by Br. Alexis Bugnolo
And no, I am not talking about the events leading up to February 11, 2013.
The Plot
I am speak about the plan moving through sections of the Roman Curia right now to “solve” the problem of a “Pope emeritus”. I have this on the word of a very highly respected member of the Roman Curia who told me of it.
The enemies of Christ realize that this title proves that the resignation was never complete and therefore that Pope Benedict never renounced the Papal Office at all, and is still the pope. That means Bergoglio’s entire reign of terror was uncanonical, a fraud, of no value, not legally binding on the Church in anything.
They cannot tolerate that. So now they feel confident in removing “the evidence of the problem”.
I wonder whether there are different points of view here. Do some want Benedict to stop calling himself “pope”, signing as the “Pastor of Pastors, Pope Benedict XVI” (Benedictus XVI P.P.)*, wearing the white cassock and skull cap? Do others go so far as to want him out of the Vatican and no longer cared for by the Head of the Pontifical Household? Do still others want a “canonical” solution which pretends or keeps up the pretense of a valid resignation?
I believe dissent on this matter is visceral, right now, in the Vatican. The Head of the Vatican Police seems to have been a partisan of the group which holds that Bergoglio has no valid claim, since, when he tendered his resignation this fall, Bergoglio demanded of him that he mention, in his letter of resignation, that he recognizes “Pope Francis as the Successor of Saint Peter”, a textual statement which has nothing to do with a letter of resignation per se, but which proves that Bergoglio is on the war path to punish anyone who thinks otherwise. (Did Sodano’s sacking have anything to do with this? — I do not know, but he certainly does know of the controversy since there is nothing going on in the Vatican that he does not know through his many clients there).
And do not doubt it. The whole Roman Curia knows that Benedict is still the pope and that in their haste they were wrong in presuming that he resigned the office of St. Peter in February 2013. I make this claim on the basis of the human reactions I get when discussing this with learned partisans of the Bergoglian regime. It’s a topic with which they are very familiar and know precisely what to say and not to say to pretend otherwise. They also employ their most forceful anger against those facts and points-of-law-in-application which directly address the problem. It’s such a hot potato, that few are even willing to speak about it. And some even run away when they see you coming, if you have requested to speak with them on this topic.
Their hope is that most of the laity are dopes and will keep eating up the propaganda that their handlers in the press and social media keep putting out: Shut up! Do not think about it! It does not matter! You are seeing things! You are a heretic and a schismatic if you say otherwise!** The Revolution, in the minds of the Bergoglian party, must go forward. They have to have approbation of all that is evil and the utter destruction of the Church which claims to be founded by the true Jewish Messiah. That is the end game.
The Battle of 2020
Pope Benedict XVI for his part has made it quite clear that his “yes” to accept the Papal Office is a “forever” yes. There is thus going to be a battle, and it will break out in 2020. Catholics who love and remain in communion with Pope Benedict need to go on the war path.
We need to identify and contact the 40 to 70 Cardinals, whom the Vaticanista, Edward Pentin, said in 2017,*** were inclined to call an imperfect council to remove Bergoglio on the grounds that his claim to the papacy is vitiated by some canonical problem, whether heresy, schism or invalidity.
We need to mobilize Catholics to financially support any effort which is necessary to defend the person of the Roman Pontiff, Pope Benedict.
We need to keep up the heat on the partisans of error: those devilishly bold individuals who lie in public and are willing to say anything to keep you from realizing
- that in Canon Law the Latin word munus HAS NEVER meant MINISTERIUM,
- that Pope Benedict NEVER SAID HE RESIGNED the petrine munus
- that Pope Benedict NEVER AFFIRMED THAT HE INTENDED to resign the petrine munus.
- that the Cardinals and journalists are not infallible, when they say the contrary of nn. 1, 2, or 3.
- that the Cardinals, journalists, and Bishops have NO AUTHORITY WHATSOEVER to interpret the act of renunciation of Feb. 11, 2013 as an act of renunciation of anything other than ministerium.
Those who are telling these lies are all getting hefty salaries from someone. Those who are calling out the liars get salaries from no one. That should tell you which side is from God and which is from Mammon. As public liars and frauds, they have no right to be seen for what they are not: honest men who are intellectually respectable or reliable. For more than 6.5 years they have marshaled no arguments against the canonical invalidity. And yet they insist that they should be listened to!
Operation Portugal
We need to organize Catholics in Portugal to prepare a place or places of refuge for the Pope, if He should chose to flee Rome, since, as Our Lady hinted in BOLD LETTERS during the apparitions there, “In Portugal the dogma of the Faith will be preserved.” And all who know their Catholic theology well, know that that implies that Portugal will at the very least remain in communion with the true Pope, if not be a place of refuge for him and His valid successors, if needed.
May the Holy Saints of the Knights Templar**** in Portugal and their devotees in our own time MOBILIZE.
May we all do our duty now in the most important battle, in the Church, to come in 2000 years.
_________
* Which clearly indicates he has in his own mind never resigned or intended to resign the Papal dignity, despite what some Cardinals are conjecturing.
** This plot to dethrone Benedict is thus evidence that their propaganda has been just that. It has served to hide the evidence from public view, it never was an honest denial.
*** See the timely report by Fred Martinez at http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2019/12/is-fear-factor-keeping-francis-in-power.html
**** I mention this Order because it took refuge from an unjust suppression in Portugal and was refounded there in the 14th century. There are thus many faithful Catholics devoted to their memory, in Portugal, and I pray they become the network for helping Pope Benedict.
Reblogged this on PASSAPAROLADESSO.
What are the 40-50 Cardinals afraid? 40-50 Cardinals resigning en mass in protest would surely cause a stir—or would it? My guess is that they believe this would cause no stir at all, no awakening, no uprising, and little support except from 2-5% of the faithful. They are right about the extent of their support. But they are wrong not to take action because upholding the faith is their sworn duty and the 2-5% of the faithful would support them in their efforts to rid the Church of anti-pope Bergoglio. As Fred Marinez says:
“Pray for the 40 to 70 Cardinals not commit the sin of omission by silence and call a imperfect council to investigate and judge Francis’s heresies, conclave and the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI.
Say a Our Father now for this intention.”
My goodness! Thank you for publishing this information. Not easy keeping tabs on the Bergoglian revolutionaries. We need to beat them to every move before they make it by making their plans and ploys public. Wouldn’t be surprised if they attempt to redefine BXVI’s canonical status, completely ignoring and burying the question about his invalid renunciation for good.
Does it not occur to anyone other than a few, that if Pope Benedict HAD properly resigned – the entire Papacy of Bergoglio would have been Canonically licit and his papacy under the control of the Holy Ghost and he would have been preserved like countless others of preaching/teaching error?
[Edit ….]
Happy new year! God Bless you!
Agnus,
I agree with your observation that the failed resignation enabled an apparent pope who has not the help of Christ’s grace. I honestly think that if Benedict resigned validly today and prior to doing so named Bergoglio as his successor, that the power of Christ’s prayer is such that Bergoglio would either stop doing evil, repent of evil and undo what he did, or drop dead within a very short time.
But as what Benedict should have done and did not do — for Ganswein has said that he acted CONTRARY to the advice of those whom he trusts most (a reference I think to Cardinal Brandmueller and Archbishop Muller) — he had some reason to do so.
From my observation of the history of the Church since Vatican II and in specific reference to the St Gallen Mafia’s coming into being and rise to power, I think it is very probable almost to the point of being certain that Benedict knew they would dominate the next conclave and that Cardinal Sodano would throw his support over to them, to keep the Lavander Mafia in control. Perhaps he thought it would tempt the Divine Providence to allow Bergoglio to assumed the Office of Saint Peter, and to prevent that Sacrilege he did the only thing he could do, resign in a faulty manner. I explain this in my article, How Benedict has defeated “Francis”, of Sept 11, 2019 at https://fromrome.wordpress.com/2019/09/11/how-benedict-has-defeated-francis/
Dear Angus,
I edited out the rest of your comment, because I recognize that it is one thing to be elected and another to accept one’s election.
I think it is morally impossible to assert that if Cardinal Siri did accept the election, that no Cardinal would have considered himself bound to say so in public. For even if after accepting his election he renounced and ordered the Cardinals to keep this secret, he would have been the pope and it would have been canonically obligatory to admit that.
The evidence pointed to regarding the elections of 1958 and 1963 are in my opinion only sufficient to show that Cardinal Siri declined to be a candidate at some point in the process of the election or that he never accepted being elected.
You really cannot surmise more than that without more evidence. The College of Cardinals in those years was composed of much more honorable men than today. That makes the assertion of the actual election of Cardinal Siri, on the basis of such flimsy evidence, all the more unlikely.
Agnus, if you want to act like a Christian, don’t insult your host. That is a rule for blog commenting as much as it is when you are visiting another’s home with his permission. And yes, I trash all comments which insult.
Remember too that in the text of the Third Secret there is the description of the cross:
there was a big Cross of rough-hewn trunks as of a cork-tree with the bark
Portugal is basically the world capital for cork trees.
Wow! Never knew that.
The fact that Cardinals have more fear of Bergoglio than of hell says a lot about the Argentinian Jesuit. But that is not a good reason to exonerate Cardinals and Bishops of complicity by omision. On the other hand is true that, according to Bergoglio’s strategy, the prelates who are becoming the most influential ones are those with no very solid formation or those with wicked interests or dirty linen.
And regarding the possible plot against Pope Benedict XVI, it would only be the second part of the plot if the imposters have realized that the first part of it wasn’t so successful and they understand that darkness won’t be total in the Vatican while The Holy Father Benedict remains P.P.. I think that he is not only much more clever and wiser than his enemies, but he has the divine inspiration, and what he did in February 2013 must be full of sense although we don’t understand it now. But we will, I’m sure.
This is the second or third time I have re-read this post and the same thought keeps coming to mind so I am offer it. I’m actually afraid that they will try to kill him or threaten him to do what he will not. He will then possibly flee Rome. They will look for him if he flees and goes into hiding (like Viganò). I wish someone would tell me that this won’t happen but I really fear it will.
Dear Remnant Child,
I its possible, because they are so evil.
Dear Remnant Child,
It’s possible, because they are so evil.
Pope Benedict may still be Pope, but he’s also a modernist who helped destroy the Catholic Church through the diffusion of error and corruption. Don’t make the mistake of thinking he’s acceptable because Bergoglio is worse.
Matthew, you are in great error, because a man is pope not because he is holy or suits our preferences or is not led into error by the errors of men about him, but because he is canonically elected and has not canonically resigned. If you honestly think Benedict who restored the Ancient Rite and publicly condemned the agenda of the St Gallen Mafia throughout his pontificate was helping to destroy the Church, I kindly suggest you calm down or seek some help.