The error of Laicism

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

Vatican II unleashed a host of errors. One of them was laicism.

I am not speaking of the European political concept of laicism, which refers to the concept of a state which is not Catholic or religious in its affiliation, but which is secularist. No, I am speaking about the kind which regards the disordered relationship of the laity to the clergy.

Laicism is the idea that the laity should run the Church or can hold offices in the Church, or worse, that they can be as effective or more effective than clergy in the work of the Gospel.

Laicism as an error is completely foreign to Catholicism. It comes from the protestant sects who rejected the priesthood of Christ as something which men could share by the Sacrament of Orders.

In the English speaking world, laicism is a more common error, because there are so many Protestants who convert to the Catholic Faith but keep the error of laicism, because since they made money off religion as protestant laymen, they want to keep making money off religion as catholic laymen.

Laicism is also common in Catholic Media, because social media is a do it by yourself sort of thing, and that allows laymen to begin to assume teaching and preaching roles which do not belong to them.

Obviously, no where in the Gospel is there the least shred of support for the idea that the laity have any role of responsibility in the preaching or teaching of the Church. Yes, they are to give personal witness, but no, they should not take initiatives on their own.

However, the general corruption of the clergy since Vatican II has made the Catholic way of doing things very difficult if not impossible. Seminaries have become institutions to teach vocations not to believe, to accept modernism and to go along with sexual perversion, so long as it is kept generally hidden from the laity.

For that reason 99% of laity today probably do not have a pastor who wants to convert anyone to the Catholic faith AND knows how to do it AND has the time to organize any effort. He is straddled with keeping the parish running with all the demands for the Sacraments upon fewer and fewer clergy.

But this is the malicious feedback of laicism. Because laicism destroys vocations.

Laicism teaches that a young man can start his own apostolate and get a job maybe in the parish. No need for personal commitment of celibacy or the evangelical vows of religion!

Laicism is also exacerbated by the abolition of minor orders.

The Catholic way of things has in practice been abandoned by the clergy who followed Vatican II instead of Catholic tradition. The way back to catholic practice in the apostolate REQUIRES the restoration of the minor orders, not as mere sacramentals of prestige, but as true apostolates and missions.

A local Church which is properly functioning will then have no lone priest serving in the Parish, he will have several dozen men in minor orders — thus no longer laymen — to help him in everything and everywhere he goes.

Until that kind of way of being Church returns, Catholics who wish to defend the Faith or promote a work of mercy need to be very careful not to arrogate to themselves any authority. They need to be humble and not promote their own views contrary to that of any Doctor or Father of the Church. They have to have the common sense not to support members of the Lavender Mafia, or those in denial about Bergoglio.

The natural inclination of good laymen will always be to always defer to the priest. That is a good inclination, but in times of heresy, apostasy or moral depravity, one must be cautious and prudent. Because true obedience is for the upbuilding of the Church, not collaboration in destroying it.

In the mean time, Catholics should listen only to laymen or laywomen who are citing Church documents and Canon Law and showing due respect for the teaching of the Saints, the Doctors and the Fathers of the Church. Those who play games in such matters, should be shunned.

The error of laicism needs to be stamped out. Authentic catholic apostolates will oppose this error and speak against it. Where this error is not opposed, the result will be the death of the local church.

One of the great effects of laicism is in thinking that Pope Benedict XVI is no longer the pope, because he renounced the same thing which a layman renounces when he gives up heading an apostolate at his local parish. Laicism makes Catholics forget that Jesus gave real spiritual powers of governance and mission in the Church called munera which only the clergy can hold and exercise. The singular of munera is munus, not ministry.

_________

CREDITS: The Featured Image above is a screen shot of an article by Dr. Kwasniewski at LifeSite News, a media outlet run by laymen. The article encourages laity to preach, and attempts to craft an argument from magisterial documents which say no such thing. This same media outlet recent called a meeting in Munich Germany a lay event, while showing a picture of Archbishop Vigano on the main article. Laicism in action!

+ + +

 

4 thoughts on “The error of Laicism”

  1. Sadly, since VII’s emphasis on False Ecumenism & dumbing down the role of the clergy by introducing Lay Readers & Extraordinary Ministers of Holy Communion & by deliberately filling their seminaries with homosexual men who never had the fullness of the Faith, this is the outcome they wanted & now have. Religious ecumenism is not & never was part of the Catholic Tradition as the OHC&A Church is the ONLY Church founded by Christ for all to adhere to!

    When I was young the average parish had two or three priests in attendance & often a chaplain to the local convent who gave a hand when necessary. There was also a sacristan who was the laity’s go-between with the clergy. Now even big parishes have only one priest & in some cases he has to provide for another smaller parish as well. Therefore the Church totally depends on the voluntary support of the Laity to undertake the day to day running of local churches in order to prevent their closure altogether. This continuing situation places a great burden on retired couples who step in to help but cannot & should not be taken for granted by Bishops whose first duty is to ensure each parish under his jurisdiction has the benefit of all the Rites of the CC.

    This is an entirely unsatisfactory arrangement thought up by evil Cardinals & Bishops in a coup d’etat against the OHC&A Church – men who were injected into the Church by Bella Dodd some three to four decades previously & had underhandedly plotted against the structure of the Church of Ages in order to destroy her. We have now an Anti-pope supposedly governing the CC with the truly elected living Pope is confined in the background. This man has abandoned seven million of Christ’s flock in China, never speaks out against the outrageous persecution of Catholics & Christians in their own countries but welcomes the Islamist terrorists who carry out orders to kill them. How in God’s name can Trad Inc. & supporters of this regime consider it valid & licit? How can they sleep well at night when they control most of the Catholic media & could effectively call out this Satanic coup d’etat yet seem content to just on the fence out & profit by doing so?

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Amen!

    When I converted I remember being relieved that there were priests who would be shepherding the flock (me), and I did not have to figure it all out for myself. There would be God-ordained men to teach, preach, and dispense the sacraments, as well as acting as spiritual fathers to us.

    Of course, I was in a Novus Ordo parish, and our RCIA staff were all laity. I only saw the priest at Mass, in fact, I can say that I only saw a priest outside of Mass a couple times (one was my first confession) before my confirmation at Easter Vigil.

    The Novus Ordo Church, the “fruit” of Vatican II, has left its flock in the hands of laity who lack the God-anointed graces to carry out what the priests were called to do.

    Liked by 3 people

  3. Well said, Brother! You are right. If you start the list down here of all the “laicists” out there who only use the clergy as a means to their ends (promoting their channels and careers as theologians, professors and canon lawyers), you’ll see what I mean:

    Background: Anglican, Evangelical, Assemblies of God, Pentecostal, First United Methodist, Presbyterian, Freemasonry, New Age looney (too many drugs in the 80’s), etc…

    Like

Leave a Comment (See About Page for comment policy)

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.