3 thoughts on “Hundreds of Babies were murdered to make these Vaccines!”

  1. Re: related article ‘Was the Winter Flu vaccine pre-designed to promote a Coronavirus epidemic?
    Q. Does an overall 65% increase in risks of contracting non influenza respiratory infections including coronaviruses (36% increased risk) outweigh the benefits of receiving a flu vaccine that only has an average 40% effectiveness rate and given that according to one study receiving a flu vaccination in the current and previous season may increase aerosol shedding of flu particles 6.3 times more as compared with having no vaccination in those two seasons and also given the risks of vaccine injuries?
    ‘The average effectiveness rating for the flu vaccine between 2004 and 2019 was 40% effective, more accurately stated as 60% failure rate.
    The most effective rating year for the flu vaccine occurred in 2010 and 2011 with 60% effectiveness. In 2004 and 2005, the flu vaccine was rated only 10% effective, and yet it was still mandated for military members with a 90% failure rate.
    The CDC explains that a 10% effectiveness rating indicates a 10% reduction in disease occurrence among the vaccinated group. The influenza vaccine is manufactured up to a year in advance of knowing what prevalent circulating strain of influenza will affect the U.S., so it will likely never have an effectiveness rating greater than 60%.
    The CDC graph below shows the unpredictable range of effectiveness ratings of the annual flu vaccine for the past 10 years:
    There is no published minimum effectiveness rating for a vaccine to be approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or recommended by the CDC. However the FDA has set the minimum effectiveness rating for the pending COVID-19 vaccine approval at 50%. If this FDA 50% effectiveness standard applied to the annual flu vaccine, then it would not have been approved for use in 12 out of the past 16 years.
    Does the flu vaccine increase other health risks?
    The flu vaccine increases risk of contracting non-flu respiratory viruses, including rhinoviruses, enteroviruses and coronaviruses, by 65%. According to Physicians for Informed Consent:
    “Although some studies suggest positive effects of the flu vaccine on the incidence of illness caused by flu viruses, that benefit is potentially outweighed by the negative effects of the flu vaccine on the incidence of non-flu respiratory illness. To address the concern among patients that the flu vaccine causes illness (i.e., acute respiratory illness), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funded a three-year study, published in Vaccine, to analyze the risk of illness after flu vaccination compared to the risk of illness in unvaccinated individuals. The study found there is a 65% increased risk of suffering from a non-flu acute respiratory illness within 14 days of receiving the flu vaccine. The authors state, ‘Patients’ experiences of illness after vaccination may be validated by these results.’ This is important because although flu vaccines target three or four strains of flu virus, over 200 different viruses cause illnesses that produce the same symptoms — fever, headache, aches, pains, cough, and runny nose — as influenza, and more than 85% of acute respiratory illnesses do not involve the flu.”
    The increased risk of contracting coronavirus from receiving the flu vaccine should be included with informed consent between doctors and patients, including military members. There is no justification to mandate a product that increases risk for coronavirus given the social sanctions currently in place.’
    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/military-flu-vaccine-mandate/
    https://physiciansforinformedconsent.org/flu-vaccine/
    ‘Vaccine derived virus interference was significantly associated with coronavirus and human metapneumovirus…’
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X19313647
    NOTE SUBSEQUENT LETTER TO THE EDITOR FROM AUTHOR OF SCIENTIFIC STUDY
    Vaccine Volume 38, Issue 30, 19 June 2020, Page 4651 Letter to the Editor Letter to the Editor
    Author links open overlay panelGreg G.Wolff Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch Air Force Satellite, 2510 5th Street, Bldg 840, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433, United States Available online 26 May 2020.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.04.016 Get rights and content Refers to Greg G. Wolff Influenza vaccination and respiratory virus interference among Department of Defense personnel during the 2017–2018 influenza season Vaccine, Volume 38, Issue 2, 10 January 2020, Pages 350-354
    ‘On 10 January 2020, Greg Wolff published a study examining if seasonal influenza vaccination was associated with an increased odds of becoming infected with a respiratory virus other than influenza, a phenomenon known as virus interference https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X19313647).
    Influenza vaccination data and viral respiratory laboratory results were obtained for the 2017–2018 influenza season. While the study found no association with influenza vaccination and overall risk of becoming infected with other respiratory viruses (slight decrease in odds was observed), when examining the association with influenza vaccination and the risk of becoming infected with specific viruses at the individual level, there were two viruses that showed significantly increased odds (endemic coronavirus and human metapneumovirus).
    Coronavirus results in this study represented the four endemic, regularly circulating strains of coronavirus (229E, NL63, OC43, and HKU1) during the 2017–2018 influenza season, not novel coronavirus (COVID-19). The four circulating strains of coronavirus have existed in the general population for years, first identified in the mid-1960s. At the time of the study, and even at the time of initial electronic publication, COVID-19 was not yet in existence.
    Established levels of immunity in the general population for the four circulating strains of coronavirus at the time of the study when compared to lack of immunity for the novel COVID-19 strain make any sort of correlation between vaccination and COVID-19 invalid.
    Therefore, the results of this study cannot and should not be interpreted to represent any sort of relationship or association of influenza vaccination receipt and COVID-19 illness. Results from this study DO NOT support the anti-vaccination viewpoint of avoiding seasonal influenza vaccination, and in fact should be interpreted in the opposite manner, since significant protection against influenza was associated with vaccination receipt, and a slight decrease in the odds of infection from other respiratory viruses was also noted.
    Results from this study should not be applied to or interpreted with COVID-19 in any way.’
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X20304862
    ‘On January 7, 2020, a novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) was identified as the cause of pneumonia cases in Wuhan City, Hubei Province of China, and additional cases have been found in a growing number of countries.’
    ‘Inovio is advancing its MERS vaccine candidate into Phase 2, in the Middle East where most MERS viral outbreaks have occurred, with the support of its collaborators: The Wistar Institute, Laval University, the NIH’s Rocky Mountain Laboratories, U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID), VGXI/GeneOne Life Science and the International Vaccine Institute.’
    (Published 23rd January 2020)
    https://cepi.net/news_cepi/cepi-to-fund-three-programmes-to-develop-vaccines-against-the-novel-coronavirus-ncov-2019/
    Posted on: Thursday, March 12th 2020 at 10:30 am Written By: GMI Reporter This article is copyrighted by GreenMedInfo LLC, 2020 Visit our Re-post guidelines
    Extract from article….
    ‘According to the study, “vaccine derived virus interference was significantly associated with coronavirus and human metapneumovirus.” More specifically, “Examining non-influenza viruses specifically, the odds of both coronavirus and human metapneumovirus in vaccinated individuals were significantly higher when compared to unvaccinated individuals (OR = 1.36 and 1.51, respectively) (Table 5).” That represents a 36% and 51% increased risk of coronavirus and human metapneumovirus in influenza vaccinated individuals, respectively.
    While the study did find there was significant protection with flu vaccination against most influenza viruses, including also parainfluenza, RSV, and non-influenza virus coinfections, previous research raises red flags. A 2018 study published in PNAS found that receiving a flu vaccination in the current and previous season may increase aerosol shedding of flu particles 6.3 times more as compared with having no vaccination in those two seasons.’
    https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/prestigious-vaccine-journal-flu-vaccine-increases-coronavirus-infection-risk-36-3?
    >

    Like

  2. Having difficulty logging in to WordPress in order to make comments.

    Re: related article

    https://fromrome.info/2020/03/21/bergamo-propaganda-now-seen-as-essential-to-the-corona-hype/

    According to the following data there are currently 644,402 mortalities per annum at a rate of 10.658 per 1000 of population in Italy. That averages out at 1,765 mortalities in Italy every day.

    See very interesting graph showing that rate of change in death rate increased significantly around 2009 and increased again a little in 2019 and then started to plateau out in 2020.

    Moreover see the UN future projections for a very statistically significant rate of increase in mortalities in Italy up to 2050!

    Note it is always important in general to take into consideration the different demographic variables for each country when assessing mortality rates…..age of population, Birth rate, % living in cities, air pollution levels, standard of health care, standard of living, life expectancy, typical causes of death etc.

    https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/ITA/italy/death-rate

    >>

    Like

Leave a Comment (See About Page for comment policy)

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.