FROMROME.INFO republishes this even at the risk of being shut down, because the salvation of souls and of lives is more important than any blog!
News Review by David Webster
THE NEO-FASCIST NEW WORLD ORDER (“THE BEAST”) RULING THE WORLD PLANS ELIMINATING 80% OF THE WORLD’S POPULATION AND TOTALLY CONTROLLING THE REST USING MEDICAL TYRANNY.
MASKS DO NOT WORK AND ARE MAKING YOU SUSCEPTIBLE TO SERIOUS HEALTH ISSUES LIKE DEADLY PNEUMONIA THIS WINTER. AND THOSE PUSHING IT KNOW IT!! FALSE PCR TESTS, FALSE DEATH RATES “WITH COVID”, AND THIS NEW EMERGING “HEALTH CRISIS” WILL BE USED TO SCARE US INTO A NEW MANDATORY RNA/DNA ALTERING “VACCINATION” THAT WILL MONITOR AND CONTROL US JUST AS WE HAVE BEEN WARNED ABOUT IN REVELATION 13:15-18. HOW FULLY ENTRENCH IN THE WORLD THIS TYRANNY BECOMES IS TOTALLY UP TO US!! CONFORMING TO THIS TYRANNY IS CONCESSION TO THE BEAST!
Nine studies, by NON-GOVERNMENT OWNED scientists, physicists, surgeons, microbiologists and other doctors warn about masking:
https://www.globalresearch.ca/facemasks-rising-crime-us/5718393
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00173017
17 Medical Articles Debunking Masking and Warning of their Health Hazards:
1) “There is little evidence to support the effectiveness of face masks to reduce the risk of infection.” https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/64D368496EBDE0AFCC6639CCC9D8BC05/S0950268809991658a.pdf/face_masks_to_prevent_transmission_of_influenza_virus_a_systematic_review.pdf
2) “…laboratory-confirmed viral infections were significantly higher in the cloth masks group. Virus particle penetration was almost 97%. …the results caution against the use of cloth masks.. Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks, and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection.”
3) “…surgical and handmade masks, and face shields, generate significant leakage jets that have the potential to disperse virus-laden fluid particles by several meters. ….They all showed an intense backward jet for heavy breathing and coughing conditions. It is important to be aware of this jet, to avoid a false sense of security that may arise when standing to the side of, or behind, a person wearing a surgical, or handmade mask, or shield.” https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2005/2005.10720.pdf
4) JAMA: “Face masks should not be worn by healthy individuals to protect themselves from acquiring respiratory infection because there is no evidence to suggest that face masks worn by healthy individuals are effective in preventing people from becoming ill.” https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2762694
5) “Face mask use in health care workers has not been demonstrated to provide benefit in terms of cold symptoms or getting colds.” https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19216002/
6) From one meta analysis of masks to prevent infection, N95 masks and respirators no less: “None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator use and protection against influenza infection.” https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22188875/
7) “…both surgical and cotton masks seem to be ineffective in preventing the dissemination of SARS-CoV-2 from the coughs of patients with COVID-19 to the environment and external mask surface.” https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-1342
8) NEJM: “We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. ….The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.” https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2006372
9) Respiratory acidosis is bad and leads to also polyuria, urinary acidosis, kidney damage, and hypercapnia. The stress response from lowered oxygen causes cortisol to rise, potently so, which lowers immune vigilance increasing infection risk. “Respiratory acidosis develops when air into and exhaled from the lungs does not get adequately exchanged between the carbon dioxide from the body and oxygen from the air.” https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/313110
10) Deoxygenation is bad and not only leads to and/or exacerbates headaches disorders, a hypoxic state can create and/or activate malignant cells within 48 hours. Know what else leads to increased cancer risk? Acidosis. (note article above this one on respiratory acidosis) This is old work from Otto Warburg himself. “Most health care workers develop de novo PPE associated headaches or exacerbation of their pre-existing headache disorders.” https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32232837/
11) The meta analysis is the most reliable data set as the reproducibility of results is scientifically so powerful.
Long, Y. et al. (2020) “Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks against influenza: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” J Evid Based Med. 2020; 1- 9. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jebm.12381
12) “A total of six RCTs involving 9,171 participants were included. There were no statistically significant differences in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza, laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infections, laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, and influenza-like illness using N95 respirators and surgical masks. Meta-analysis indicated a protective effect of N95 respirators against laboratory-confirmed bacterial colonization (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.43-0.78). The use of N95 respirators compared with surgical masks is not associated with a lower risk of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”
Meta analysis of 17 studies. Key points: “There is little evidence to support the effectiveness of face masks to reduce the risk of infection.” and “None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator use and protection against influenza infection.” https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00307.x
13) A 2017 meta-analysis of 23 studies and six controlled trials found, as did the current 2020 analysis, that yet again there was bias in studies that claimed masks provide protective benefits. The analysis removed the bias and concluded that that masks are not effective: “Self-reported assessment of clinical outcomes was prone to bias. Evidence of a protective effect of masks or respirators against verified respiratory infection (VRI) was not statistically significant.” https://www.cmaj.ca/content/188/8/567
14) Even in May 2020 the CDC (yes, the CDC) published an analysis of several studies that notes the ineffectiveness of hand washing and mask wearing for prevention of influenza infection and transmission. https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article
15) From the CDC, again: “Available evidence shows that (cloth masks)… may even increase the risk of infection due to moisture, liquid diffusion and retention of the virus. Penetration of particles through cloth is reported to be high… Altogether, common fabric cloth masks are not considered protective against respiratory viruses and their use should not be encouraged.” https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/ppe-strategy/face-masks.html
16) Four authors of this scientific analysis of numerous publications has stood since 2011:
“None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator use and protection against influenza infection.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5779801
17) Top EU health officials also agree that masks are pseudoscientific. https://fee.org/articles/europes-top-health-officials-say-masks-arent-helpful-in-beating-covid-19
Finish reading: http://www.tomgrimshaw.com/tomsblog/?p=30515
NEW ONE! 11-21-20 :
STOP WEARNING THE HEALTH DESTROYING MASK!!!* ALL OF US HAVE GOD GIVEN (AND LEGAL) “HEALTH EXEMTIONS” TO THIS SATANIC ASSAULT OVER A VIRUS THAT IS LITTLE MORE THAN A REGULAR FLU !!!
*If you must, conceed to wearing a face sheild, but still do so under protest to this unlawful tyranny. Remind your employer he is perpetuating an illegal evil tyranny and damage to people’s health if he requires masking and that you have a medical exemption from the mask and that Federal HIPA laws prevent him from further inquiry. Remind him he is subjct to legal suit for any health damages by any of his employees.
Former Pfizer Science Officer Reveals Great COVID-19 Scam (Video)
Story at-a-glance
- There are no excess deaths. The same number of people have died in 2020 that, on average, have died in previous years. This simply wouldn’t be the case if we had a lethal pandemic
- The slight uptick in deaths now being reported in the U.K. aren’t due to COVID-19. Data show these deaths — primarily people aged 45 to 65, with equal distribution between the sexes — are mainly due to heart disease, stroke and cancer, which suggests they are excess deaths caused by lack of routine medical care due to the pandemic restrictions [!!!]
- The PCR test is not a valid diagnostic tool and should not be done on the scale we’re now doing it. The high rate of false positives is only fodder for needless fearmongering
- Virtually no one who is asymptomatic has the live virus, but when you run the test at a cycle threshold over 30, meaning you amplify the viral RNA more than 30 times, you end up with a positive test even if the virus is inactive and noninfectious
- According to Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a former vice-president and chief scientific adviser of the drug company Pfizer, very few people [ACTUALLY NO ONE!] will need the COVID-19 vaccine as the mortality rate is so low and the illness is clearly not causing excess deaths
