New Draghi Government in Italy, planned by Bilderbergers in 2019

Summary and commentary by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

Francesco Amodeo on Aug. 31/Sept. 1, 2020 predicted that the Conte government would collapse at the end of 2020 and be taken down by Matteo Renzi. And so it has happened.

The decision was made at the Bilderberg Meeting in 2019, where Matteo Renzi was asked to break from the Italian Democratic Party so as become the instrument by which the Conte government could be caused to collapse and Mario Draghi could be brought back into power, with the support of Forza Nuova and the Salvini branch of the Lega.

In April 2019, he further predicted that some shock to the economy would be created to justify the change in government. He calls the future Draghi government, the “Goldman Sachs Government”.

So far Forza Nuova and the Lega which is lead by Salvini has not yet signed on.

Italy is in tumult in recent days, after an official state run channel allowed two speakers, a journalist and psychologist, advise the public that it was not opportune that there be new elections, because the center-right coalition would wipe the ruling parties out of power for years, and end up choosing the next President of the Republic!

It is absolutely clear, therefore, that the Italian Parliament is not the government of Italy. The government of Italy is the Bilderberg Masonic Alliance.


For the first time in Centuries: Disputed Questions, live from Bagnoregio!

Br. Bugnolo is President of The Scholasticum, an institute of medieval studies for the revival of the Scholastic Method. On March 14, 2021 (the annual celebration of the translation of the relics of St. Bonaventure, at Bagnoregio), Br. Bugnolo will be at Bagnoregio to celebrate the Quaestiones Disputatae of his students at the Scholasticum, on the First Book of Sentences of Master Peter LombardOn the One and Triune God — This will be the first public celebration of Disputed Questions in the tradition of the University of Paris since the Middle Ages. And you can watch live at the Official Channel of the Institute. Here in the above video is the announcement.

Br. Bugnolo asks that you help The Scholasticum get 1000 subscribers before March 14th, by subscribing to their official channel (link here). Thank you!

Müller’s attack on Pope Benedict XVI and reality

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

February 3, 2021 A. D.: On Monday of this week, First Things published a rambling diatribe by Mons. Müller, the head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, against reality itself, and hence against Pope Benedict XVI.

There does not seem to be any reason to it other than that. Because next week is the 8th Anniversary of nothing, and it appears that Bishop Müller is worried that the narrative that something happened needs to be sustained again.

So frightened is the Vatican to sustain their false narrative that they had me arrested last year on Feb. 11, 2020, for the crime of standing in Saint Peter’s square with a cellphone interviewing Catholics who had come there to proclaim the truth of the Gospel, namely, that Pope Benedict XVI is still the pope until he renounces the papacy.

That First Things would publish Müller’s rambling essay is another sign of its intellectual decline. But the essay merits a public rebuke from FromRome.Info, seeing that it was published by the German language magazine, here at Rome, which calls itself “Vatican” and sustains not only a non-factual version of reality, but pretends that in the Catholic Church the mere assertion of a narrative makes that narrative true.

Muller’s article is entitled, therein, Why There is only one pope. You can read the article in English translation (though not of the entire article) by clicking the image above.

Readers of FromRome.Info can see the problem with the article from the get go. Müller misidentifies who is the only one Pope. But he has personal and grave motives to do so, because Pope Benedict XVI never made him a Cardinal, and Bergoglio pretended to do so. So you would confess yourself to be a fake Cardinal, if you confessed the truth that Benedict XVI is still the one and only true pope.

First, let me say that Müller’s article is not theology, and it is not an argument. It does not try to demonstrate or prove anything. It is merely a rambling stream of consciousness from a cleric who wants things in reality to be the way that the narrative which serves him demands them to be.

Müller’s appointment to the CDF back in the summer of 2012 A. D. was a scandal. I remember the outcry from Catholics throughout Italy, since I was in Rome at the time, having just finished my first year in theology studies. Müller was considered entirely unfit for the office because he had sustained — and had publicly affirmed that he had not retracted — 2 heresies, one a metaphysical absurdity, another a blasphemy against the Mother of God and God’s own Goodness: namely, (1) that Christ’s entire corporal humanity was not present in the Blessed Sacrament, only his philosophical human nature abstracted from all accidents, and (2) that Our Lady lost her physical virginity when She gave birth to Our Lord Jesus Christ, because His birth was not miraculous but was in every way ordinary.

But I digress.

Müller is such a fine theologian, and it can be seen in how he destroys his entire argument from the opening. He writes,

When Pope Benedict XVI stepped down from the Petrine ministry on February 28, 2013, and Francis was elected pope on March 13 of that year, a totally new situation was created, one not previously known in the history of the papacy and the Church. We still lack dogmatically adequate ways of understanding and expressing it.

This is the kind of screed that would earn you 0 in a first year exam in theology. It is a laughable non sequitur. For if Benedict XVI did resign, then there is only one pope, and there have been numerous papal resignations in the past, wherein a pope succeeded a pope who resigned. — On the other hand, if the situation is entirely new, then the Pope did not resign.

The game that Müller is playing here is attempting to repackage reality into the box, wherein the only thing new is in appearances, namely that Benedict XVI continues to comport himself as a pope, because he is a Pope emeritus.

But you cannot say that, because then the absurdity that Müller is claiming would become more apparent.

Because either you accept the historical fact of what Benedict XVI did and interpret it accordingly, or you insist on an interpretation and you re-read reality to fit that interpretation.

The forensic method which every modern police force in the world uses today follows the former approach. And reasons objectively.

Pope Benedict XVI said he renounced the ministry which he had received through the hands of the Cardinals.

The only law in force, on Feb. 11, 2013, which judged the validity of a papal resignation is Canon 332 §2. In that Canon it clearly states,

If it happen that the Roman pontiff renounces his munus….

That did not happen. Therefore, Joseph Ratzinger is still Pope Benedict XVI.

Even the consequent actions of Pope Benedict XVI manifest that this is the case: he wears the Papal White, he signs as Pastor of Pastors (P. P.), he gives the Apostolic Blessing, he affirms in his most recent biography that he never intended to renounce the spiritual reality of the papal office.

Ergo, Pope Benedict XVI is still the pope.

Müller can ramble all day long, but his essay brings forward no proof for his position to the contrary. And his emotings are not a proof. In the Catholic Church you do not prove something by merely asserting your position over and over again.

The article, as you read it, clearly gives the sense of a propaganda piece that you would expect in a newspaper run by the Chinese Communist Party. Full of party speak and lacking entirely in substance.

But in doing so, Mons. Müller has also attacked Pope Benedict XVI. Because charity requires that we not only live in the truth, but that we speak about reality according to the norm of truth. If our superior acts we say he has acted, and we do not say he has done what he himself does not say he has done. We judge events on the basis of truth, and legal acts on the basis of the proper and appropriate laws. And we do not implicitly insult our superior for being unjust — as Müller does when he says, without saying it, that Benedict XVI should not dress in white or bear the papal dignity.

Müller’s article was solicited by Bergoglio, whose health is declining fast. Like Cardinal Pell who last December attacked Pope Benedict XVI publicly for comporting himself as the Pope, Müller has joined the attack. Pell’s missive failed, Benedict XVI still comports himself as the Pope. Müller’s will fail also, because as Christ promises: The gates of Hell shall not prevail against My Church.

The utter baselessness of the position of Müller shows how totally unsubstantiated his position is even after 8 years. The conspirators to dethrone Benedict XVI have not succeed in convincing anyone. Because men are rational and demand rational arguments to be convinced. But as the ancient maxim says, contra facta nullum argumentum est! — Against the facts, there is no argument.

And that means, the return of Pope Benedict XVI to the Papal Throne is ever more certain, once Bergoglio is called before the Tribunal of God.

How to start a Revolution

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

One of the biggest yet unsolved problems in the Scamdemic is how the people return to liberty. If it seems that no politician or political party has the will to end the Scamdemic, then the people have no other future but death or revolution.

Let us pray that the leaders of the world repent, and that the political parties who can turn back the downward spiral to world enslavement, do something.

But failing that, the People need to start a revolution.

And to do that, they need to know how to start a revolution.

Now, being a son of St. Francis, I am inclined to peace and non violent methods. And so, here I propose a modern peaceful way to start and sustain a revolution.

Step 1

Wait for the enemies of liberty to get the people mad enough that they want a revolution.

Step 2

Speak to the people who want a revolution, and convince them to declare independence from the NWO, Deep State, Scamdemic etc..

Step 3

Use citizen’s arrest powers to arrest EVERY official: I mean every official: every mayor, town govt employee, policeman, judge, justice of the peace.

This Every is very important. Because if you arrest everyone of these using citizen’s arrest powers, then no one can arrest you.  And if the state or province or national governments sends officials to arrest you for arresting everyone, then arrest them too.

During arrests, remember to advise the one being arrested that if he resists that you are authorized to use force, even lethal force. If he is armed, approach with superior numbers and demand he disarm himself.  Follow standard police proceedures.

Place arrested individuals in town and county jails as soon as these facilities are also liberated. Cut off power, water and phone if necessary to cause the surrender of these facilities. Point out that peaceful surrendered will result in good treatment, but resistance will be considered criminal.

Step 4

Spread the Revolution, by raising militia in every town that is liberated, and march upon the neighboring towns.

Step 5

Repeat steps 2, 3 and 4 over and over until your nation is liberated.


Of course it will help if you live in a country with the right to bear arms, but there is nearly always some veterans of the police, military and hunters who can be counted on, who are patriots.

Make use of the militant unarmed, too, to swarm government officials and distract them while you are arresting their peers.

And above all, do not let anyone know you have begun or are planning to being a revolution. Do everything off grid and without cellphones, internet or wireless devices withing ear shot or eye gaze.

And no, this post is not satire.

CREDITS: The featured image is from the Wiki How article entitled, How to Start a Revolution.