Most priests do not know that they have a canonical right to stop naming Bergoglio in the Canon of the Mass. They think wrongly that to do so would either be outside of their authority or would involve an act of schism. That it is not schism nor a sin, is proven thus:
Here is the canonical argument
First, a validly elected Pope must be named in the Canon of the Mass as a sign of communion. This is by tradition and liturgical law.
Second: Pope Benedict XVI was validly elected Roman Pontiff on April 19, 2005 A. D., just three days after his 78th birthday.
This is a dogmatic fact, which cannot be denied.
No validly elected pope’s name must be omitted from the Canon of the Mass during his lifetime, or before he validly resigns.
Third: Pope Benedict XVI did not resign on Feb. 11, 2013, he merely retired from the active ministry, as he himself said on Feb. 28, 2013 in his final Allocution (see other evidence here). For extensive canonical information about this see ppbxvi.org.
Fourth: That Pope Benedict XVI did validly resign was the falsehood which emanated from the Desk of Cardinal Sodano. (See explanation here)
Now just as Cardinal Sodano should have acted, is how all priest should act. Namely,
In accord with Canon 40, Priests who are to say mass hold a munus which is merely executory, in regard to whom to name at Mass in the Canon as Pope. This is because they do not decide on their own authority who is the pope and who is not the pope. They follow the command of a superior. That superior is above all the Pope.
If a pope therefore does not renounce his office in accord with canon 332 §2, because he renounces his ministerium instead, that renunciation has no canonical effect, because there is no canon in the Church’s laws which regard the renunciation of ministries.
Therefore, in accord with canon 40 and 41 A PRIEST IS FORBIDDEN to alter the name of the Pope in the Canon of the Mass. He cannot act on the basis of the declaration of Non Solum Propter in the same illegal manner Cardinal Sodano did. To do so would be to collaborate in his grave crime, deceive the faithful and enter into de facto schism with Pope Benedict. (see that article for a greater explanation of the crime and moral offence)
Therefore, a priest must continue to name Benedict in the Canon of the Mass.
Therefore, a priest must cease and desist naming Francis as soon as he recognizes the validity of this canonical argument.
+ + +
(This argument is not that of the Editor of FromRome.Info, who has merely expanded it for a fuller explanation — There are already a great number of priests who do not name Francis, but name Benedict instead, some openly, some secretly, some by saying for the Holy Father, without a specific name. God bless and strengthen and multiply these priests!)
_________
CREDITS: The Featured Image is a photo taken by Br. Bugnolo of the Papal Altar at the Basilica of Saint Lawrence, here at Rome.
+ + +
[simple-payment id=”5295″]
By now, any priest that names “pope francis” in the canon of the mass is doing so because of one or more of the following reasons. I will now approach them with a pen or pencil, and have them fill out their reasons below, as to why they continue to name “pope francis” in the canon of the mass:
Father, please check any of the following as to why you name the disgraced, perfidious, and repugnant name of “pope francis” in the canon of the mass:
1. I am invincibly stupid.
2. I am senile.
3. I am scared to death of either my bishop, my superior/s, my brother priests, or the laity I am friends with.
4. I am waiting for the competent authorities in the hierarchy to make a determination on this matter before I do.
5. I am deliberately in favor of the satanic plot to dethrone the True Pope Benedict XVI, so I pledge allegiance to the anti pope.
6. I am simply careless or indifferent about the matter..
7. I am obstinately opposed to naming “pope francis” without a reason.
8. I am senile.
9. Other______________________________________
Please pick and choose, Father!