by Br. Alexis Bugnolo
It was incredible that in 2018, Bergoglio made a secret agreement to surrender the Church in the Peoples’ Republic of China over to the government, actually commanding Catholics to hold communion with heretics and schismatics and to submit to them!
The shameful, cowardly and dishonest Cardinals and Bishops of the world remained silent and did not convene a Council to declare Bergoglio deposed for an act of horrible schism and sacrilege in such a betrayal.
So now it seems that he is eager to go all the way and give the Vatican to Peking.
And his instrument is the man who is increasingly appearing to be his chosen successor.
As has been revealed by the investigations of Fred Martinez at Catholic Monitor Blog, the newest Cardinal of the Bergoglian Church, Luis Antonio Tagle, has Chinese ancestry on both his father and mother’s side of the family. Moreover, he appears to have financial backing from Chinese banks. He speaks Chinese fluently. And in his personal politics he is a diehard Marxist.
As the National Catholic Register reports:
Pope Francis has raised Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle to the rank of cardinal bishop in a new sign of his esteem for the former Archbishop of Manila.
The Holy See press office said May 1 that the pope had designated the prefect of the Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples as a cardinal bishop, along with Cardinal Beniamino Stella, prefect of the Congregation for the Clergy.
The elevation caps a rapid rise for Cardinal Tagle, who only took up his new post in Rome this February.
He had previously served as the 32nd Archbishop of Manila from 2011 to 2020. He was a high-profile figure at the 2018 youth synod. A year later Pope Francis named him head of the powerful Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples, replacing Cardinal Fernando Filoni.
The implications seem clear.
But the complete silence of the Cardinals and Bishops, excepting Cardinal Zen, and the utter do nothingness of the hierarchy, raises a necessary question: how many Bishops and Cardinals have been bribed by the CCP to go along with the transfer of Church properties and power to Peking?
POSTCRIPT: Elizabeth Yore writes about the Vatican deal with China at Breitbart, today.
___________
CREDITS: The Featured Image is a screen shot of the page of the report of the National Catholic Register (owned by EWTN) cited in the article above.
+ + +
[simple-payment id=”5295″]
YEP
Assuming all of what you said takes place, where do we go from here?
If such a thing took place, I think we would have to ask Trump for military intervention and regime change.
Br. Alexis–Yes, the Vatican could be designated as a hostile Communist nation.
It already is!
I was thinking Poland, Switzerland, Italy, Austria, Hungary. The Catholic Church is a bit out of Trump’s wheelhouse.
It may well be his intention to hand over the Vatican to Peking ( although the prediction was Moscow) but it certainly isn’t Our Lord’s. It is vitally important for the consecration of Russia to take place immediately – Our Lady said it would, but late & if this isn’t late, God Help Us. PBXVI together with loyal Bishops could still do this unbeknownst to AF & cronies as the disloyal ones are IMO already excommunicated by their connivance & submission to an Antipope & most probably The False Prophet so their presence would not be relevant. We don’t want WW3 so it would be very necessary for the Russians to be onside if such an undertaking as storming the Vatican were to take place.
Perhaps Bishop Gracida and any other prelates (ahem, cough, cough) can join forces and declare publicly and definitively that Benedict is still the pope, and that Bergoglio is an antipope. Then call a a Council to deal with Vatican II, the Novus Ordo, and all the heretics and apostates. Such cowards and traitors to Our Blessed Lord.
They can call a council. Let us pray that they do. I think because they are Bishops emeritii they think they cannot. But that is not true.
If they will not, then maybe some lowly priests might. God helps those who help themselves.
Only Bishops can call a council, because a council is an act of the College of Bishops, as successors of the Apostles.
What about the priests in Rome? Do they not have canonical status to do such a thing?
Yes, but it would be a Synod, not a Council. But they are for the most part in communion with the Antipope and so are operating under a dominating lie.