by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

On September 5, there will be held here at Rome a large protest called, Save the Children, which is being organized by Forza Nuova, an Italian Facist organization which is controlled by the CIA as part of the Gladio post World War II operation. Forza Nuova shows their allegiance to the USA, by staging their events near the residence of the US Ambassador, who lives across the street from the Circus Maximus. This years protest on the 5th takes place at the Bocca della Verità, round the corner.

That the event, Save the Children, was ideated and planned for months by Forza Nuova was exposed by investigations conducted by Attorney Lillo Musso and confirmed by General Antonio Pappalardo, both of whom each head a political movement which is socialist in inspiration.

But Zagami adds an interesting added detail, namely that American Cardinals will be involved in this Sept. 5 event.

Admittedly Leo Leon Zagami is  Freemason (see his blog, here), but he speaks in a lauditory manner of the participation by these Cardinals through an organization called Vincit Leo Association.

I get the impression that the association is called that because it is financed or backed by those who admire Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke, but this is pure supposition on my part.

The association seeks, in Zagami’s words to:

A recently issued campaign letter which can be read here , informs its readers that “in the coming months Vicit Leo will launch a series of extensive meetings and investigations under the supervision of its Scientific Committee, its Juridical Committee, and its Ethics Committee”and that this “will take place in different countries in Europe, the USA, and around the world.”

The letter signed by Professor Pierfrancesco Belli of the Vicit Leo NGO also says that they “are gathering an overwhelming amount of evidence showing how a planned project of depopulation lies behind these economic interests. There are a lot of people who are responsible for this developing dictatorship: the most important two are Bill Gates and Tedros Ghebreyesus, who appear to want to rule and terrorize the population using AI systems and laws that reduce human rights.”

The Vicit Leo association is also asking for people who share the concerns expressed in the appeal to help them by making a contribution to their campaign and for those with professional expertise in law, medicine, natural science, journalism, and political lobbying to contact them  with ideas to form the professional backbone of this international human rights project that has the support of Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, a staunch enemy of Pope Francis.

FreeMasons have a way of being on both sides of every divide, so as to ensure the control of each part in a theatre which leads always to a masonic goal. So there is no surprise here.

But Archbishop Viganò’s participation is not surprising, since writing to President Trump, he appears to have moved entirely into the geopolitical orbit of the US Government. I think they have selected him to succeed Bergoglio, in a desperate attempt to prevent Peking from taking complete control with Cardinal Tagle, who is Chinese on both sides of his family and has, according to Ann Barnhardt, massive gambling debts at Macao casinos.

Zagami ties up the mystery about the Sept. 5 event. Because he says that the Vicit Leo Association has organized it. That means that Vicit Leo is Forza Nuova is Gladio is the CIA op.  The last Forza Nuova event was a small protest at the Circus Maximus, a place so large the Left wing government rarely grants it to any group for any protest. But Forza Nuova got permission for the 100 protestors. And even got permission to physically beat Italian police with wooden sticks, without being arrested!

Of course, Zagami could be misinformed.

I think Catholics need to wake up and realize that a lot of the news is planned and orchestrated by the Deep State. There is hardly any other rational explanation.

+ + +

 

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

I am looking for 10 lawyers, to help me complete the first step of a work of charity.

The Christian part of the City of Beirut was destroyed by a horrible blast on August 4th.

Ordo Militaris Inc., the humanitarian corporation from Montana, USA, of which I am the president, was the first to start a Fund to hep the victims, on August 5th. This fund is to help the CHRISTIAN victims of the explosion.

So far we have raised about $14,500 USD.

But our goal, in the first step, is to raise $25,000 USD. When that is raised I will go to Lebanon in person to organize a humanitarian organization, staff it, and see that the work of assistance begins.

But I need the help of 10 lawyers.

I ask each of these to donate $1000 to the fund, so I can read the goal this week. This is not much. (I who as a Franciscan brother have nothing, have donated this much.)*

Perhaps you have not heard, but the vast majority of the victims are all Christians. Christian Beirut has been destroyed. Christians, therefore, need to come to the fore to help out.

I ask, therefore, the help of 10 lawyers. Please click this colorful banner to make a donation.

IF YOU HAVE ALREADY GIVEN, thank you! — Please share this article with your colleagues in law and ask them to help. I am asking for 10 lawyers to help, but as the goal is to raise $1 million for humanitarian aide, the more lawyers the merrier!

__________

* In Beirut I have already found a lawyer who will donate pro bono his work to help me in all my legal affairs regarding founding the organization in Lebanon.

Watch the program on Ordo Militaris Radio TV’s YouTube channel.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fktoyOGALzI&feature=youtu.be

Read more about these acts of terrorism on the page for this show at Ordo Militaris Radio TV.

Or listen to the program on Ordo Militaris Radio TV’s MIXCloud channel:

[mixcloud https://www.mixcloud.com/aj-baalman/terror-in-wisconsin-and-around-the-world/ width=100% height=120 hide_cover=1]

Or watch on Ordo Militaris Radio TV’s BITChute channel:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/naTJuAb1udw1/

 

The news was reported via this tweet

https://twitter.com/YellowCube7/status/1300234421451124739

But Twitter byteburned that Tweet 5 seconds after it appeared, for violating community standards. — It did not, it merely retweeted a news article!

But my browser Cache captured it, here is a screen shot:

Look at how many RTs and Favs, it was going viral as I saw it, then Twitter erased it completely…

So here is the information, by other means…

https://twitter.com/o_rips/status/1300305545585278977

 

or How the wisdom of John Paul II will soon save the Church

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

In this article, I will knock out the last Bergoglian argument still standing.

As the truth that Pope Benedict XVI is still the Roman Pontiff sinks into the minds of the whole Church, on account of the fact that it is impossible in any manner to rationally affirm that in renouncing ministerium he did indubitably and thus validly fulfill the requirement of the law to renounce the papal munus, the last refuge of the Bergoglian party, and indeed of the party of Cardinals who think that their consensus is sufficient to transfer the papal office from one man to another — even when this consensus violates papal law and Canon law — has entered the ring in recent weeks. And so, I enter too, to knock it out! This will be a 3 round fight, and bloody. So you are warned in advance, that it is not for Bergoglian babies to watch.

The argument which they think trumps everything is this.

If Benedict XVI is still the pope, when he dies, because none of the Cardinals will enter into a Conclave to elect his successor, the See of Peter would be vacant and the Apostolic Succession ended.  But since it is impossible that Peter be without Successors, then that too is impossible, therefore Benedict cannot be the pope.

This argument was recently used on a blog with 14 readers.

If one thing good can be said of this argument it is, that it is an argument which shows that those who deny that Benedict is the Pope do retain the logical capacity to construct an argument which challenges the first premises of thought.

Ann Barnhardt has pounded on this very aspect for 4 years. She argues that if your premise that Benedict renounced validly leads you, throughout these 7 years, to lose faith in papal infallibility, the indefectibility of the Church or even your faith in God, etc., then your first premise must be wrong.

She argues in many articles that if one accept a false premise, then it is impossible to have a valid conclusion in any syllogism. She also argues that those who cannot free themselves of a false premise are doomed, and in this matter in particular, doomed to lose their faith and become agents of diabolic dissension, confusion and delusion.

But here the Bergoglians and Cardinals-know-all party have admitted they can construct an argument which attempts to dethrone a false first premise.

But the only problem is, they cannot argue. Because in that argument there is a missing middle term, that is, the major of the argument and the minor of the argument do not connect. Here, let me show you:

The major of the argument is:

It is impossible that Peter be without successors.

The minor of the argument is:

Peter would be without successors if Benedict XVI dies without being succeeded, since the Cardinals will not convene a Conclave.

The argument is constructed as a hypothetical contrary to fact. One must understand that it supposes for the sake of argument (pro arguendo) that Benedict XVI is the true pope.

But, in attempting to deny that supposition it simply constructs a weapon against itself. Because the minor of the argument contains 2 independent suppositions, one which is pro arguendo and the other which is a future hypothetical (the Cardinals will not convene to elect a successor to Pope Benedict).

I am spelling this all out in detail, because it’s importance will soon be vital to the continued existence of the Catholic Church on earth.

So since the argument arrives at an impossible, by means of a future hypothetical, the conclusion that the first premise must be false is true, but not in the  way the Bergoglians who employ it claim.

Because, in an argument which intends to destroy a first premise, that is, falsify the first premise, the first premise must be a single proposition, not a proposition composed by two hypotheticals.

If it is composed of two, as it is in this case (that Benedict is the Pope & that the Cardinals will not enter into Conclave after his death), then the argument succeeds ONLY in showing that the CONJUCTION of both hypotheticals is false.

And I agree.

The Wisdom of Pope John Paul II

Inspired by God or warned by the Saints, Pope John Paul II foresaw — I believe — this false argument and prepared the Church to refute it.

He did this in his papal law for Conclaves, published in 1996: Universi Dominici Gregis.

To be precise, he did it in the Law and in his Introductory Letter or Preface to it.

Three Warnings

But before we discuss this, to see its importance, let us review the warnings Pope John Paul II made to the College of Cardinals, in this papal law for conclaves:

First, he warns them of a future resignation, saying:

77. I decree that the dispositions concerning everything that precedes the election of the Roman Pontiff and the carrying out of the election itself must be observed in full, even if the vacancy of the Apostolic See should occur as a result of the resignation of the Supreme Pontiff, in accordance with the provisions of Canon 333 § 2 of the Code of Canon Law and Canon 44 § 2 of the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches.

The reference to Canon 333 §2 reminds the Cardinals that the Pope, not the College of Cardinals makes the laws of the Church and that they are obliged to keep them, even if he is dead or has resigned.

Second, he warns them that they have NO POWER in the Church while a Pope is alive to alter his papal law:

1. During the vacancy of the Apostolic See, the College of Cardinals has no power or jurisdiction in matters which pertain to the Supreme Pontiff during his lifetime or in the exercise of his office; such matters are to be reserved completely and exclusively to the future Pope. I therefore declare null and void any act of power or jurisdiction pertaining to the Roman Pontiff during his lifetime or in the exercise of his office which the College of Cardinals might see fit to exercise, beyond the limits expressly permitted in this Constitution.

Then he warns them finally a third time, in the act of promulgation, at the end of this papal law, that if they fail to keep every part of this law, the Conclave will have an invalid result:

Wherefore, after mature reflection and following the example of my Predecessors, I lay down and prescribe these norms and I order that no one shall presume to contest the present Constitution and anything contained herein for any reason whatsoever. This Constitution is to be completely observed by all, notwithstanding any disposition to the contrary, even if worthy of special mention. It is to be fully and integrally implemented and is to serve as a guide for all to whom it refers.

These warnings make it quite clear that the Cardinals have no authority to organize a coup d’etat, and that they cannot obviate this fact, that they ONLY HAVE AUTHORITY TO ELECT THE ROMAN PONTIFF WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THIS LAW.

This is really a sensational aspect of the Papal Law which has not been noticed by many. Pope John Paul II by these declarations actually REMOVED from the College of Cardinals their monopoly of power to elect the Roman Pontiff, because, whereas in the past they had the power to always validly, legally and canonically elect the Roman Pontiff, now they only had the legal authority to do so. This law strips them of the exclusive right to valid election.

3 Terms that must be understood

To understand this we must review with precision the meaning of three terms: legal, canonical and valid.

What is legal is that which is done according to the obligation or norm of a law which is still enforce.

What is canonical is that which is done, in the strict sense, according to the obligation or norm of a canon which is still enforce.

What is valid is that which is in truth done, either according to the norm of a law or canon, or according to the natural, moral, evangelical, or divine laws.

I understand this distinction, because more than 20 years ago, when I was a member of the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate, I attended a conference in one of our monasteries, where our guardian explained the Rule of Saint Francis according to a very erudite commentary published before the Council by a canonist of the Order of Friars Minor Conventual. This topic arose, because in the Rule of Saint Francis, it binds us friars to “obedience and reverence to the Roman Pontiff and his canonically elected successors”.  And the commentary, as explained, pointed out that in Saint Francis’ days the election of the Roman Pontiff was regulated by canons, but today it is regulated by Papal law. So technically, today we speak of legal elections, not canonical elections, and that therefore the proper and sane reading of the Rule of St. Francis today, means that we should regard St. Francis to mean legal in the present system canon law.

For this reason Pope John Paul II speaks of what is lawful in his papal law, cf. n. 37.

And now for the Wisdom

So, Pope John Paul II checkmated the College of Cardinals in his papal law of 1996. And of course, this being a restriction on them, we certainly have not heard them talk about it, and certainly won’t, since they pretend to rule the Church without any law and allow a lawless man to pretend to be the pope.

But it behooves us to open our eyes and see it. And thus let us reveal the wisdom of Pope John Paul II. I quote from the Introductory Letter to the papal law, Universi Dominici Gregis:

It has been my wish to give particular attention to the age-old institution of the Conclave, the rules and procedures of which have been established and defined by the solemn ordinances of a number of my Predecessors. A careful historical examination confirms both the appropriateness of this institution, given the circumstances in which it originated and gradually took definitive shape, and its continued usefulness for the orderly, expeditious and proper functioning of the election itself, especially in times of tension and upheaval.

Precisely for this reason, while recognizing that theologians and canonists of all times agree that this institution is not of its nature necessary for the valid election of the Roman Pontiff, I confirm by this Constitution that the Conclave is to continue in its essential structure; at the same time, I have made some modifications in order to adapt its procedures to present-day circumstances.

I have prepared you to see the important and key aspect of the Pope’s words, by telling you beforehand to pay attention to the words, legal, canonical and valid.

They key passage is:

Precisely for this reason, while recognizing that theologians and canonists of all times agree that this institution is not of its nature necessary for the valid election of the Roman Pontiff,

Wisdom has its effect,  necessarily

So before warning the Cardinals in the papal law itself, that they were being stripped of a monopoly on power to elect the Roman Pontiff, he makes it quite clear to them, in his letter of introduction, that there remains a valid way to elect the Roman Pontiff apart from the institution of the Conclave.

What are the sane and reasonable conclusions which can be inferred from the Papal law, therefore?

1. The Cardinals only have the legal authority to validly elect a Roman Pontiff in a Conclave which follows all the rules. If they fail on any rule, the election is invalid.
2. The Roman Pontiff can be validly elected outside of a conclave.
3. Canonical elections of the Roman Pontiff regard valid elections during a legal sede vacante, which can occur from a valid resignation (cf. canon 332 §2= or a real death of a Roman Pontiff.

Wisdom for our times

Many of you have noticed that in the argument of Bergoglians which I critiqued above, I omitted to respond to another very apparent weakness, namely in their assertion that no Cardinals will enter into conclave after the death of Pope Benedict XVI to elect his successor. While it is just like Marxists to attempt to control reality by asserting that it is or will be as they want, rather than it is in truth or will be, we cannot be sure one way or another, whether Cardinals will or will not enter a Conclave after his death.

If they do, then there is no legal, valid, or canonical doubt that the man they elect will be the Roman Pontiff. Because by such an act they will entirely repudiate the claim of Bergoglio to be the Pope and entirely repudiate their error in entering into conclave in 2013.

However, if they do not, then it causes no problem. Because of the wisdom of Pope John Paul II in declaring that a Conclave is not necessary to validly elect the Roman Pontiff WHILE AT THE SAME TIME restricting the legal authority of the Cardinals to act in a conclave.

So what will happen if no Conclave is convened after the death of Pope Benedict XVI?

This is the precise question. And the answer is simple.

First, the right to elect the Roman Pontiff is of apostolic tradition consigned to the Roman Church, not to the College of Cardinals. The College of Cardinals only vicariously exercises this right in accord with the norm of law.

So if there is no College, whether because the death of all Cardinal Electors or the schism of all Cardinals (which by canon 1364 removes from them all authority to elect the Pope), their vicarious authority to exercise the Apostolic Right of the Church of Rome passes, and the exercise of that right returns to the Roman Church.

While ancient papal laws and canons reserved that to the Roman Clergy, or Bishops of Rome, since Pope John Paul II in the promulgation of his papal law expressly abrogated all of them, then the exercise of the right returns to its original norm, Apostolic Tradition, wherein all the faithful, clergy and lay, of the Church of Rome have the exclusive right to elect the Roman Pontiff.  This right pertains to all who are Catholic and who hold canonical residence in the Diocese of Rome (1 year or more).

So Benedict XVI will have a successor, because pro arguendo there is without doubt at least a few Catholics left at Rome, in communion with Pope Benedict.

Certitude that the Cardinals are in schism and have lost their legal right to enter into Conclave is had when they violate n. 37, of the Papal law:

37. I furthermore decree that, from the moment when the Apostolic See is lawfully vacant, the Cardinal electors who are present must wait fifteen full days for those who are absent; the College of Cardinals is also granted the faculty to defer, for serious reasons, the beginning of the election for a few days more. But when a maximum of twenty days have elapsed from the beginning of the vacancy of the See, all the Cardinal electors present are obliged to proceed to the election.

Thus from the 21st day onward, the Church of Rome has the right to do what the College fails to do.

Other Questions, answered briefly:

Cardinals who recognize that Bergoglio is the Pope, can then enter into a conclave?

No, because by such a recognition they are schismatics, before the law, and thus are not Cardinals.

Are Cardinals made by Bergoglio valid Cardinals capable of electing a pope?

No, because with Pope Benedict XVI’s renunciation of ministry, all acts of the Roman Curia and of Bergoglio were made null and void.

So by Cardinals, in the article above, you mean only those Cardinals who are Electors who were created by Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI?

Yes.

 

Several reports. The controlled media are saying a few thousands, FromRome.Info has heard reports of upto 5 Million. Remember, these videos are from controlled media.

Ruptly covered the entire event live, here is a 11.5 hour long video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Hr-jdoq-dk

Here is a video by Moris San, an Italian freedom activist, who says there was 5 million. It shows a street filled with protesters to the horizon in both directions:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wulLoxQ-w1M&feature=youtu.be

Mauritius

And here is another showing thousands protesting in the Mauritius Islands against the Corona Controls, also yesterday.

 

There is a report about this at RT.com.

Here are some videos:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ydx71CUgF8&feature=emb_logo

https://twitter.com/SoniaPoulton/status/1299651784311549952

https://youtu.be/X3f3CvtfIE8

https://twitter.com/MitchellCMM/status/1299701792297701376

And David Icke did a video about this, but YouTube ByteBurned it already:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1jtiLdCA9E

ByteBurning is the equivalent of the Renaissance Book Burning, except that when Catholic burned books it was because they contained gross immorality or error. But now social media platforms of the NWO ByteBurn videos and audio tracks, erasing them from the net, whenever they contain TRUTH which fights against their NARRATIVE CONTROL objectives.

Please continue to use ByteBurn as a term, to let everyone know how evil it is what they are doing. A pox on YouTube’s house…

 

Watch on Ordo Militaris Radio TV’s YouTube Channel:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kKdHYSneoCI&feature=youtu.be

Or read more about this on the page for this show, at Ordo Militaris Radio TV.

Or listen to this program on Ordo Militaris Radio TV’s MixCloud channel.

[mixcloud https://www.mixcloud.com/aj-baalman/truth-behind-the-holodomor-famine/ width=100% height=120 hide_cover=1]

Or watch on Ordo Militaris Radio TV‘s BITChute channel.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/q9twdGyrgaRI/

 

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

The entire Masonic Order has labored incessantly for more than 200 years to denigrate the Crusades. They did and do this for a purpose, because to triumph over humanity and enslave mankind, they must first of all DIVIDE everyone from everyone, and second, ENCOURAGE pacifism.

Unity and Militancy were never so concretely, effectively, and internationally organized than during the Catholic Crusades.

So to undermine this WORST OF ALL POSSIBLE REACTIONS to Freemasonry’s plans, the Lodge promotes:

1. Disrupting communications between opponents.
2. Sowing dissention among rivals.
3. Infiltrating all organizations.
4. Creating false oppositions.
5. Disarming opponents very will to fight by convincing them to resist, but not counter-attack.
6. Attacking Jesus Christ, His only true Church, and the examples of our heroic Catholic ancestors.

And yes, even if you are a protestant, if you are of European heritage, ALL YOUR ANCESTORS — if you go back far enough — were Catholics.

This is why the Ordo Militaris Catholicus is truly a work of God, because we are united, international, Catholic crusaders.

We are organized to defend persecuted Christians from all quarters, but also Christians in need.

Lebanon is such a land, and has such a need. The Catholics and Christians need our help, as there is now such a combination of destruction, hyper deflation of the local currency, political collapse and corruption, than 100s of thousands of Catholic are at risk of famine and death.

At the same time the world powers, like vultures, are hovering over Lebanon. Whether Marxist, Islamic or Masonic, Christian Lebanon has no superpowers to help her. It remains for private Christian initiatives, to come to her need.

It is for this reason, the members of the Order have pulled together and heard the cal of charity to help the Lebanese. This is a Crusade of Charity. And for those who do not understand the Crusades, this is the true sense of what it means to Crusade, to send help overseas to our fellow Christians who are suffering.

There is a lot I can do and the Order can do WITH YOUR HELP. But there is no much the Order can do without your further help.

So far nearly $14000 has been raised. I thank those who met my call to donate $1000, and those also who responded in any way they could, many with donations of $100 or more.

But the truth is that we have raised enough only to feed 40 persons for 3 months. I say this to show how little our effort it is.

I know that 10,000 or more will come to know of this article on social media. I thank the about 100 who have donated.

But that means that 9,900 of you have not yet responded in any way. And it is YOU WHO CAN MAKE THE DIFFERENCE.

To have any significant impact and to overcome the many obstacles to this mission of charity, I am asking you to help us raise $1 million dollars US.

I set this goal, because

1. I SEE NO OTHER CATHOLIC APOSTOLATE ON SOCIAL MEDIA raising funds for Lebanon in the English speaking world.
2. I KNOW THAT MANY OF YOU ARE RETIRED and have sufficient funds to make a donation of $100 or $1000.
3. I KNOW THAT WITHOUT DEEDS our profession of faith is without merit before God.
4. I know that we have many punishments due to our personal sins, which cannot be wiped away in this lifetime, without deeds of charity, heroic deeds of charity. For some of you, this means a donation of $100, $1000 or even $10000. — I remember when I  became a friar and gave away my inheritance. It was the least I could do to wipe the slate clean and begin my life again as a servant of Christ my King. If you have true and living Faith, you will see this is true and sensible. Not even heroic.

But above all, because I KNOW THE CATHOLICS OF LEBANON need our help! — So please: you who are well clothed, well fed, well housed and have money in the bank, without debts — GIVE GENEROUSLY by clicking this banner, selecting the currency in which you wish to send your help, and following the instructions you see on your cellphone, tablet, PC or MAC >>

 

News:

https://twitter.com/voxdotcom/status/1299469376656211968

For reference, Jose Manuel Rodrigues Delgado’s bull experiment as shown in this film.

It should be noted, that whereas the Catholic doctor put the device in a bull, Elon Musk has put it in a pig, to signify what he, as a Jew, thinks of plebs.

___________

CREDITS: Images, tweets and video from sources embeded.

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

Today FromRome.Info was cited by a blogger attempting to prove that Benedict is no longer the pope, even though he never resigned according to the norm of canon law.

He actually gets the argument nearly correct. But he dismisses it without reason.

It’s no wonder. According to the stats at FromRome.Info, he has 14 readers of his article. At least that many came through his several links to articles at FromRome.Info, which he linked to, even if he did not read himself.

The substance of his argument is that since FromRome.Info quoted the general opinions of observers during and after Benedict’s trip to Bavaria, whatever we say on anything else is untrustworthy, because you know, news is false, and the ideology that says Benedict is not the pope, despite all canonical evidence, is more real that reality itself.

I laugh. And heartily. The articles he links to his in his blog post got more than 190,000 readers here at FromRome.info. And his article got about 14.

I would say that the Vox Populi vox Dei est. The people know what the truth is. The ideologues of Bergoglio have lost control of the narrative.

The restoration of Pope Benedict XVI and of the Papacy, after him, is close at hand.

Who is this blogger? I won’t mention him, because if I did he would get so many hits his PC in his mother’s basement might break down.

+ + +

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

Watch on Ordo Militaris Radio TV’s YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzX3yco5kRo&feature=youtu.be

Read more at the page for this show at Ordo Militaris Radio TV.

Or Listen to this show on Ordo Militaris Radio TV’s MIXCloud channel:

[mixcloud https://www.mixcloud.com/aj-baalman/truth-behind-the-lincoln-county-war-does-billy-the-kid-deserve-a-pardon/ width=100% height=120 hide_cover=1]

Or Watch this show on Ordo Militaris Radio TV’s BITChute channel:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/HpTwSe90MZIZ/