Guest Editorials

Why do So Many refuse to see it?

7 Comments

A Commentary by David Webster

https://twitter.com/CatholicSat/status/1361310604133343237

Dr. Taylor Marshall’s commentary on this blasphemy, a bit down on the twitter page, …

https://twitter.com/TaylorRMarshall/status/1361477382264217604

though correctly concluding that God (the true God) cannot possibly contaminate himself with our sin, completely fails to understand what false prophet Bergoglio means by the word “contaminate” in reference to who he calls “God,” as his “God” could only be Satan, whose Jesuit ethics is “the end justifies the means”. Citing Bergoglio’ statement that ” ‘God’ cannot sin” he wrongly concludes Bergoglio is merely caught in a contradiction or a misuse of a word when its who Bergoglio believes is “God” is the real issue  Why is Marshall so blind to what this false prophet is saying?

What Bergoglio is saying is that while “God” (who he obviously confuses with Satan/Lucifer) cannot personally act in sin, he, (as his end always justifies him), nevertheless gives mankind a different standard and tolerates his sin with no need for repentance and conversion, and simply overlooks it. That indeed is a very real contamination of his “God” but its justified and even lauded because its for a good cause!   That indeed is Bergoglio’ very consistent ” theology” of an all merciful “God,” where there is no Hell or eternal death, a true spin off of Satan/Lucifer’s “Thou shalt not die” to Eve!

Marshall, sad to say, has a serious lack of spiritual discernment, which he has refused to acknowledge and thus continues to call the apostate, antiChrist, antipope Fraudcis “The Holy Father!”

CATHOLICS NEED TO ASK THEMSELVES, WHO IS THE GREATER THREAT? THE THIEF THAT ENTERS THE HOUSE TO STEAL AND DESTROY OR THE ONE WHO UNLOCKS THE DOOR AND LETS HIM IN AND THOSE WHO LET THEIR OWN HOUSE BE LOOTED?

On the larger context of Bergoglio’ message which was his using Jesus contact with a leper (whom Jesus heals!)  in an attempt to push his perverted view of a contaminated compromising “God” (i.e. Satan): Our Lord neither approves of this man’s leprosy or tolerates it, He destroys it!

BERGOGLIO IS AN ANTICHRIST SON OF SATAN AND WE STILL HAVE MOST OF OUR PRIESTS OFFERING THE MASS IN UNION WITH HIM!

WE ALSO HAVE MANY OF THE LAITY WHO THINK THEY CAN CHANGE THE MASS BY MENTALLY SUBSTITUTING BENEDICT’S NAME!!!

BOY, ARE WE IN TROUBLE!!

With Globalist Censorship growing daily, No one will ever know about the above article, if you do not share it.

7 thoughts on “Why do So Many refuse to see it?”

  1. Honestly Brother, I think the faithful who can’t see the truth have been demonically compromised. “…insomuch as to deceived even the elect.”

    1. Inasmuch as it is diabolic to not have the habit of seeking and living by the truth, I think you are correct. Jesus is the Truth. If we do not respect truths, how can we say that we believe and love Him who is the Truth.

      1. Indubitably. I would also add that if you are not actively resisting the influence of Satan, you are highly susceptible to all his tricks, games and blasphemies. I fear that most Roman Catholics have no idea how to combat the active force of Evil, nor do most even believe in it its existence. Some of the blame lies with clergy who either don’t preach about it, or that even believe in Satan and his evil spirits…

  2. Any clues in Holy Scripture or the Catechism or just intuition how long we’ll have to endure this Age of the Demons?

    1. Once the Antichrist appears, 3 1/2 years. However, between then and now who knows. I sometimes long for the Great Tribulation to just begin so we can be closer to the time for the return of Our Beloved Savior… It is all in God’s timing.

  3. I suppose if Marshall held to an opinion that might (to his mind) cause scandal, or technically have him thought to hold a schismatic position, he could always refer to Francis as the “purported” Pope.
    Withholding judgement about this is not necessarily cowardly fence-sitting.
    I honestly believe that things are so muddled right now, that withholding one’s judgment as to Francis’ legitimacy as Pope (or whether the Novus Ordo rites/Sacraments/Ordinations are valid or not) is not wrong or sinful.
    To say one knows with certainty is akin to setting oneself as having the authority that many deny is held by Francis!
    Believe what you believe and seek the a Truth. But be careful when assigning authority to any person, idea or statement.

Comments are closed.