzinger asked me for my opinion on the current situation of the Church, I sincerely expressed this climate of perplexity (to put it mildly), of restlessness. curiosity about how it will end, in the face of certain experiments. Anyway, I told him how I thought and it is quite significant how, after listening to me,he opened his hands, raised his eyes to heaven and said: “I can only pray.” But know that only the news that others decide reaches him. I discovered, for example, that he only receives two newspapers: the Corriere della Sera and the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. That is, when they come to say: “… but there is Ratzinger who is enthusiastic about his successor!”, I do not see what he could be enthusiastic about, or indignant, since the news does not reach him. He does not see the TV, he does not listen to the radio, he only gets the Corriere who is pro-pope (Bergoglio ed). POPE RATZINGER IS COMPLETELY UNINFORMED . Anyway, whoever lives will see”.

Even if we are immersed in a dystopian reality, can you for a moment realize what this means? A pope, albeit an “emeritus”, who only receives two newspapers and is completely uninformed. Normal, isn’t it? Above all, the journalist friends who come to visit it must not publish anything, while the journalists for “Pope Francis” such as Massimo Franco, of the very Bergoglian Corriere della Sera, can do so! The greatest Catholic journalist who says: “You won’t even take away what Ratzinger told me with pliers, otherwise I would have filled the news for weeks”.

Now, let’s be honest: do we want to say that Vittorio Messori is also a conspiracy theorist?

Did you understand why we have  been telling the pure truth by writing every day that the real pope is only Benedict XVI, and he is in a situation of IMPEDED SEE?

As we repeat for the umpteenth time, he, on February 11, 2013, pronounced a Declaratio that only to those who were in bad faith and wanted to get rid of him could seem a renunciation. In fact, despite the manipulations carried out on the translations, the Declaratio as renunciation is canonically invalid and implosive, while it is completely consistent as a declaration – non-juridical – of self-exile in an impeded See (canon 412). For this reason “the pope is only one” , as Benedict XVI has repeated for eight years, without ever specifying which one, and for this reason he sends us all the messages in the now well-known “Ratzinger Code” (HERE) which shape exactly, constantly this canonical situation thanks to which Bishop Bergoglio self-schismed and became a usurper antipope. You will find the whole investigation rearranged from the beginning, by chapters, at the bottom of this article HERE .

Now, we say it with affectionate concern to the other colleagues and to the members of the clergy who continue to carefully avoid these macroscopic, previously unknown canonical, circumstantial, theological, historical, documentary, testimonial evidences, refusing even to discuss them: how much do you think we can still keep in mind, alive the tale of the abdication, “of the old retrograde pope who, too old and with one foot in the grave (for eight years), agrees to step aside to make room for the good Pope Francis, merciful and revolutionary “? History teaches that, Darwinian impostures do not stand the test of time , and it is in the logic of Plan B HERE that we certainly arrive at a revealing moment. Then, many careers will go up in smoke in a flash.

Moreover, in an age like this where everything is controlled, filmed, recorded, transcribed and just a click away, it is completely crazy and anachronistic to believe that we can keep any secret, even more so one of the kind, moreover with a ‘ investigation in progress, well known, carried out on Libero and ByoBlu, in which thousands of readers from all over the world can potentially participate.

Let us remember what Someone once said long ago: “If they keep silent, the stones will cry out.”